Abstract
Diurnal samples of PM1 (submicrometer particles, having aerodynamic diameters not greater than 1 μm) were collected at an urban background site in Zabrze (from 01.08. to 31.12.2009) and a rural background site in Racibórz (from 01.08. to 31.12.2010). The samples were analyzed for carbon (organic and elemental), water soluble ions (Na+, NH4 +, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cl−, NO3 −, SO4 2−) and concentrations of 21 elements by using, respectively, a Sunset Laboratory carbon analyzer, a Herisau Metrohm AG ion chromatograph, a PANalitycal Epsilon 5 spectrometer. To perform the monthly mass closure calculations for PM1, the chemical components were categorized into organic matter (OM), elemental carbon (EC), secondary inorganic aerosol (SIA), crustal matter (CM), marine components (MC), other elements (OE) and unidentified matter (UM). The mass contributions of secondary (SOM) and primary (POM) organic matter to PM1 were also estimated. In average, 50 % of PM1 in Zabrze and 40 % in Racibórz were secondary aerosol coming from the transformations of its gaseous precursors. High concentrations and mass contributions of EC and OM to PM, and probable PM acidic nature in Zabrze, indicate particularly high hazard from the ambient submicrometer particles to the inhabitants of southern Poland.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
The size, usually in terms of equivalent (most often aerodynamic) diameter, is a key characteristic of an atmospheric aerosol particle (Hinds 1998). All the particle properties, also these deciding the particle-human body interactions, depend on its size (López-Villarrubia et al. 2012). The strong epidemiological evidence suggests growth of the health hazard from ambient particles with the particle decreasing aerodynamic diameter—the finest particles are most harmful (Oberdörster et al. 1995; Pope and Dockery 2006; Dockery and Stone 2007; Kappos 2011). Usually, there are considerable amounts of submicrometer particles in the air (Makkonen et al. 2010; Kumar et al. 2010; Ham and Kleeman 2011; Massey et al. 2012; Aas et al. 2012). Examinations of the air quality in such cities as Wroclaw and Zabrze confirm predominance of PM1 in the urbanized areas of southern Poland (Zwoździak et al. 2011; Klejnowski et al. 2012).
The second important characteristic of atmospheric aerosol, the chemical composition of its particles, depends on the particle size, defines the volatility, density, reactivity and toxicity of the dust and affects the human health as well (Englert 2004). In Southern Poland, the airborne hazardous compounds accumulate mainly in the finest particles (Zwoździak et al. 2011; Rogula-Kozłowska et al. 2012). However, analyzing the data concerning the physical and chemical properties of atmospheric aerosol from over whole Europe (e.g. Putaud et al. 2010; EMEP 2011) one can notice evident lack of chemical characteristics of the fine dust fractions, including PM1.
The goal of the presented work was to measure concentrations, determine chemical composition and primary and secondary pollutant shares in PM1 at two sites in southern Poland: urban Zabrze and rural Racibórz.
Materials and Methods
Diurnal samples of PM1 were taken in Zabrze (01.08–31.12.2009) and in Racibórz (01.08–31.12.2010), southern Poland (Fig. 1), with the use of a Ruprecht&Patashnik Partisol 2020. They were collected on quartz and Teflon filters, the same kind every other day. Before and after exposing, the filters were conditioned in a weighing room (48 h, relative air humidity 45 % ± 5 %, air temperature 20 ± 2°C) and weighed twice, with 24 h period between, on a Mettler Toledo microbalance (resolution 2 μg).
The dust on the Teflon filters was analyzed for elemental composition (Al, Si, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Rb, Sr, Mo, Cd, Sb, Te, Ba, Pb). From each exposed quartz filter two equal segments (1.5 cm2 each) were cut, one was analyzed for OC and elemental carbon (EC), the second one entered a combined monthly sample for the month the filter came from. The monthly samples were analyzed for water soluble ions (Cl−, NO3 −, SO4 2−, Na+, NH4 +, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+).
