Abstract
The planning and control of product development is based on the pre-estimation of product design time (PDT). In order to optimize the product development process (PDP), it is necessary for managers and designers to evaluate design time/effort at the early stage of product development. However, in systemic analytical methods for PDT this is somewhat lacking. This paper explores an intelligent method to evaluate the PDT regarding this problem. At the early development stage, designers lack sufficient product information and have difficulty in determining PDT via subjective evaluation. Thus, a fuzzy measurable house of quality (FM-HOQ) model is proposed to provide measurable engineering information. Quality function deployment (QFD) is combined with a mapping pattern of “function→principle→structure” to extract product characteristics from customer demands. Then, a fuzzy neural network (FNN) model is built to fuse data and realize the estimation of PDT, which makes use of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation to simplify structure. In a word, the whole estimation method consists of four steps: time factors identification, product characteristics extraction by QFD and function mapping pattern, FNN learning, and PDT estimation. Finally, to illustrate the procedure of the estimation method, the case of injection mold design is studied. The results of experiments show that the intelligent estimation method is feasible and effective. This paper is developed to provide designers with PDT information to help them in optimizing PDP.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
DeMarco T (1998) Controlling software projects: management, measurement, and estimation. Yourdon, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA
Bashir HA, Thomson V (2001) Models for estimating design effort and time. Des Stud 22(2):141–155
Griffin A (1997) Modeling and measuring product development cycle time across industries. J Eng Technol Manage 14(1):1–24
Griffin A (1997) The effect of project and process characteristics on product development cycle time. J Mar Res 34(1):24–35
Jacome MF, Lapinskii V (1997) NREC: risk assessment and planning for complex designs. IEEE Des Test Comput 14(1):42–49
Jahan–Shahi H, Shayan E, Masood SH (2001) Multivalued fuzzy sets in cost/time estimation of flat plate processing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17(10):751–759
Seo KK, Park JH, Jang DS, Wallace D (2002) Approximate estimation of the product life cycle cost using artificial neural networks in conceptual design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19(6):461–471
Zirger BJ, Hartley JL (1994) A conceptual model of product development cycle time. J Eng Technol Manage 11(3):229–251
Zirger BJ, Hartley JL (1996) The effect of acceleration techniques on product development time. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 43(2):143–151
Ittner CD, Larcker DF (1997) Product development cycle time and organizational performance. J Mar Res 34(1):13–23
Tatikonda MV, Rosenthal SR (2000) Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development project execution success: a deeper look at task uncertainty in product innovation. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 47(1):74–87
Ali A, Krapfel RJ, LaBahn D (1995) Product innovativeness and entry strategy: impact on cycle time and break-even time. J Prod Innovat Manage 12(1):54–69
Prasad B (1998) Review of QFD and related deployment techniques. J Manuf Syst 17(3):221–234
Chan LK, Wu ML (2002) Quality function deployment: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 143(3):463–497
Hauser JR, Clausing D (1988) The house of quality. Harvard Bus Rev 66(3):67–73
Cristiano JJ, Liker JK, White CC (2001) Key factors in the successful application of quality function deployment (QFD). IEEE Trans Eng Manage 48(1):81–95
Tsai YT, Chang YM (2004) Function-based cost estimation integrating quality function development to support system design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 23(7):514–522
Chuang PT (2001) Combining the analytic hierarchy process and quality function deployment for a location decision from a requirement perspective. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 18(11):842–849
Temponi C, Yen J, Tiao WA (1999) House of quality: a fuzzy logic-based requirements analysis. Eur J Oper Res 117(2):340–354
Kim KJ, Moskowitz H, Dhingra A, Evans G (2000) Fuzzy multicriteria models for quality function deployment. Eur J Oper Res 121(3):504–518
Zhou M (1998) Fuzzy logic and optimization models for implementing QFD. Comput Ind Eng 35(2):237–240
Vanegas LV, Labib AW (2001) A fuzzy quality function deployment (FQFD) model for deriving optimum targets. Int J Prod Res 39(1):99–120
Dubois D, Prade H (1980) Fuzzy sets and systems, theory and applications. Academic Press, New York
Huang CY (1992) Design methodology (in Chinese). China Machine Press, Beijing
Suh NP (1990) The principles of design. Oxford University Press, London
Gupta MM, Rao DH (1994) On the principles of fuzzy neural networks. Fuzzy Sets Syst 61(1):1–18
Takagi T, Sugeno M (1985) Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 15(1):116–132
Bezdek JC (1981) Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. Plenum, New York
Howon C, Jordan JB (1992) On the optimal choice of parameters in a fuzzy C-means algorithm. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, San Diego, California, March 1992, pp 349–353
Zhang LM (1993) Model and application of artificial neural network (in Chinese). Fudan University Press, Shanghai
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, D., Yan, H.S. An intelligent estimation method for product design time. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 30, 601–613 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0098-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0098-6