Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Dear Editor,
We agree with Robba et al. [3] who recently reviewed ONSD evaluation for non-invasive ICP estimation in the Journal that most of the clinical data collected so far have shown that ONSD monitoring is a promising but not easy-to-interpret candidate for this purpose. Of course, this and the broad attention meanwhile received in the clinical scene is good news for the method we proposed 25 years ago having performed first ICU bedside measurements in our units and ex vivo studies. However, we would like to point out some earlier reported results and methodological aspects that were not mentioned in the text.
- 1.
Close correlation (r = 0.78) between CSF pressure and ONSD had been demonstrated in vivo during in lumbar infusion tests [2]. The response varied between subjects (0.019–0.071 mm/mm Hg), likewise when measured with intracranial monitoring. In our opinion, clinical settings should perform serial ONSD measurements and always aim for a trend analysis, at least when it comes to the classical question “rising ICP?”.
- 2.
We agree, that ONSD measurements should be taken at 3 mm behind the globe. The anatomical reason is the enhanced compliance of the anterior portion of the sheath, which had been systematically studied ex vivo ([1], see Fig. 1). Measurements at the more proximal end will not pick up much response. Therefore it is recommended by most authors to average three ONSD measurements taken on each side at 3 mm to check for reproducibility.
In conclusion, we hope that ongoing improvement of ultrasound techniques will lead to more clinically useful information about pathological data and abnormality criteria. In our opinion, the compliance of all structures involved needs to be studied in more detail regarding elastic and plastic deformation to understand limitations and realistic clinical application of ONSD monitoring.
References
Hansen HC, Helmke K (1996) The subarachnoid space surrounding the optic nerves. An ultrasound study of the optic nerve sheath. Surg Radiol Anat 18(4):323–328
Hansen HC, Helmke K (1997) Validation of the optic nerve sheath response to changing cerebrospinal fluid pressure: ultrasound findings during intrathecal infusion tests. J Neurosurg 87(1):34–40
Robba C et al (2018) Optic nerve sheath diameter measured sonographically as non-invasive estimator of intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 44:1284–1294
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The author declares that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hansen, H.C., Helmke, K. Optic nerve sheath responses to pressure variations. Intensive Care Med 45, 1840–1841 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05746-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05746-3