The OC and EC contents of dust were determined with the use of a Sunset Laboratories Inc. thermal–optical instrument (NIOSH-like protocol, quartz). The instrument corrects the measurements of the products of pyrolysis of carbon compounds by measuring light absorbance of EC (CEN/TR 16243:2011). The detection limit (for TC = OC + EC), equal to 0.52 μg/m2, was determined by analyzing blank samples (clean filters, CEN/TR 16243:2011). To control its performance, the apparatus was systematically calibrated within the range of measured concentrations, blanks (several clean filters from each lot) were analyzed on a regular basis, the NIST standards (RM 8785 NIST and RM 8786 NIST, certified carbon content) were analyzed. The recovery of OC was 98 %–132 %, of EC 95 %–116 %.
The applications of a Herisau Metrohm AG ion chromatograph to examine water extracts of dust for ions and of a PANalytical Epsilon 5 EDXRF spectrometer to determine elemental composition of dust on Teflon filters are described in (Rogula-Kozłowska et al. 2012).
The mass closure computations were done for each month and site separately. The concentrations of the categories were computed from the concentrations of the dust components (Table 1). The concentration of the secondary inorganic aerosol (SIA) was the sum of the concentrations of PM1-related SO4 2−, NO3 − and NH4 +. The concentration of the marine components (MC) was the sum of PM1-related Na+ and Cl−. The concentration of organic matter (OM) was 1.4 times the concentration of PM1-related organic carbon (OC) (Turpin and Lim 2001). The concentration of crustal matter (CM) was the sum of the stoichiometrically computed concentrations of oxides of Mg2+, Fe (except for August and September in Zabrze and November and December in Racibórz), Al, Si and Ti (Querol et al. 2001; Rogula-Kozłowska et al. 2012). The concentration of the other elements (OE) is the sum of the concentrations of PM1-related K+, Ca2+, V, Cr, Mn, Fe (only for August and September in Zabrze and November and December in Racibórz), Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Rb, Sr, Mo, Cd, Sb, Ba, Pb. The PM1-related elements were included into CM and OE by analyzing their enrichment coefficients (EF, Table 2). The elements with EF greater than 5 (Table 2, bolded) were in OE, the rest was in CM. The concentration of the unidentified matter (UM) was received by subtracting the sum of the SIA, MC, OM, EC, CM, OE concentrations from the PM1 concentration.
The monthly PM1 concentrations were computed by dividing the mass of the dust collected during the month by the volume of the air the dust was taken from. The monthly mass shares (percentages) of PM1 components were computed by dividing the mass of the component collected during the month by the mass of PM1 from this month. The average monthly concentration of a component is its percentage in PM1 multiplied by the monthly PM1 concentration. The average seasonal (summer: August, September; winter: October–December) PM1 concentrations and the percentages of the component categories in the PM1 mass were computed as arithmetical means of the respective monthly concentrations and percentages (Table 3).
Results and Discussion
The PM1 concentrations were high, especially in winter, at both the rural background station in Racibórz and the urban background station in Zabrze. In winter, the concentration were higher than elsewhere in Europe during several recent years (Table 3).
The chemical compositions of PM1 in Zabrze and Racibórz were similar (Table 1). At both sites, PM1 was mainly composed of carbon, sodium, calcium and potassium, as well as sulfates, nitrates, and chlorides. The concentrations of PM1, PM1-related carbon compounds and the components of SIA were higher in winter, in November and December especially high, and much higher in Zabrze than in Racibórz. They were higher in winter because the emission of dust and its precursors grows in a heating season over whole Poland (characteristic elevated EC and SIA concentrations at both sites in December), their higher values in Zabrze were due to the character and location of the station. In Zabrze, in densely built-up and populated Silesian Agglomeration with well developed transport network, the fine dust sources are numerous and concentrated. The station in Racibórz is located in clean, typical rural area, where the emission of fine dust from traffic-related and industrial sources is low and the main fine dust sources are domestic stoves, heating boilers and, brought by south-western winds, air pollutants from Ostrava and farther regions of the Czech Republic and central Germany.
At both sites, MC (chlorides and sodium) had high, higher than in other regions of Europe, mass contributions to PM1 (Tables 1, 3). In summer, the ambient MC concentrations and MC mass contributions to PM1 were higher in Racibórz than in Zabrze—it may be a result of the combustion of biomass (leaves, grass, wood in domestic stoves) more common in neighborhood of the station in Racibórz than in Zabrze. In winter, at both sites, ambient chlorides and sodium may come from domestic boilers (combustion of low quality coal and domestic waste)—the distance to the nearest see (Baltic sea) and the size of the PM1 particles preclude any marine effects on PM1-related MC concentrations.
