Abstract
Objective
Positive pressure ventilation can affect systemic haemodynamics and regional blood flow distribution with negative effects on hepatic blood flow. We hypothesized that spontaneous breathing (SB) with airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) provides better systemic and hepatic blood flow than APRV without SB.
Design
Animal study with a randomized cross-over design.
Setting
Animal laboratory of Bonn University Hospital.
Subjects
Twelve pigs with oleic-acid-induced lung injury.
Interventions
APRV with or without SB in random order. Without SB, either the upper airway pressure limit or the ventilator rate was increased to maintain constant pH and PaCO2.
Measurements and results
Systemic haemodynamics were determined by double-indicator dilution, organ blood flow by coloured microspheres. Systemic blood flow was best during APRV with SB. During APRV with SB blood flow (ml g−1 min−1) was 0.91 ± 0.26 (hepatic arterial), 0.29 ± 0.05 (stomach), 0.64 ± 0.08 (duodenum), 0.62 ± 0.10 (jejunum), 0.53 ± 0.07 (ileum), 0.53 ± 0.07 (colon), 0.46 ± 0.09 (pancreas) and 3.59 ± 0.55 (spleen). During APRV without SB applying high Paw it decreased to 0.13 ± 0.01 (stomach), 0.37 ± 0.03 (duodenum), 0.29 ± 0.03 (jejunum), 0.31 ± 0.05 (ileum), 0.32 ± 0.03 (colon) and 0.23 ± 0.04 (pancreas) p < 0.01, respectively. During APRV without SB applying same Paw limits it decreased to 0.18 ± 0.03 (stomach, p < 0.01), 0.47 ± 0.06 (duodenum, p < 0.05), 0.38 ± 0.05 (jejunum, p < 0.01), 0.36 ± 0.03 (ileum, p < 0.05), 0.39 ± 0.05 (colon, p < 0.05), and 0.27 ± 0.04 (pancreas, p < 0.01). Arterial liver blood flow did not change significantly when SB was abolished (0.55 ± 0.11 and 0.63 ± 0.11, respectively).
Conclusions
Maintaining SB during APRV was associated with better systemic and pre-portal organ blood flow. Improvement in hepatic arterial blood flow was not significant.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Hepato-splanchnic hypoperfusion and dysfunction have been demonstrated to contribute substantially to increased mortality of critically ill patients [1]. Positive-pressure ventilation has been shown to decrease systemic [2] and hepato-splanchnic blood flow and performance [3, 4]; therefore, ventilatory strategies should be applied that improve gas exchange and minimally affect hepatic blood flow.
Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) provides mechanical assistance by time-cycled switching between two levels of continuous positive airway pressure while allowing spontaneous breathing throughout the ventilatory cycle [5]. In critically ill patients spontaneous breathing during APRV has been shown to improve systemic blood flow and regional perfusion to kidneys [6]. In an animal model with oleic-acid-induced lung injury we demonstrated that spontaneous breathing during APRV also provides better intestinal blood flow as determined by the coloured microspheres technique [7]. In this paper we present data derived from these experiments demonstrating the effects of APRV with and without spontaneous breathing on hepatic blood flow.
Materials and methods
The study was conducted in accordance with the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care [8] and approved by the Laboratory Animal Care and Use Committee of the District of Cologne, Germany. We used 12 pigs with oleic-acid-induced acute lung injury being tracheotomized and ventilated using the APRV mode of a standard ventilator (EVITA, Dräger, Lübeck, Germany). APRV with spontaneous breathing, and two periods of APRV without spontaneous breathing, were applied in random order. During absence of spontaneous breathing the same paCO2 and pH levels were maintained either by increasing the upper airway pressure level or the respiratory rate. While analgosedation (sodium pentobarbital 2 mg/kg h−1 and ketamine 2 mg/kg h−1) was kept constant throughout the study, neuromuscular blockade was induced with boli of 0.05 mg/kg intravenous cis-atracurium (Nimbex, GlaxoSmithKline, Munich, Germany) during the periods without spontaneous breathing. Absence of spontaneous breathing was monitored by online registration of oesophageal pressure [7]. The amount of spontaneous breathing during APRV was quantified by measuring minute volumes before and after neuromuscular blockade. After the ventilatory modality was changed, 30 min of equilibration were allowed before measurements.
Measurements included the transpulmonary double-indicator dilution technique (COLD-Z-021, Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany) to determine systemic haemodynamics and the coloured microspheres technique to measure hepatic arterial, and preportal (intestinal, pancreatic, splenic) tissue blood flow [9]. A comprehensive description of the instrumentation of the animals and measurements is provided in our previous paper [7]. In brief, after killing the animals at the end of the experiments, small pieces of the respective tissues were removed and the numbers of captured microspheres determined by spectrophotometric analysis. Tissue blood flow could be derived by relating the amount of microspheres harvested from the tissue samples to the number of microspheres harvested from an adequate aortic blood flow reference.
