Abstract
A survey of the fossil record of land-plant tissues and their damage by arthropods reveals several results that shed light on trophic trends in host-plant resource use by arthropods. All 14 major plant tissues were present by the end of the Devonian, representing the earliest 20 % of the terrestrial biota. During this interval, two types of time lags separate the point between when tissues first originated from their earliest consumption by herbivorous arthropods. For epidermis, parenchyma, collenchyma and xylem, live tissue consumption was rapid, occurring on average 10 m.y. after the earliest tissue records. By contrast, structural tissues (periderm, sclerenchyma), tissues with actively dividing cells (apical, lateral, intercalary meristems), and reproductive tissues (spores, megagametophytes, integuments) experienced approximately a 9-fold (92 m.y.) delay in arthropod herbivory, extending well into the Carboniferous Period. Phloem similarly presents a delay of 85 m.y., but this incongruously long lag-time may be attributed to the lack of preservation of this tissue in early vascular plants. Nevertheless, the presence of phloem can be indicated from planar spaces adjacent well-preserved xylem, or inferred from a known anatomy of the same plant taxon in better preserved material, especially permineralisations. The trophic partitioning of epidermis, parenchyma, phloem and xylem increases considerably to the present, probably a consequence of dietary specialization or consumption of whole leaves by several herbivore functional feeding groups. Structural tissues, meristematic tissues and reproductive tissues minimally have been consumed throughout the fossil record, consistent with their long lags to herbivory during the earlier Paleozoic. Neither angiosperm dominance in floras nor global environmental perturbations had any discernible effect on herbivore trophic partitioning of plant tissues.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Land plants and their arthropod herbivores overwhelmingly structure modern ecosystems (Futuyma and Agrawal 2009), and there is increasing evidence that the interactions between these two hyperdiverse groups has been continual and increasing since the earliest megascopic biotas were established during the later Silurian, approximately 425 Ma (Kenrick and Crane 1997; Bateman et al. 1998). The deep-time ecological relationships between these arguably two most diverse of terrestrial groups has been studied only recently, using a variety of biological (Herrera and Pellmyr 2002; Futuyma and Agrawal 2009) and paleobiological (Wilf et al. 2006; Currano et al. 2010) approaches. Other studies emphasize a more taxonomic approach, in which clades of co-occurring and interacting plants and insects provide examples of co-speciation, co-radiation or co-evolution (Becerra et al. 2009; Kergoat et al. 2011). However, broad patterns that provide the temporal context of trophic dynamics rarely are revealed in recent examinations of deep-time plant–arthropod relationships, indicating a missing link in the inference chain relating plant hosts to their herbivore consumers. Nevertheless, the fossil record of plants, insects and the crucial evidence of inflicted damage and pollination does provide valuable data, trends and sources of inferences (Labandeira 2002) regarding how insects have accessed plants since the mid-Paleozoic.
The diverse paleobotanical and paleoentomological records are only surpassed by the underutilized yet rich record of evidence for their trophic relationships. In particular, these relationships involve the fossil record of arthropod damage (Labandeira et al. 2007) and pollination modes (Labandeira 2010). Although deemed sparse (Futuyma and Agrawal 2009), the fossil record nevertheless is surprisingly robust, particularly for resolving broad patterns in space, time and habitat. The general trophic approach of recorded arthropod-mediated damage on particular plant tissues that I employ here previously has been used to address issues in the fossil history of host-plant use by insects. This rich record has been utilised to determine phenomena such as the regional effects of the end-Cretaceous extinction on plant–insect associations during the succeeding Paleocene (Labandeira et al. 2002; Wappler et al. 2009), the four global phases of plant-arthropod associations (Labandeira 2006a), and evidence for insect herbivore outbreaks at fossil sites (Labandeira 2012).
