Abstract
Using unusually rich (for transition economies) follow-up survey data and propensity score matching techniques, this paper seeks to increase our knowledge on what active labor market programs (ALMPs) work in South-East European countries by providing estimates of the effects of four ALMPs implemented in Romania in the late 1990 s. We find that three programs (training and retraining, self-employment assistance, and public employment and relocation services) had success in improving participants’ economic outcomes. In contrast, public employment was found detrimental for the employment prospects of its participants. Our sensitivity analysis also finds evidence that, in the case of training and retraining, self-employment assistance, and public employment and relocation services, operators “cream off” the most qualified candidates among the unemployed; whereas public employment seems to be used as a regional policy by “bringing work to the workers”, that is, creating jobs in high unemployment regions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abadie A, Imbens G. (2006) On the Failure of the Bootstrap for Matching Estimators. Working Paper. Harvard University, Cambridge
Bechterman G, Olivar K, Dar A (2004) Impact of Active Labor Market Programs: New Evidence from Evaluations with Particular Attention to Developing and Transition Countries. Social Protection Discussion Paper Series 0402
Bender S, Bergemann A, Fitzenberger B, Lechner M, Miquel R, Speckesser S, Wunsch C (2005) Uber dieWirksamkeit von Fortbildungs- und Umschulungsmaßnahmen. Beiträge zur Arbeitsmarkt-und Berufsforschung. IAB, Nürnberg
Bender S, Klose C (2000) Berufliche Weiterbildung für Arbeitslose – ein Weg zurück in die Beschäftigung? Analyse einer Abgängerkohorte des Jahres 1986 aus Maßnahmen der Fortbildung und Umschulung mit der ergänzten IAB–Beschäftigtenstichprobe 1975–1990. Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt– und Berufsforschung 33(3): 421–444
Benus J, Rude J, Patrabansh S (2001) Impact of the Emergency Demobilization and Reintegration Project in Bosnia & Herzegovina. Abt Associates
Boeri T, Burda M (1996) Active labor market programs, job matching, and the Czech miracle. Eur Econ Rev 40: 805–817
Burda M , Lubyova M (1995) The Impact of Active Labor Market Policies: a Closer Look at the Czech and Slovak Republics. Discussion Paper No. 1102, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London
Brown D, Earle J, Gimpelson V, Kapeliushnikov R, Lehmann H, Telegdy A, Vantu I, Visan R, Voicu A (2006) Nonstandard Forms and Measures of Employment and Unemployment in Transition: A Comparative Study of Estonia, Romania, and Russia. Budapest Working Papers on the Labour Market from Institute of Economics 602, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Dar A, Tzannatos Z (1999) Active Labor Market Programs: A Review of the Evidence from Evaluations. Social Protection Discussion Paper 9901. The World Bank, Washington, DC
Earle J, Pauna C (1996) Incidence and duration of unemployment in Romania. Eur Econ Rev 49: 829–837
Earle J, Pauna C (1998) Long-term unemployment, social assistance and labor market policies in Romania. Empir Econ 23: 203–235
Fay R (1996) Enhancing the Effectiveness of Active Labor Market Policies: Evidence from Program Evaluations in OECD countries. Labor Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers 18, Paris
Fitzenberger B, Speckesser S (2007) Employment effects of the provision of specific professional skills and techniques in Germany. Empir Econ 32: 529–573
Gill I, Dar A (1995) Cost and Effectiveness of Retraining in Hungary. Internal Discussion Paper IP-155, Europe and Central Asia Region, The World Bank
Heckman J, Ichimura H, Todd P (1997) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training program. Rev Econ Stud 64: 605–654
Heckman J, Smith J (1999) The preprogram earnings dip and the determinants of participation in a social program: implications for simple program evaluation strategies. Econ J 108: 313–348
Heckman J, Smith J (2004) The determinants of participation in a social program: evidence from a prototypical job training program. J Labor Econ 22: 243–298
Irac D, Minoiu C (2006) Risk Insurance in a Transition Economy: Evidence from Rural Romania. Department of Economics, University of Columbia
Imbens G (2004) Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: a review. Rev Econ Stat 86: 4–29
Jürges H (2005) Objects in the mirror are closer than they appear: unemployment, retrospective error, and life satisfaction. Schmollers Jahrb 125: 157–165
Katz L (1994) Active labor market policies to expand employment and opportunity. In: Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, issue January, pp 239–322
Kluve J (2006) The Effectiveness of European Active Labor Market Policy. IZA Discussion Paper 2018