At both sites, like elsewhere in Europe (Tables 1, 3; Fig. 1), the concentrations of CM (oxides of Al, Si, Mg, Fe, Ti) were slightly higher in winter than in summer; the CM contributions—in summer than in winter. In summer, the average contribution of CM to PM1 was slightly greater in Zabrze than in Racibórz and it may be related with density of traffic.
Trace elements (OE) had relatively high, higher in summer than in winter, mass contributions to PM1 at both sites (Fig. 1, from 1.7 % in Racibórz, December, to 7.9 % in Zabrze, August). The ambient OE concentrations were similar at both sites in winter, in Zabrze they were higher in summer.
As, Cd, Co, Cr, Mn, Ni and Pb present in suspended dust (especially respirable) should be considered a direct threat to human health. The concentrations Ni, As and Pb were high at both sites. Similar or higher ambient concentrations of these elements, but in PM2.5, occur in other cities of southern Poland (Rogula-Kozłowska et al., in press), nevertheless the concentrations in Zabrze and Racibórz were sometimes more than ten times the concentrations in other urban regions in Europe (e.g. Vasilakos et al. 2007; Pérez et al. 2008; Vecchi et al. 2004). Pb and other metals are present in hard and brown coal, the principal sources of energy in Poland. In Zabrze, road traffic (admixtures in gasoline, oils, lubricants), industry—lead refinery, aluminum and iron foundries, galvanizing plants, cokery plants, tile factory, bituminous mass factory, and other located in Zabrze or in the neighbor cities, are additional sources of these elements.
At both sites and seasons, the main components of dust, OM and SIA, were related with fuel combustion in car engines, industrial energy production, and domestic stoves.
The SIA mass contributions to PM1 at the two sites were similar in seasons, the OM contributions too. The SIA contributions to PM1 at other European sites are rather higher, the OM contributions—lower (Table 3). In both Zabrze and Racibórz, the SIA contributions to PM1 in winter were lower than in summer—quite uncommon in Europe.
SIA arises from transformations of gaseous precursors, such as SO2 and NOx. In the air, SO2 oxidizes to gaseous SO3 or liquid H2SO4, then is neutralized to ammonium sulfate [(NH4)2SO4] or ammonium bisulfate (NH4HSO4). NOx photochemically oxidises to HNO3, then is neutralized to ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3). In Racibórz, the monthly concentrations of SO2 and SO4 2− were highly linearly correlated, so were the NOx and NO3 − concentrations—both R2 are equal to 0.92. The correlation coefficients for the SO2 and SO4 2− concentrations and the NOx and NO3 − concentrations in Zabrze are 0.66 and 0.36, respectively. The correlation coefficients for the SO2 and SIA concentrations and the NOx and SIA concentrations are 0.77 and 0.12 in Zabrze and 0.97 and 0.88 in Racibórz, respectively.
In Racibórz, the neutralization ratio NR (normal equivalent, ratio of NH4 + and SO4 2− + NO3 − concentrations) was from 0.46 (September) to 1.1 (December), the five-month average is 0.73. Hence, in September (also in August and October) the amount of ambient NH4 + was not sufficient to fully neutralize ambient H2SO4 and HNO3. NR close to 1 occurred in Racibórz in November and December suggesting alkaline character of PM1. In Racibórz, the ratio NH4 +/SO4 2− (0.37 for (NH4)2SO4) was between 0.6 and 1.5 from June to December. So, in Racibórz, ambient NH4 + could neutralize whole ambient SO4 2−; in some periods (especially in hot ones) it might not be able to neutralize total ambient HNO3. This and better correlation of SO2 with SIA than NOx with SIA mean that SIA in Racibórz mainly consisted of ammonium sulfate and ammonium bisulfate. Ammonium nitrate contributed to SIA less in August-October than in winter.
