Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Treatment of infections among critically ill patients remains problematic, with ongoing challenges in antimicrobial dosing optimisation. Strategies, such as model-informed precision dosing (MIPD), may be effective solutions but as yet without documented clinical benefit.
In a paper published in the December issue of Intensive Care Medicine, Ewoldt and colleagues conducted the DOLPHIN trial to evaluate whether a MIPD intervention (therapeutic drug monitoring [TDM] and use of dosing software) in critically ill patients prescribed beta-lactam antimicrobials and ciprofloxacin decreased length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) when compared to standard dosing alone [1]. The investigators should be commended for the first ever multicentre trial evaluating the potential benefits of MIPD in critically ill patients. The organisational aspects of conducting a multicentre study with essentially two interventions (TDM and dosing software) are challenging.
Included in the primary analysis of the trial were 388 patients (MIPD group; n = 189, standard dosing group; n = 199). Contrary to their hypothesis, the investigators found a similar median LOS among both groups, with the MIPD group having a non-significant increase of 2 days on average compared to the standard dosing group (10 days vs 8 days, respectively). In addition, pharmacodynamic (PD) target attainment in the MIPD group remained low, ranging from 55.6 to 71.4%.
Do these recent findings mark the beginning of the end to evaluating MIPD as a clinically relevant dose optimisation strategy in critically ill patients? In our opinion, no. We believe that there were some limitations with the study which should be addressed in future studies that test the benefits associated with precision-based antimicrobial dosing.
Early application of dosing interventions
Given the mortality benefits associated with using early effective antimicrobial therapy in sepsis [2], studies should ideally research dose personalisation as part of the first dose. To allow for subsequent dosing refinement to be timely, a turn-around time for reporting TDM results should ideally be within a few hours [3].
Consenting for ‘ongoing’ patient participation [4], rather than incurring the delays associated with obtaining informed consent prior to participation, would enable testing of early dosing interventions on clinical outcomes. This is especially relevant given that antimicrobial courses can often be of short duration, as evidenced by the DOLPHIN trial (median duration of therapy: 4 days in MIPD group vs 3.5 in standard dosing group) [1]. If dosing interventions are delayed, as noted in the trial where there were delays of up to 36 h in performing the initial dose adjustment, the opportunity for these to have an effect is severely handicapped.
Inclusion of critically ill sub-groups likely to benefit from a targeted dosing approach
Certain sub-groups of critically ill patients may benefit from the use of adaptive dosing adjustments that account for the bacterial kill characteristics of the antimicrobial (i.e. a pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic [PK–PD] based approach). An example of using PK–PD principles to inform dosing is use of prolonged infusions in patients prescribed time-dependent antimicrobials, such as the beta-lactam class of antimicrobials. Sub-groups where this approach may be of benefit include those with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) [5], high severity of disease [6], and pathogens with decreased susceptibility (i.e. those with a higher minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) but still within the ranges that are responsive to the chosen antimicrobial therapy) [7, 8].
Traditional ‘restrictive dose adjustments’ (i.e. a maximal cutoff to either a dose increase or decrease in between sampling periods) together with an absolute maximum in the daily dose (e.g. a maximum cumulative dose of 16–2 g of piperacillin–tazobactam) [1] may reduce the likelihood of PD target attainment in these patient sub-groups.
Future interventional studies should endeavour to enrich for these sub-groups of patients and allow for more targeted dose optimisation approaches so that challenges associated with attaining PD targets can be overcome.
Selection of MIPD software and validation of population PK models
Choice of MIPD software is a key consideration when designing clinical trials evaluating this approach (Table 1) [9]. Importantly, software usability must also be considered to ensure appropriate use so that the likelihood of PD target attainment is maximised. Likewise, integration of clinically applicable PK models into the MIPD software that are validated in local critical care settings should occur prior to software evaluation. Choice of a PK model that is not appropriate in a population where the dosing intervention is being targeted may reduce the effectiveness of the software. For example, the use of a PK model that only uses total concentrations of a highly protein bound antimicrobial is unlikely to be accurate in estimating the unbound fraction of that antimicrobial (i.e. the fraction that is pharmacologically active) [10]. This in turn will reduce the capacity of MIPD in designing dosing regimens that can achieve PD targets.
