Abstract
This paper focuses on the estimation of three distance-related effects on outward FDI. (1) Distance harms vertical multinationals, since they engage in trade. (2) It makes non-trading multinationals better off than exporters. (3) This positive effect on horizontal FDI is expected to rise with bilateral parent and host market size. The use of panel data and related econometric methods is highly recommended to avoid parameter bias from endogenous, unobserved, time-invariant effects. A unified estimation approach to assess all three hypotheses then has to rely on instrumental variable techniques for generalized least-squares methods. In the empirical analysis of 1989-1999 bilateral US outward FDI stocks at the industry level, it is shown that testing and accounting for autocorrelation is extremely important for parameter inference. In sum, the paper lends strong support to the theory of horizontally organized multinationals as outlined in Markusen and Venables (J Int Econ 52(2):209–234).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Amemiya T (1971). The estimation of the variances in a variance-components model. Int Econ Rev 12(1): 1–13
Amemiya T and MaCurdy TE (1986). Instrumental-variable estimation of an error components model. Econometrica 54(4): 869–881
Anderson JE (1979). Theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. Am Econ Rev 69(1): 106–116
Anderson JE (2000). Why do nations trade (so little)?. Paci Econ Rev 5(2): 115–134
Anderson JE and Wincoop E (2004). Trade costs. J Econ Lit 42(3): 691–751
Baltagi BH (2001). Econometric analysis of panel data. Wiley, Chichester
Baltagi BH and Khanti-Akom S (1990). On efficient estimation with panel data: an empirical comparison of instrumental variable estimators. J Appl Econ 5(4): 401–406
Baltagi BH and Wu PX (1999). Unequally spaced panel data regressions with AR(1) disturbances. Econ Theory 15(6): 814–823
Barrios S, Görg H and Strobl E (2004). Multinational enterprises and new trade theory: evidence for the convergence hypothesis. Open Econ Rev 14(4): 397–418
Bergstrand JH (1985). The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. Rev Econ Stat 67(3): 474–481
Bergstrand JH (1989). The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition and factor proportions theory in international trade. Rev Econ Stat 71(1): 143–153
Bergstrand JH, Egger P (2007) A knowledge-and-physical-capital model of international trade, foreign direct investment, and foreign affiliate sales: developed countries. J Int Econ (forthcoming)
Blonigen BA, Davies RB and Head K (2003). Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise: Comment. Am Econ Rev 93(3): 980–994
Brainard LS (1997). An empirical assessment of the proximity-concentration trade-off between multinational sales and trade. Am Econ Rev 87(4): 520–544
Breusch TS, Mizon GE and Schmidt P (1989). Efficient estimation using panel data. Econometrica 57(3): 695–700
Carr D, Markusen JR and Maskus KE (2001). Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise. Am Econ Rev 91(3): 693–708
Cornwell C, Schmidt P and Wyhowski D (1992). Simultaneous equations and panel data. J Econ 51(1–2): 151–181
Dixit AK and Stiglitz JE (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Am Econ Rev 67(3): 297–308
Egger P and Pfaffermayr M (2004). Estimating short run and long run effects in static panel models. Econ Rev 23(3): 199–214
Egger P and Pfaffermayr M (2005). Trade, multinational sales and FDI in a three-factors model. Rev Int Econ 13(4): 659–675
Ekholm K, Forslid R and Markusen JR (2007). Export-platform foreign direct investment. J Europ Econ Assoc 5(4): 776–795
Fuller WA and Battese GE (1973). Transformations for estimation of linear models with nested error structure. J Am Stat Assoc 68(343): 626–632
Fuller WA and Battese GE (1974). Estimation of linear models with cross-error structure. J Econometrics 2(1): 67–78
Grossman GM, Helpman E and Szeidl A (2006). Optimal integration strategies for the multinational firm. J Int Econ 70(1): 216–238
Hanson GH, Mataloni R and Slaughter MJ (2002). Expansion strategies of US multinational firms. In: Rodrik, D and Collins, S (eds) Brookings trade forum 2001, pp 245–294. The Brookings Institution, Washington DC
Hausman JA and Taylor WE (1981). Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica 49(6): 1377–1398
Helpman E (1984). A simple theory of international trade with multinational corporations. J Polit Econ 92(3): 451–471
Helpman E and Krugman PR (1985). Market structure and foreign trade. MIT Press, Cambridge
Hummels D (2001) Toward a geography of trade costs, working paper. Purdue University Available at: http://www.mgmt.purdue.edu/faculty/hummelsd/research.htm
Leamer EE (1984). Sources of international comparative advantage: Theory and evidence. MIT Press, Cambridge
Limao N and Venables AJ (2001). Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs and trade. World Bank Econ Rev 15(3): 451–479
Markusen JR (2002). Multinational firms and the theory of international trade. MIT Press, Cambridge
Markusen JR and Maskus KE (2002). Discriminating among alternative theories of the multinational enterprise. Rev Int Econ 10(4): 694–707
Markusen JR and Venables JA (2000). The theory of endowment, intra-industry and multinational trade. J Int Econ 52(2): 209–234
Martín C, Velázquez F (1997) The determining factors of foreign direct investment in Spain and the rest of the OECD: lessons for CEECs. CEPR discussion papers no. 1637, CEPR, London
Metcalf GE (1996). Specification testing in panel data with instrumental variables. J Econ 71(1–2): 291–307
Shea J (1997). Instrument relevance in multivariate linear models: a simple measure. Rev Econ Stat 79(2): 348–352
Yeaple SR (2003). The complex integration strategies of multinational firms and cross-country dependencies in the structure of foreign direct investment. J Int Econ 60(2): 293–314