In Zabrze NR was very low: from 0.12 in October to 0.21 in August, its five-month average is 0.17. The proportion NH4 +/SO4 2− was from 0.17 in October to 0.28 in August. So, there was not enough ambient NH4 + to neutralize ambient H2SO4 in Zabrze, the atmospheric aerosol might have acidic reaction—it may be confirmed by acidity of precipitations in Silesia (Hławiczka et al. 2003). In summer, the weather conditions are not favorable for the formation of NH4NO3 in the air. At first, NH4 + neutralizes sulfates (confirmed by higher proportion NH4 +/SO4 2− in Zabrze in August). It accounts for no correlation between NOx and SIA.
It does not mean that PM1-related SO4 2− and NO3 − could not be totally neutralized (cation/anion equivalent ratio ~1). Instead, it suggests the existence of other than (NH4)2SO4 and NH4NO3 components of PM1 in Zabrze, such as NaNO3 and Ca(NO3)2 in summer and K2SO4 in winter (biomass combustion). At both sites, EF for Ca2+ and K+ in PM1 were high, suggesting their anthropogenic (combustion) origin instead of usually attributed to them relation with PM1 through oxides occurring in soil.
The OC and EC contents of PM1 presented here were determined with the use of a thermal-optical analyzer. It yields other OC/EC in PM1 than the thermal method applied by the authors in 2009 to PM2.5 (Rogula-Kozłowska et al. 2012). Organic carbon is a major form of carbon in PM1. Its mass contribution to PM1 is much greater than the EC contribution. In Zabrze in 2009, the concentrations of PM1- and PM2.5-related OC + EC were close, therefore both methods are supposed to measure them correctly (Table 1, Rogula-Kozłowska et al. 2012). But in the present paper, the actual (correct) OC/EC in fine dust in southern Poland is presented for the first time.
The monthly OC/EC in summer (August, September) are higher than in winter in both Zabrze and Racibórz. They were higher in Racibórz than in Zabrze for particular months. It may be due to the absence of traffic-related fine dust sources in Racibórz (submicrometer particles of soot, Japar et al. 1986). The higher summer than winter and rural than urban OC/EC were also observed in England in 2004–2005 (Harrison and Yin 2008), but OC/EC in southern Poland is in average two times greater than in England; it is also greater than OC/EC in Barcelona in 2005–2006 (Pérez et al. 2008).
Oxidizing organic vapors may be a source of low-volatile organic compounds, which condense to form particles in the air, therefore a source of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) (Grosjean and Seinfeld 1989). SOA may have greater contribution to dust than primary organic aerosol (POA).
Because there is no simple method for separation of secondary (OCsec) and primary carbon in dust-related OC the PM1-related OCsec concentrations in Zabrze and Racibórz were computed from the formula:
where OC and EC are monthly OC and EC concentrations in Zabrze or Racibórz (OC/EC)min is the lowest OC/ECFootnote 1 between the 1st of August and 31st December in Zabrze or Racibórz.
The OCsec concentrations, presented in Table 1, were computed using monthly concentrations and as such they are only approximate values giving only a rough idea about monthly mass contributions of OCsec to PM1.
Figure 1 summarizes all the presented results. The secondary aerosol, SIA + SOM (secondary OM, SOM = 1.4*OCsec) may be more than 50 % of the PM1 mass in the cities of southern Poland (Zabrze). At a rural background sites it is in average by about 10 % lower because of lower SOM contribution to PM1 (worse conditions for SOA formation in Racibórz—probably lower ambient LZO and O3 concentrations). At both sites, SIA contributed to the PM1 mass more in summer, SOM—in winter. In general, the primary components of aerosol, EC + POM (primary organic aerosol, POM = 1.4*(OC−OCsec)) had greater mass contributions to PM1 in Racibórz. At both sites, the greatest POM and EC mass contributions to PM1 occurred in November and December.
In Zabrze and Racibórz, the greatest mass contributions of MC + CM + OE to PM1 occur in August (almost 20 %). In winter this contribution is lower by almost half.
All, the high ambient concentrations of SOM, POM and EC, high mass contributions of carbon compounds (equally, primary and secondary) to PM1 and relatively small differences in the PM1 chemical composition between rural and urban environments confirm the influence of combustion of fossil fuels on the concentrations and chemical composition of PM1 in southern Poland. In cities, besides combustion of wood and coal in heating or power plants and domestic stoves, also road traffic and industry discharge coal compounds into the atmosphere (Juda-Rezler et al. 2011; Sówka et al. 2012)—this accounts for the difference between SOM and POM distribution in urban and rural dust.