Kluve J, Lehmann H, Schmidt C (1999) Active Labor market policies in Poland: human capital enhancement, stigmatization, or benefit churning? J Comp Econ 27: 61–89
Kluve J, Lehmann H, Schmidt C (2008) Disentangling treatment effects of polish active labor market policies: the role of labor force status sequences. Labour Econ 15: 1270–1295
Kupets O (2000) The impact of active labor market policies on the outflows from unemployment to regular jobs in Ukraine Thesis. Nation University. Kiev-Mohyla Academy
Lehmann H (1995) Active Labor Market Policies in the OECD and in Selected Transition Economies. Policy Research Working Paper 1502, World Bank
Lechner M, Miquel R, Wunsch C (2005a) Long-Run effects of public sector sponsored training in West Germany. IZA Discussion Paper 1443
Lechner M, Miquel R, Wunsch C (2005b) The curse and blessing of training the unemployed in a changing economy: The case of East Germany after Unification. Discussion Paper, University of St. Gallen
Leetmaa R, Võrk A (2004) Evaluation of active labour market programmes in Estonia. Mimeo
Leuven E, Sianesi B (2003) Psmatch2: Stata module to perform Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. Available at http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html
Lubyova M, van Ours JC (1999) Effects of active labor market programs on the transition rate from unemployment into regular jobs in the Slovak Republic. J Comp Econ 27: 805–837
Martin JP (1998) What Works among Active Labor Market Policies: Evidence form OECD Countries’ Experiences. Labor Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers No. 35. Paris
Martin J, Grubb D (2001) What Works and For Whom: A Review of OECD Countries’ Experiences with Active Labor Market Policies. Office of Labor Market Policy Evaluation. Working Paper 2001/14
Nesporova A (2002) Why Unemployment Remains so High in Central and Eastern Europe. International Labor Office, Employment paper 2002/43
O’Leary CJ, Kolodziejczyk P, Lazar G (1998) The net impact of active labor programs in Hungary and Poland. Int Labor Rev 137: 321–346
Oyer P (2004) Recall bias among displaced workers. Econ Lett 82: 392–397
Plesca M, Smith J (2007) Evaluating multi-treatment programs: theory and evidence from the U.S. Job training partnership act experiment. Empir Econ 32: 491–528
Puhani P (1998) Advantage through Training? A Microeconometric Evaluation of the Employment Effects of Active Labor Market Programs in Poland. ZEW Discussion Paper no. 98–25, Manheim
Romania National Institute of Statistics (2006) Quality Report on 2006 Structure of Household Labor Survey
Rosenbaum P (1995) Observational Studies. Springer Series in Statistics, New York
Rosenbaum P, Rubin D (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biom 27: 33–60
Roy A (1951) Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings. Oxf Econ Pap 3: 135–145
Rubin D (1974) Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Educ Psychol 66: 688–701
Rubin D (1977) Assignment to treatment group on the basis of a covariate. J Educ Stat 2: 1–26
Sianesi B (2004) An evaluation of the Swedish system of active labor market programs in the 1990 s. Rev Econ Stat 86: 133–155
Smith J, Todd P (2005) Does matching overcome LaLonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators? J Econom 125: 305–353
Song Y (2007) Recall bias in the displaced workers survey: are layoffs really lemons? Labour Econ 14: 335–345
Terrell K, Munich D (1995) An Overview of Labor Market Policies in the Czech Republic. Paper presented at the OECD Technical Workshop, “What can we learn from the experience of transition countries with labour market policies,” Vienna
Terrell K, Sorm V (1999) Labor market policies and unemployment in the Czech Republic. J Comp Econ 27: 33–60
Vidovic H (2004) Labour Markets and Employment Development in South East Europe in Survey of Economic and Social Challenges in South-East Europe
Vodopivec M (1999) Does the Slovenian public work program increase participants’ chances to find a job? J Comp Econ 27: 113–130
Walsh K, Kotzeva M, Dolle E, Dorenbos R (2001) Evaluation of the Net Impact of Active Labor Market Programs in Bulgaria. Ministry of Labor and Social Policy, Bulgaria
World Bank (2002) Evaluation of Active Labor Programs in Macedonia. Final Report. Social Reform and Technical Assistance Project. IDA-2722-MK
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
The Below is the Electronic Supplementary Material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rodríguez-Planas, N., Jacob, B. Evaluating active labor market programs in Romania. Empir Econ 38, 65–84 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0256-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0256-z
Keywords
- Active labor market programs
- Propensity score matching
- Transition economies
- Pre-program employment information