Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Management of ARDS in patients with acute brain injury (ABI) differs in several ways from non-neurological subjects. Ventilation must be doubly protective, for the lung and the brain. Adjustment of ventilator settings is dictated by the interactions of positive-pressure ventilation with intracranial circulation, brain compliance, and cerebral autoregulatory reserve, aiming to avoid intracranial pressure (ICP) increase and inadequate cerebral blood flow (CBF). Established therapies of refractory hypoxemia such as prone positioning appear feasible but require rigorous control of ICP. Clinical data on the use of extracorporeal decarboxylation to control hypercapnia in patients with ABI and intracranial hypertension and to manage refractory hypoxemia with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remain limited. ABI-related ARDS has distinct mechanisms, determined by a cross talk between neuroinflammation, sympathetic activation, and systemic immune response, and may be exacerbated by specific neurointensive care interventions, such as CBF augmentation (Fig. 1). These differences justify a different approach to ARDS after ABI and explain why brain-injured patients are generally excluded from randomized controlled trials of ARDS.
Brain–lung interactions
Recent experimental data suggest divergent inflammatory pathways between neurogenic and non-neurogenic ARDS. In a mouse model of TBI-ARDS, activation of adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR), known to have anti-inflammatory properties in the traditional oleic acid-induced ARDS model, exerted instead a pro-inflammatory effect that aggravated lung damage [1]. Activation of the sympathetic nervous system is an important pathogenic determinant of ABI-related ARDS [2]. It induces secondary immune suppression, thereby increasing the risk of pulmonary infections. Sympathetic hyperactivity also triggers α-adrenergic discharge with subsequent hydrostatic pulmonary edema (neurogenic pulmonary edema), a distinct entity from ARDS that generally occurs earlier (within 24 h of ABI) and has been often described following high-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage. Finally, intracranial hypertension might directly increase regional, systemic, and lung inflammation and exacerbate pre-existing damage [3].
Lung–brain interactions
Ventilation: control of tidal volume, CO2, and ICP
Modest PaCO2 increases may translate into higher cerebral blood volume (CBV) and ICP, which, under conditions of poor brain compliance, may decompensate intracranial hypertension. On the basis of this strong physiologic notion, ABI patients were traditionally ventilated to maintain tight CO2 control. This notion was challenged by clinical data showing that aggressive hypocapnia (PaCO2 25–30 mmHg) may lead to secondary cerebral ischemia and that even moderate hypocapnia may be harmful in unselected ABI patients [4]. A less restrictive CO2 control seems preferable after ABI in general, aiming to keep normocapnia and to tolerate mild hypercapnia in certain conditions, such as after post-anoxic coma.
Traditional ventilation aiming for tight CO2 control also led to high tidal volumes (>9 mL/kg of predicted body weight, PBW), which were later demonstrated to exacerbate lung injury. Lung-protective ventilation with low tidal volumes (6 mL/kg of PBW) achieves greater neurophysiologic protection than high tidal volume ventilation in animal models [5, 6]. Despite lack of high-quality evidence, the actual consensus is to recommend lung protective low tidal volume ventilation (6–8 mL/kg PBW) in ABI patients for the prevention and the management of ARDS.
Oxygenation: effects of positive-pressure ventilation on cerebral circulation
PEEP may improve cerebral and systemic oxygenation, limit the utilization of high FiO2—which may in turn worsen outcome after ABI—and prevent cyclic lung recruitment/derecruitment, which can impair cerebral microcirculation [7].
Favorable effects of PEEP application must be balanced with its potential side effects on cerebral circulation. First, on the basis of the principle of the Starling resistor, increasing PEEP may impede cerebral venous outflow, thereby leading to ICP increase. In ABI patients with ARDS, however, the consequences of PEEP on ICP and brain circulation appear less relevant because of the reduced compliance of the respiratory system. Poorly compliant lung acts as an isolator: in this context, PEEP increase (up to 15 cmH2O) does not translate into clinically relevant ICP increase [6]. ICP elevations may, however, be significant if PEEP does not achieve effective alveolar recruitment but rather causes lung hyperinflation and thus impediment to cerebral venous return [8]. Second, even if ICP remains stable, PEEP may reduce systemic venous return and MAP, eventually leading to CPP decrease, mainly in patients with impaired cerebral autoregulation [9]. Maintenance of adequate volume expansion and MAP is essential to prevent cerebral hypoperfusion.
Rescue therapies
When tighter CO2 control is required to manage intracranial hypertension, pumpless extracorporeal lung assist for CO2 removal could be a safe option [10]. The use of prone positioning to manage refractory hypoxemia is feasible and efficacious to improve oxygenation providing ICP is normal. Prone positioning, however, leads to ICP elevation and CPP decrease [11]; therefore, careful ICP/CPP monitoring is mandatory.
Data on the use of venovenous ECMO for refractory hypoxemia in ABI patients remain limited to case reports [12].
External factors
The association between increased vasopressors to augment CPP and lung injury was found for epinephrine and dopamine, which were both strong independent risk factors for ARDS in TBI patients [13]. Instead of epinephrine and dopamine, norepinephrine or phenylephrine is nowadays mostly used for CBF augmentation; therefore, the putative causal role of the last agents on lung injury remains unclear. Volume resuscitation might lead to positive fluid balance which in turn aggravates ARDS.