The products of the transformations of air pollutants in the cities of southern Poland, where NR is very low and urban aerosol may be acidic, cause serious environmental and health risks.
Notes
The Sunset Laboratory software computes OC/EC for each sample; from among all OC/EC, the lowest ones were selected: 1.9 for Zabrze and 3.1 for Racibórz.
References
Aas W, Tsyro S, Bieber E, Bergström R, Ceburnis D, Ellermann T, Fagerli H, Frölich M, Gehrig R, Makkonen U, Nemitz E, Otjes R, Perez N, Perrino C, Prévôt ASH, Putaud J-P, Simpson D, Spindler G, Vana M, Yttri KE (2012) Lessons learnt from the first EMEP intensive measurement periods. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 12:3731–3780
Carbone C, Decesari S, Mircea M, Giulianelli L, Finessi E, Rinaldi M, Fuzzi S, Marinoni A, Duchi R, Perrino C, Sargolini T, Vardè M, Sprovieri F, Gobbi GP, Angelini F, Facchini MC (2010) Size-resolved aerosol chemical composition over the Italian Peninsula during typical summer and winter conditions. Atmos Environ 44:5269–5278
CEN/TR 16243:2011 (2011) Technical report: ambient air quality—guide for the measurement of elemental carbon (EC) and organic carbon (OC) deposited on filters, technical committee CEN/TC 264 “Air quality”, Brussels
Dockery DW, Stone PH (2007) Cardiovascular risks from fine particulate air pollution. N Engl J Med 356:511–513
EMEP (2011) Transboundary particulate matter in Europe. Status report 4/2011
Englert N (2004) Fine particles and human health—a review of epidemiological studies. Toxicol Lett 149:235–242
Grosjean D, Seinfeld JH (1989) Parameterization of the formation potential of secondary organic aerosols. Atmos Environ 23:1733–1747
Ham WA, Kleeman MJ (2011) Size-resolved source apportionment of carbonaceous particulate matter in urban and rural sites in central California. Atmos Environ 45:3988–3995
Harrison RM, Yin J (2008) Sources and processes affecting carbonaceous aerosol in central England. Atmos Environ 42:1413–1423
Hinds WC (1998) Aerosol technology. Properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Hławiczka S, Dyduch B, Fudala J (2003) Long-Term changes of particulate emission in the industrial region of upper silesia (Poland) and their effect on the acidity of rainwater. Water Air Soil Poll 142:151–163
Japar SM, Brachaczek WW, Gorse RA Jr, Norbeck JM, Pierson WR (1986) The contribution of elemental carbon to the optical properties of rural atmospheric aerosols. Atmos Environ 20:1281–1289
Juda-Rezler K, Reizer M, Oudinet J-P (2011) Determination and analysis of PM10 source apportionment during episodes of air pollution in central Eastern European urban areas: the case of wintertime 2006. Atmos Environ 45:6557–6566
Kappos AD (2011) Health risks of urban airborne particles. Environ Sci Eng 5:527–551
Klejnowski K, Pastuszka JS, Rogula-Kozłowska W, Talik E, Krasa A (2012) Mass size distribution and chemical composition of the surface layer of summer and winter airborne particles in Zabrze, Poland. B Environ Contam Toxicol 88:255–259
Kumar P, Robins A, Vardoulakis S, Britter R (2010) A review of the characteristics of nanoparticles in the urban atmosphere and the prospects for developing regulatory controls. Atmos Environ 44:5035–5052
López-Villarrubia E, Iñiguez C, Peral N, García MD, Ballester F (2012) Characterizing mortality effects of particulate matter size fractions in the two capital cities of the Canary Islands. Environ Res 112:129–138
Makkonen U, Hellén H, Anttila P, Ferm M (2010) Size distribution and chemical composition of airborne particles in south-eastern finland during different seasons and wildfire episodes in 2006. Sci Total Environ 408:644–651
