Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Dear Editor,
We would like to thank Dr. Akca for his comments on our article related to understanding the potential benefits and harms associated with oxygen therapy [1, 2]. We fully agree that the available data are not yet strong enough to make definitive conclusions regarding the toxicity of hyperoxia and its relationship (direct or not) to mortality. Indeed, the available meta-analyses suffer from considerable heterogeneity, as reported by the authors themselves. In addition, meta-analytic approaches cannot help to identify the best oxygen window opportunity for any given patient subset.
Hyperoxia may result from application of high FiO2 and/or a decrease in oxygen utilization; however, it becomes ever more difficult to refute the statistical association between hyperoxia (high PaO2) and mortality, despite its theoretical potential benefits. The prospective AVOID trial that pragmatically assessed high versus low inspired oxygen fractions in non-hypoxaemic patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction reported harmful effects in patients treated with a high FiO2. We mentioned a number of ongoing trials assessing the effects of high FiO2 in various critical illness settings. These will undoubtedly inform us how to better use oxygen, a drug that requires clear rules on timing and dosage.
References
Asfar P, Singer M, Radermacher P (2015) Understanding the benefits and harms of oxygen therapy. Intensive Care Med 41:1118–1121. doi:10.1007/s00134-015-3670-z
Akca O (2015) Hyperoxia: is it a biomarker for mortality? Intensive Care Med. doi:10.1007/s00134-015-3975-y
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Asfar, P., Singer, M. & Radermacher, P. Understanding the benefits and harms of oxygen therapy: response to comments by Akca. Intensive Care Med 41, 1875 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-3995-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-3995-7