In this contribution, I examine a finer grained record of plant–arthropod trophic data within the context of a coarse-grained geochronology. In particular, I assess the arthropod herbivore and pollinator use of 14 major types of tissue from the mid Paleozoic to late Cenozoic. This contrasts with an earlier, more generalized examination (Labandeira 2007; Iannuzzi and Labandeira 2008) that documented feeding damage in six types of plant organs for the formative Paleozoic interval representing the beginning of the plant–insect associational record. This study also encompasses and documents specific trophic interactions for the 425 million years from the mid-Paleozoic to the present. It is the first examination in the fossil record of plant–insect interactions wherein plant tissue types consumed by terrestrial arthropod herbivores are tracked through geologic time to assess the availability and partitioning of food resources at the histological level. The intention of the present study is to provide data to address patterns of land-plant tissue use by arthropod herbivores, and to derive general conclusions of trophic evolution from these patterns.
Materials and methods
A data set was assembled consisting of 253 instances of plant-host tissues that exhibit damage for one or more functional feeding groups (FFGs) of herbivorous arthropods (Fig. 1). These records of tissue damage originated from 59 fossil floras that represent two-dimensional compression–adpression and three-dimensionally permineralized states of preservation (Taylor et al. 2009). The data are pegged to a standard global geochronology (Gradstein et al. 2012). Figure 1 presents these data in matrix form, and represents an updated, reorganized, and more finely resolved version of data used in earlier compilations and analyses (Labandeira 2002, 2006a, b, 2007). Data sources can be found in Appendix 1 of the electronic supplementary material which includes unpublished personal observations.
Characterization of plant tissues
Land-plant tissues are categorized into tissue systems, each of which contains multiple tissue types. Tissue types, in turn, consist of cell types (Evert 2006). For example, the ground tissue system consists of parenchyma, collenchyma, sclerenchyma and secretory tissues. Sclerenchyma, in turn, consists of two cell types, fibers and sclereids. Occasionally, there is disagreement among plant anatomists about the extent of inclusion and what constitutes an identifiable tissue system or type. Figure 1 follows the standard fourfold categorization of tissue systems: dermal, ground, vascular and meristematic. However, a fifth category has been added that, although not considered a true tissue system, consists of reproductively associated tissues that typically occur as fossils in the same contexts as those preserving leaves, stems and roots.
Characterization of insect herbivory
FFGs are the fundamental ways that terrestrial herbivorous arthropods (insects, mites and millipedes) consume plant tissues (Table 2). Important for the fossil record, FFGs are recognized in the fossil record by distinctive, often stereotypical, damage patterns that are left on well-preserved plant tissues (Labandeira 2002; Labandeira et al. 2007). The ten FFGs used in Fig. 1 are distributed on tissue-type occurrences throughout the data matrix by a coordinate color scheme. Three FFGs are exophytic, in which the feeding herbivore is positioned outside the consumed tissues: external foliage feeding, palynophagy (the consumption of spores or pollen), and fluid feeding, defined by the imbibing of secretory products such as nectar or glandular exudates. By contrast, endophytic feeding modes, characterized by feeding arthropods entombed within their plant host’s consumable tissues, consists of leaf mining on planar foliar and stem tissues, galling that causes control of the developmental machinery of its host to produce tumor-like swellings, seed predation that results in feeding access to nutritive embryonic tissues, and borings that typically penetrate three-dimensional, often hardened trunk tissues. A third, intermediate, category is recognized where the arthropod herbivore is located externally but feeds on internal tissues; this includes piercing-and-sucking, oviposition and root feeding. Oviposition, while not a true feeding strategy because of the use of a female ovipositor to lay eggs instead of employing mouthparts to feed on tissues, nevertheless has been considered a FFG, as oviposition has generated a distinctive fossil record of diverse plant tissue damage. Root feeding, or rhizophagy, is rare and can occur either within or external to root tissues. Eleven categories FFGs are provided in Fig. 1, including a mixed category indicated in black of more than three FFGs accessing a single tissue type, in part to track elevated levels of host-tissue partitioning through time.