Exclusion of resistant pathogens from final analysis
Given the often limited a priori data available when planning interventional studies, there are inherent challenges in ensuring clinical trials are adequately powered to test relevant outcomes. This is especially true for interventional studies conducted in populations where actual infections may be difficult to identify, such as those with a provisional diagnosis of sepsis. Despite these challenges, patients with infections caused by pathogens not susceptible to the study drug should be excluded from the intention-to-treat analysis.
The concept of dose optimisation strategies, such as MIPD interventions, remains of great interest, albeit currently not well supported. Recent clinical trial evidence shows no favourable impact and is hampered by low rates of PD target attainment.
Nevertheless, dose optimisation strategies such as MIPD are still likely to be important in ensuring effective antimicrobial therapy. Testing these interventions requires careful planning and should consider early application with efficient feedback mechanisms to inform dose adjustments, inclusion of sub-groups that are at high risk of therapeutic failure due to sub-optimal antimicrobial exposure and use of adaptive dosing strategies based on PK–PD principles of the chosen antimicrobial. In the case of interventions specifically using dosing software, selection of an appropriate MIPD application and integration of PK models that are validated in the targeted patient population are important to consider prior to conducting a trial that evaluates their impact on health system- and patient-centred outcomes.
Data availability
These data that support the information within this Editorial are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
Ewoldt TMJ, Abdulla A, Rietdijk WJR, Muller AE, de Winter BCM, Hunfeld NGM, Purmer IM, van Vliet P, Wils EJ, Haringman J, Draisma A, Rijpstra TA, Karakus A, Gommers D, Endeman H, Koch BCP (2022) Model-informed precision dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics and ciprofloxacin in critically ill patients: a multicentre randomised clinical trial. Intensive Care Med 48:1760–1771
Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W et al (2021) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med 47:1181–1247
Dilworth TJ, Schulz LT, Micek ST, Kollef MH, Rose WE (2022) β-Lactam therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill patients: weighing the challenges and opportunities to assess clinical value. Crit Care Explor 4:e0726
Paddock K, Woolfall K, Frith L, Watkins M, Gamble C, Welters I, Young B (2021) Strategies to enhance recruitment and consent to intensive care studies: a qualitative study with researchers and patient-public involvement contributors. BMJ Open 11:e048193
Cousson J, Floch T, Guillard T, Vernet V, Raclot P, Wolak-Thierry A, Jolly D (2015) Lung concentrations of ceftazidime administered by continuous versus intermittent infusion in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:1905–1909
Abdul-Aziz MH, Lipman J, Akova M, Bassetti M, De Waele JJ, Dimopoulos G, Dulhunty J, Kaukonen KM, Koulenti D, Martin C, Montravers P, Rello J, Rhodes A, Starr T, Wallis SC, Roberts JA (2016) Is prolonged infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem in critically ill patients associated with improved pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and patient outcomes? An observation from the defining antibiotic levels in intensive care unit patients (DALI) cohort. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:196–207
Taccone FS, Laterre PF, Dugernier T, Spapen H, Delattre I, Wittebole X, De Backer D, Layeux B, Wallemacq P, Vincent JL, Jacobs F (2010) Insufficient beta-lactam concentrations in the early phase of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care 14:R126
Taccone FS, Laupland KB, Montravers P (2016) Continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics for all critically ill patients? Intensive Care Med 42:1604–1606
Jager NGL, Chai MG, van Hest RM, Lipman J, Roberts JA, Cotta MO (2022) Precision dosing software to optimize antimicrobial dosing: a systematic search and follow-up survey of available programs. Clin Microbiol Infect 28:1211–1224
Wong G, Briscoe S, Adnan S, McWhinney B, Ungerer J, Lipman J, Roberts JA (2013) Protein binding of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients: can we successfully predict unbound concentrations? Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:6165–6170
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge Jason Roberts who initiated the idea of the Editorial, discussed concepts that were covered in the manuscript, reviewed drafts and approved the final version.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cotta, M.O., Lipman, J. & De Waele, J. Advancing precision-based antimicrobial dosing in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 49, 324–326 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06969-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06969-7