Statistical analysis
Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. Data were evaluated for normal distribution with the Shapiro–Wilks W-test. Data obtained during the different ventilatory modes were compared using one-way analysis of variance. When a significant F ratio was obtained, differences between the means were examined with the Newman–Keuls test. Differences were considered to be statistically significant if p was less than 0.05.
Results
Spontaneous breathing accounted for 54 ± 3% of the total minute volume and improved arterial oxygenation as compared with full ventilatory support (p < 0.05; Table 1). To keep PaCO2 and arterial pH constant during neuromuscular blockade, either the upper airway pressure limit had to be increased resulting in a higher VT and mean Paw (p < 0.001) or, at an unchanged mean Paw, the ventilator rate had to be increased (p < 0.01). Spontaneous breathing resulted in the lowest mean oesophageal pressure (p < 0.05, Table 1).
Cardiac output (141 ± 8 ml kg−1 min−1 APRV+SB, 110 ± 3 APRV-SB, high Paw, 127 ± 5 ml kg−1 min−1 APRV-SB, low Paw), intrathoracic blood volume (23 ± 1 ml kg−1 APRV+SB, 19 ± 1 ml kg−1 APRV-SB, high Paw, 21 ± 1 ml kg−1 APRV-SB, low Paw), stroke volume (1.1 ± 0.08 ml kg−1 beat−1 APRV+SB, 0.8 ± 0.03 ml kg−1 beat−1 APRV-SB, high Paw, 0.9 ± 0.08 ml kg−1 beat−1 APRV-SB, low Paw) and oxygen delivery (18.5 ± 1.3 ml kg−1 min−1 APRV+SB, 14.1 ± 0.5 APRV-SB, high Paw, 15.6 ± 0.4 ml kg−1 min−1 APRV-SB, low Paw) increased with spontaneous breathing and were lowest during full ventilatory support at increased upper Paw (p < 0.01). In parallel with systemic blood flow, gastric (p < 0.01), intestinal (p < 0.05) and pancreatic perfusion (p < 0.01) increased during APRV with spontaneous breathing (Fig. 1). Hepatic arterial and splenic blood flow were not significantly altered but also tended to improve when spontaneous breathing was maintained.
Discussion
The intention of this brief report is to demonstrate the effects of spontaneous breathing during APRV on the dual circulation of the liver in experimental acute lung injury. Blood flow to most of the preportal organs draining blood into the portal circulation improved with spontaneous breathing, whereas the effects of the ventilatory modality on the hepatic arterial circulation were less prominent.
We used APRV that provides a constant degree of ventilatory support by time-cycled switching between two CPAP levels, allowing spontaneous breathing in any phase of the ventilator cycle [5]. If spontaneous breathing is abolished, APRV is not different from pressure-controlled ventilation. The results of the present study should essentially reflect the effect of spontaneous breathing during APRV on hepatic blood flow, because in the absence of spontaneous breathing, either the ventilator rate or the upper Paw limits were increased to compensate for the decrease in alveolar ventilation and to maintain constant PaCO2 and pH. In addition, the level of analgosedation was maintained constant at the different steps of the protocol.
The liver receives approximately 25–30% of systemic blood flow [10]. One-third of total liver blood flow originates from the systemic circulation via the hepatic artery and two-thirds from the portal circulation. We used the microspheres technique because it lacks the need for any surgical manipulation, such as laparotomy, that per se may have impact on tissue perfusion [11]. The 15-μm diameter microspheres that we used show negligible shunting from arterial to portal venous circulation [12]. By this technique, it was possible to distinguish between arterial and portal perfusion. Microspheres harvested from the liver tissue originated solely from the hepatic arterial blood flow, while portal blood flow could be derived indirectly from perfusion measurements of multiple tissue samples of the stomach, intestines, pancreas and spleen.
Hepato-splanchnic perfusion has been shown to deteriorate with an increase in ventilatory support [3, 4, 13]. In these studies, the impairment of hepato-splanchnic perfusion paralleled the decrease in cardiac output. We found that APRV with spontaneous breathing increased pre-portal blood flows in excess of systemic blood flow and intrathoracic blood volume as compared with full ventilatory support. This is of additional interest, because even after restoration of adequate systemic haemodynamics, intestinal perfusion may be insufficient during mechanical ventilation [14].