Massey D, Kulshrestha A, Masih J, Habail M, Taneja A (2012) Seasonal trends of PM10, PM5.0, PM2.5 & PM1.0 in indoor and outdoor environments of residential homes located in North-Central India. Build Environ 47:223–231
Oberdörster G, Gelein RM, Ferin J, Weiss B (1995) Association of particulate air pollution and acute mortality: involvement of ultrafne particles? Inhal Toxicol 7:111–124
Pérez N, Pey J, Querol X, Alastuey A, López M, Viana M (2008) Partitioning of major and trace components in PM10–PM2.5–PM1 at an urban site in Southern Europe. Atmos Environ 42:1677–1691
Pope CA, Dockery DW (2006) Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 54:709–742
Putaud J-P, Van Dingenen R, Alastuey A, Bauer H, Birmili W, Cyrys J, Flentje H, Fuzzi S, Gehrig R, Hansson HC, Harrison RM, Herrmann H, Hitzenberger R, Hüglin C, Jones AM, Kasper-Giebl A, Kiss G, Kousa A, Kuhlbush TAJ, Löschau G, Maenhaut W, Molnar A, Moreno T, Pekkanen J, Perrino C, Pitz M, Puxbaum H, Querol X, Rodriguez S, Salma I, Schwarz J, Smolik J, Schneider J, Spindler G, ten Brink H, Tursic J, Viana M, Wiedensohler A, Raes F (2010) A European aerosol phenomenology—3: physical and chemical characteristics of particulate matter from 60 rural, urban, and kerbside sites across Europe. Atmos Environ 44:1308–1320
Querol X, Alastuey A, Rodriguez S, Plana F, Ruiz CR, Cots N, Massague G, Puig O (2001) PM10 and PM2.5 source apportionment in the barcelona metropolitan area, Catalonia. Spain Atmos Environ 35:6407–6419
Rogula-Kozłowska W, Klejnowski K, Rogula-Kopiec P, Mathews B, Szopa S (2012) A study on the seasonal mass closure of ambient fine and coarse dusts in Zabrze, Poland. B Environ Contam Toxical 88:722–729
Saarikoski S (2008) Chemical mass closure and source-specific composition of atmospheric particles. Academic Dissertation. Finnish Meteorological Institute, contributions, no. 74. Helsinki
Sówka I, Zwoździak A, Trzepla-Nabaglo K, Skrętowicz M, Zwoździak J (2012) PM2.5 elemental composition and source apportionment in a residential area of wrocław. Pol Environ Prot Eng 1:73–79
Spindler G, Brüggemann E, Gnauk T, Grüner A, Müller K, Herrmann H (2010) A four-year size-segregated characterization study of particles PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 depending on air mass origin at Melpitz. Atmos Environ 44:164–173
Turpin BJ, Lim H-J (2001) Species contributions to PM2.5 mass concentrations: revisiting common assumptions for estimating organic mass. Aerosol Sci Technol 35:602–610
Vasilakos C, Pateraki S, Veros D, Maggos T, Michopoulos J, Saraga D, Helmis CG (2007) Temporal determination of heavy metals in PM2.5 aerosols in a suburban site of athens. Greece J Atmos Chem 57:1–17
Vecchi R, Marcazzan G, Valli G, Ceriani M, Antoniazzi C (2004) The role of atmospheric dispersion in the seasonal variation of PM1 and PM2.5 concentration and composition in the urban area of milan (Italy). Atmos Environ 38:4437–4446
Wedepohl KH (1995) The composition of the continental crust. Geochim Cosmochem Acta 59:1217–1232
Yin J, Harrison RM (2008) Pragmatic mass closure study for PM1.0, PM2.5 and PM10 at roadside, urban background and rural sites. Atmos Environ 42:980–988
Zwoździak A, Sówka I, Skrzętowicz M, Worobiec A, Nych A, Zwoździak J, Grieken R (2011) PM10, PM2.5 and PM1.0 indoor and outdoor concentrations and chemical composition in school environment. Ecol Chem Eng A 18:933–940
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rogula-Kozłowska, W., Klejnowski, K. Submicrometer Aerosol in Rural and Urban Backgrounds in Southern Poland: Primary and Secondary Components of PM1 . Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 90, 103–109 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-012-0868-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-012-0868-4