Abstract
A naïve Bayes classifier method for tool condition monitoring is described. End-milling tests were performed at different spindle speeds and the cutting force was measured using a table-mounted dynamometer. The effect of tool wear on force features in the time and frequency domains was evaluated and used for training the classifier. The amount of tool wear was predicted using the naïve Bayes classifier method. Two cases are presented. First, the tool wear is divided into discrete states based on the amount of flank wear and the probability of the tool wear being in any state is updated using force data. Second, a continuous case is considered and the probability density function of the tool flank wear width is updated. The results are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Konstantinos S, Athanasios K (2014) Reliability assessment of cutting tool life based on surrogate approximation methods. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71(5–8):1197–1208
Yeo S, Khoo L, Neo S (2000) Tool condition monitoring using reflectance of chip surface and neural network. J Intell Manuf 11:507–514
Kurada S, Bradley C (1997) A review of machine vision sensors for tool condition monitoring. Comp Ind 34:55–72
Rehorn AG, Jiang J, Orban PE (2005) State-of-the-art methods and results in tool condition monitoring: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26(7–8):693–710
Prickett PW, Johns C (1999) An overview of approaches to end milling tool monitoring. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 39:105–122
Dimla E Snr (2000) Sensor signals for tool-wear monitoring in metal cutting operations—a review of methods. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40:10735–11098
Burke LI, Rangwala S (1991) Tool condition monitoring in metal cutting: a neural network approach. J Intell Manuf 2(5):269–280
Sick B (2002) On-line and indirect tool wear monitoring in turning with artificial neural networks—a review of more than a decade of research. Mech Syst Signal Process 16(4):487–546
Dornfeld DA (1990) Neural network sensor fusion for tool condition monitoring. Ann CIRP 39:101–105
Ghosh N, Ravi YB, Patra A, Mukhopadhyay S, Paul S, Mohanty AR, Chattopadhyay AB (2007) Estimation of tool wear during CNC milling using neural network-based sensor fusion. Mech Syst Signal Process 21:466–479
Jemielniak K, Leszek K, Pawel W (1998) Diagnosis of tool wear based on cutting forces and acoustic emission measures as inputs to a neural network. J Intell Manuf 9(5):447–455
Aliustaoglu C, Ertunc HM, Ocak H (2009) Tool wear condition monitoring using a sensor fusion model based on fuzzy inference system. Mech Syst Signal Process 23(2):539–546
Li X, Yuan Z (1998) Tool wear monitoring with wavelet packet transform—fuzzy clustering method. Wear 219(2):145–154
Chen JC, Susanto V (2003) Fuzzy logic based in-process tool-wear monitoring system in face milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21(3):186–192
Kuo RJ, Cohen PH (1998) Intelligent tool wear estimation system through artificial neural networks and fuzzy modeling. Artif Intell Eng 12(3):229–242
Li AU, Elbestawi MA (1996) Fuzzy clustering for automated tool condition monitoring in machining. J Mech Syst Signal Proc 10(5):533–550
Li X, Yao Y, Yuan Z (1997) On-line tool condition monitoring system with wavelet fuzzy neural network. J Intell Manuf 8(4):271–276
Chen JC (1996) A fuzzy nets tool breakage detection system for end milling operations. J Adv Manuf Technol 12:153–164
Dey S, Stori JA (2005) A Bayesian network approach to root cause diagnosis of process variations. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(1):75–91
Atlas L, Ostendod M, Bernard GD (2000) Hidden Markov Models for monitoring tool wear. IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Proc 6:3887–3890
Ertunc HM, Loparo KA (2001) A decision fusion algorithm for tool wear condition monitoring in drilling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(9):1347–1362
Ertunc HM, Loparo KA, Ocak H (2001) Tool wear condition monitoring in drilling operations using hidden Markov models (HMMs). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:1363–1384
Vallejo AG, Nolazco-Flores JA, Morales-Menéndez R, Sucar LE, Rodríguez CA (2005) Tool-Wear Monitoring Based on Continuous Hidden Markov Models, Progress in Pattern recognition. Image Anal Appl Lect Comp Sci 3773:880–890
Constantinides N, Benett S (1987) An investigation of methods for on-line estimation of tool wear. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 27(2):225–237
Domingos P, Pazzani M (1997) Beyond independence: Conditions for the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier. Mach Learn 29:103–130
Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG (2012) Pattern classification. John Wiley & Sons
Zhang H (2004) The Optimality of Naive Bayes. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference. AAAI Press, Miami Beach
Geiger D, Heckerman D (1997) A characterization of the Dirichlet distribution through global and local independence. Ann Stat 25:1344–1369
Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2004) Bayesian data analysis. Chapman and Hall CRC, Boca Raton
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karandikar, J., McLeay, T., Turner, S. et al. Tool wear monitoring using naïve Bayes classifiers. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77, 1613–1626 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6560-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6560-6