Herbivory is the consumption of live plant tissues, as opposed to detritivory, which is the ingestion of dead plant and other organismic tissues. Separation of herbivory from detritivory in the fossil record follows four explicit criteria, either singly or preferably in combination (Labandeira 2006b). First, for herbivory, it is essential that there is some indication of plant response to a previously induced arthropod trauma. The most common evidence for a plant reaction to herbivory is production of a distinctive tissue, often callus, as a wound response. Second, small structural features at the herbivore-altered plant edge, such as resistant veinal stringers, necrotic tissue flaps, or areas of secondary fungal infection, also indicate herbivory. A third feature is distinctive stereotypy of a feeding pattern on a particular plant tissue, organ or host species. Such specificity would be encountered less frequently for detritivores, which have considerably more eclectic diets than in herbivores. Fourth, important for the more recent part of the record is recognition of a particular feeding syndrome that is present in a closely related and extant descendant lineage with known feeding habits. In practice, the separation of herbivory from detritivory presents few instances of confusion (Labandeira 2002), certain types of skeletonization being the most problematic.
Structure of the study
Table 1 summarizes the important variables depicted in Fig. 1; Appendix 1 of the supplementary material provides data documentation. This study covers the known interval of megascopic terrestrial life for the past 450 m.y. Although recognition of the earliest terrestrial biotas containing discernible plants, arthropods and fungi has been controversial (Gray 1993; Kenrick and Crane 1997), there appears to be an emerging consensus that such an event commenced during the mid- to late Silurian, during Wenlock and Ludlow times (Bateman et al. 1998). The dating of these and more recent events is tied to a recently published time-scale (Gradstein et al. 2012). Plotted within this framework of geologic time and fossil biotas are two fundamental sources of presence/absence data: (1), the 14 land-plant tissue types and (2), the ten FFGs that are plotted from 59 fossil floras in Fig. 1 (Table 2). There are 253 examples of arthropod-damaged plant tissues recorded from these biotas, which are allocated to 530 occurrences of FFGs, yielding an average of 2.09 FFGs per tissue-type occurrence. Each tissue type occurrence harbors from one to six FFGs; four or more FFGs are indicated by a black bar. Within a deposit or flora, an isolated, single, tissue with a single FFG indicates that there was specialized consumption of a single target, such as xylem feeding for a piercer-and-sucker. By contrast, multiple adjacent tissues with multiple FFGs frequently suggest that an entire organ, such as a leaf, was consumed by a single feeding event.
Results
Seven principal results and observations issue from these data and involve the gross nature of the land plant–arthropod associational record throughout their documented ca. 425-m.y. interval of interaction. These results represent a much finer-grained partitioning of the data than other recent findings (Labandeira 2002, 2006a, b, 2007), and offer new insights.
-
(1)
All of the 14 major tissue types were present by the end of the Devonian (359 Ma), within the first 15 % of the entire documented duration of vascular land plants in terrestrial ecosystems. The one histological exception is endosperm, a feature of angiosperm seeds that probably originated during the earliest Cretaceous (Baroux et al. 2002), but whose nutritional precursor, megagametophytic tissue, was present since the origin of the seed habit during the Middle Devonian.
-
(2)
Three major time gaps occur in the record of plant tissue and arthropod herbivore associations. They are an extensive, ca. 41 m.y. gap inclusive of the Late Devonian to almost all the Early Mississippian interval, a smaller 5 m.y. gap during the Early Triassic, and a larger ca. 30 m.y. gap in the Early Jurassic.
-
(3)
There are two major durations of time lags between the first documented appearances of the 14 tissue types and their earliest consumption by insect herbivores (Table 3). These important time lags centre on a set of four tissue types with comparatively rapidly consumed tissues that are characterized by a mean lag time of ca. 10 m.y. A second set of ten tissue types exhibits a 9-fold longer delay of 92 m.y.
-
(4)
The partitioning of basic tissue types by herbivore FFGs appear to increase through time, as measured primarily by the number of tissue types with four or more FFGs.
-
(5)
There are six tissues that rarely were significantly used by arthropod herbivores throughout the studied interval. These minimally utilized tissues are the structural tissues of periderm, collenchyma, and sclerenchyma, as well as the three actively dividing tissues of apical, lateral, and intercalary meristem that dictate plant growth and architecture.