Changes in hepatic arterial and splenic blood flow showed similar patterns but were not statistically significant, which may be attributed to a larger dispersion of the data. In addition, hepatic arterial blood flow may have been, in part, counter-regulated by an intrinsic hepatic mechanism: the hepatic arterial buffer response (HABR) [15]. A decrease in portal blood flow triggers an increase in hepatic arterial perfusion to maintain overall liver perfusion, and vice versa. This mechanism may be regulated by intrahepatic adenosine production and may be mediated by opening of intrahepatic arterio-venous shunts [16]. The HABR can compensate for reductions of portal blood flow up to 20–30% [15, 17, 18]; however, in our experiments, we did not find any increase in hepatic arterial blood flow. This may be explained by an exhausted HABR, since previous studies showed that the compensatory capacity of the HABR can be weakened during positive pressure ventilation in the presence of impaired systemic blood flow, hypoxaemia or endotoxaemia [13, 19].
Conclusion
Our results add further information to previous findings that spontaneous breathing during APRV improves blood flow to splanchnic organs, such as intestines and pancreas. Changes in hepatic arterial blood flow showed similar patterns but were not as prominent as those of pre-portal blood flow. Because the liver plays a key role in the pathogenesis of multiple organ failure, further studies are needed to evaluate the effects of spontaneous breathing using APRV and other modalities of partial ventilatory support on the hepatic circulation in critically ill patients.
References
Maynard ND, Bihari DJ, Dalton RN, Beale R, Smithies MN, Mason RC (1997) Liver function and splanchnic ischemia in critically ill patients. Chest 111:180–187
Pinsky MR (1997) The hemodynamic consequences of mechanical ventilation: an evolving story. Intensive Care Med 23:493–503
Matuschak GM, Pinsky MR, Rogers RM (1987) Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on hepatic blood flow and performance. J Appl Physiol 62:1377–1383
Dorinsky PM, Hamlin RL, Gadek JE (1987) Alterations in regional blood flow during positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation. Crit Care Med 15:106–113
Stock MC, Downs JB, Frolicher DA (1987) Airway pressure release ventilation. Crit Care Med 15:462–466
Hering R, Peters D, Zinserling J, Wrigge H, von Spiegel T, Putensen C (2002) Effects of spontaneous breathing during airway pressure release ventilation on renal perfusion and function in patients with acute lung injury. Intensive Care Med 28:1426–1433
Hering R, Viehofer A, Zinserling J, Wrigge H, Kreyer S, Berg A, Minor T, Putensen C (2003) Effects of spontaneous breathing during airway pressure release ventilation on intestinal blood flow in experimental lung injury. Anesthesiology 99:1137–1144
National Institutes of Health (1985) Principles of laboratory animal care. National Institutes of Health, publication no. 86–23 1985. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
Kowallik P, Schulz R, Guth BD, Schade A, Paffhausen W, Gross R, Heusch G (1991) Measurement of regional myocardial blood flow with multiple colored microspheres. Circulation 83:974–982
Bruns FJ, Fraley DS, Haigh J (1987) Control of organ blood flow. In: Snyder JV, Pinsky MR (eds) Oxygen transport in the critically ill. Year-book Medical Publishers, Chicago, pp 87–124
Gelman SI (1976) Disturbances in hepatic blood flow during anesthesia and surgery. Arch Surg 111:881–883
Fan FC, Schuessler GB, Chen RY, Chien S (1979) Determinations of blood flow and shunting of 9- and 15-micrometer spheres in regional beds. Am J Physiol 237:H25–H33
Brienza N, Revelly JP, Ayuse T, Robotham JL (1995) Effects of PEEP on liver arterial and venous blood flows. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 152:504–510
Fournell A, Scheeren TW, Schwarte LA (1998) PEEP decreases oxygenation of the intestinal mucosa despite normalization of cardiac output. Adv Exp Med Biol 454:435–440
Lautt WW (1985) Mechanism and role of intrinsic regulation of hepatic arterial blood flow: hepatic arterial buffer response. Am J Physiol 249(5 Pt 1):G549–G556
Richter S, Vollmar B, Mucke I, Post S, Menger MD (2001) Hepatic arteriolo-portal venular shunting guarantees maintenance of nutritional microvascular supply in hepatic arterial buffer response of rat livers. J Physiol 531(Pt 1):193–201
Mathie RT, Blumgart LH (1983) The hepatic haemodynamic response to acute portal venous blood flow reductions in the dog. Pflugers Arch 399:223–227
Ayuse T, Brienza N, O'Donnell CP, Robotham JL (1994) Pressure-flow analysis of portal vein and hepatic artery interactions in porcine liver. Am J Physiol 267(4 Pt 2):H1233–H1242
Ayuse T, Brienza N, Revelly JP, Boitnott JK, Robotham JL (1995) Role of nitric oxide in porcine liver circulation under normal and endotoxemic conditions. J Appl Physiol 78:1319–1329
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Bonn University Hospital, Germany.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is discussed in the editorial available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0958-7.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hering, R., Bolten, J.C., Kreyer, S. et al. Spontaneous breathing during airway pressure release ventilation in experimental lung injury: effects on hepatic blood flow. Intensive Care Med 34, 523–527 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0957-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0957-8