Monitoring
Given the complex interactions of the respiratory system with brain compliance and cerebral circulation, multimodal monitoring by way of invasive ICP monitoring and, ideally, brain tissue PO2 is suggested to optimize protective ventilation in ABI patients with ARDS [14]. Careful analysis of the ICP curve and of ICP–MAP interactions helps in assessing cerebral autoregulation [15], and identifying patients in whom side effects of PEEP and recruitment maneuvers on CPP may be more relevant.
Monitoring of preload and cardiac output (echocardiography, transpulmonary thermodilution) also allows titration of fluid resuscitation and vasopressors, thereby preventing low CBF and secondary exacerbation of lung damage (e.g., by excessive fluid overload) [14].
Summary
ARDS after ABI has different mechanisms and requires a different management approach, aiming to achieve dual lung and brain protection. Standard protective ventilation strategies include:
-
“Controlled” oxygenation (aiming to avoid both hypoxia and hyperoxia)
-
Low tidal volumes
-
Tolerance of higher PaCO2 than has been traditionally accepted
-
Moderate PEEP
Brain multimodal and hemodynamic monitoring allows optimization of care guided to patient-specific intracerebral physiology. Choice of rescue therapies (prone positioning, extracorporeal CO2 removal, ECMO) may be decided on a case-by-case basis and according to local expertise.
References
Dai SS, Wang H, Yang N, An JH, Li W, Ning YL, Zhu PF, Chen JF, Zhou YG (2013) Plasma glutamate-modulated interaction of A2AR and mGluR5 on BMDCs aggravates traumatic brain injury-induced acute lung injury. J Exp Med 210(4):839–851
Winklewski PJ, Radkowski M, Demkow U (2014) Cross-talk between the inflammatory response, sympathetic activation and pulmonary infection in the ischemic stroke. J Neuroinflammation 11:213
Heuer JF, Pelosi P, Hermann P, Perske C, Crozier TA, Bruck W, Quintel M (2011) Acute effects of intracranial hypertension and ARDS on pulmonary and neuronal damage: a randomized experimental study in pigs. Intensive Care Med 37(7):1182–1191
Roberts BW, Karagiannis P, Coletta M, Kilgannon JH, Chansky ME, Trzeciak S (2015) Effects of PaCO2 derangements on clinical outcomes after cerebral injury: a systematic review. Resuscitation 91:32–41
Bickenbach J, Zoremba N, Fries M, Dembinski R, Doering R, Ogawa E, Rossaint R, Kuhlen R (2009) Low tidal volume ventilation in a porcine model of acute lung injury improves cerebral tissue oxygenation. Anesth Analg 109(3):847–855
Caricato A, Conti G, Della Corte F, Mancino A, Santilli F, Sandroni C, Proietti R, Antonelli M (2005) Effects of PEEP on the intracranial system of patients with head injury and subarachnoid hemorrhage: the role of respiratory system compliance. J Trauma 58(3):571–576
Klein KU, Boehme S, Hartmann EK, Szczyrba M, Heylen L, Liu T, David M, Werner C, Markstaller K, Engelhard K (2013) Transmission of arterial oxygen partial pressure oscillations to the cerebral microcirculation in a porcine model of acute lung injury caused by cyclic recruitment and derecruitment. Br J Anaesth 110(2):266–273
Mascia L, Grasso S, Fiore T, Bruno F, Berardino M, Ducati A (2005) Cerebro-pulmonary interactions during the application of low levels of positive end-expiratory pressure. Intensive Care Med 31(3):373–379
Muench E, Bauhuf C, Roth H, Horn P, Phillips M, Marquetant N, Quintel M, Vajkoczy P (2005) Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on regional cerebral blood flow, intracranial pressure, and brain tissue oxygenation. Crit Care Med 33(10):2367–2372
Munoz-Bendix C, Beseoglu K, Kram R (2015) Extracorporeal decarboxylation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury and ARDS enables effective control of intracranial pressure. Crit Care 19:381
Roth C, Ferbert A, Deinsberger W, Kleffmann J, Kastner S, Godau J, Schuler M, Tryba M, Gehling M (2014) Does prone positioning increase intracranial pressure? A retrospective analysis of patients with acute brain injury and acute respiratory failure. Neurocrit Care 21(2):186–191
Biscotti M, Gannon WD, Abrams D, Agerstrand C, Claassen J, Brodie D, Bacchetta M (2015) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in patients with traumatic brain injury. Perfusion 30(5):407–409
Contant CF, Valadka AB, Gopinath SP, Hannay HJ, Robertson CS (2001) Adult respiratory distress syndrome: a complication of induced hypertension after severe head injury. J Neurosurg 95(4):560–568
Le Roux P, Menon DK, Citerio G, Vespa P, Bader MK, Brophy GM, Diringer MN, Stocchetti N, Videtta W, Armonda R et al (2014) Consensus summary statement of the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 40(9):1189–1209
Aries MJ, Czosnyka M, Budohoski KP, Kolias AG, Radolovich DK, Lavinio A, Pickard JD, Smielewski P (2012) Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular reactivity using pulse waveform of intracranial pressure. Neurocrit Care 17(1):67–76
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oddo, M., Citerio, G. ARDS in the brain-injured patient: what’s different?. Intensive Care Med 42, 790–793 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4298-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4298-3