-
(6)
Tissues that have been overwhelmingly accessed by arthropod herbivores during the study interval are the photosynthetic tissues of epidermis and parenchyma, and the water- and nutrient-conducting tissues of xylem and phloem that produce energy-rich products contained in foliage.
-
(7)
Two patterns are evident in these data that are potentially relevant to major biotic and environmental events. There is evidence for the end-Permian extinction having a significant effect on Middle Triassic FFG trophic partitioning of plant tissues. By contrast, there is no signal that angiosperm diversification had an effect on increasing the subsequent subdivision of food resources.
Discussion
Three aspects of the above-mentioned patterns especially merit discussion. All three issues involve the patterns of trophic partitioning of host-plant tissues by insect herbivores across major boundaries or significant events in the history of terrestrial life.
The appearance of plant tissue types and their delayed consumption by arthropod herbivores
Our results indicate short-term lags of ca. 10 m.y. for consumption of live epidermis, parenchyma, collenchyma and xylary tissues of stems that began earlier, during the mid Paleozoic. They also exhibit a pattern of longer-term lags for more resistant structural tissues (periderm, sclerenchyma), actively dividing tissues involved in growth (apical, lateral and intercalary meristems), and reproductively associated tissues (palynomorphs, megagametophytic/endosperm tissue, and integuments). The occurrence of an 85-m.y. lag before the earliest occurrence of phloem and its consumption by herbivores, however, is odd. This unexpected lag for a relatively undefended tissue whose primary function is transporting the energy-rich products of photosynthesis may be attributable to stereotypically poor preservation of this tissue among the earliest vascularized land plants (Kenrick and Crane 1997) or by the lack of suitable terrestrial depositional environments (Labandeira 2007).
The more finely resolved histological data for the Paleozoic in Fig. 1 support a previous study based on different, coarser-grained organ-level data (Labandeira 2007). An example of more fine-grained histological data, used in this compilation, comes from both coal-swamp and better drained peripheral habitats of late Middle compression–adpression floras and early Late Pennsylvanian permineralized floras from the Illinois Basin, USA (Fig. 2). The finely resolved subtypes of external foliage feeding, such as margin feeding and surface abrasion (Fig. 2, top), represent feeding on all foliar tissues. In addition, palynophagy (the consumption of pollen and spores: Fig. 2, center left), and internal modes of feeding on plant hosts that include borings (Fig. 2, lower right), and galls (Fig. 2, bottom) represent the consumption or major alteration of a variety of tissues, such as epidermis, parenchyma, xylem, phloem and meristems (McLoughlin 2011). These and collateral data (e.g., Labandeira 2006b) indicate that the partitioning of tissue types was virtually complete by the end of the Pennsylvanian Subperiod.
Collectively, these data provide evidence of an early microarthropodan launch of herbivory on the stems of early vascular plants and spores and their enveloping sporangia (Kevan et al. 1975; Edwards et al. 1995; Labandeira and Curano 2013), compared with a delay in the use of other organs, including leaf or leaf-like organs such as microphylls, rhizoids and true roots. The consumption of spores and sporangia is contemporaneous with stem herbivory, and reflects a much earlier origin during the mid-Silurian. However, confident attribution of spore taxa to vascular land plants earlier than the mid Silurian remains somewhat contentious.
Possible effects of major perturbations in the consumption of plant tissues by insect herbivores
It is possible that the level of the current analysis is too coarse-grained to capture the effects of major environmental episodes, such as the end-Permian and end-Cretaceous ecological crises, documented in other studies of terrestrial ecosystems across major intervals of environmental change (Labandeira et al. 2002; Labandeira 2006b). However, there does appear to be a significant lessening of FFG partitioning of plant tissues during the Middle Triassic, reversed dramatically in the Late Triassic Molteno biota (Scott et al. 2004; Labandeira 2006b). Other widely recognized trends resulting from major abiotic perturbations, such as the end-Cretaceous environmental crisis and the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum, are not recoverable, at least with the scale presented herein. The addition of significantly more biotas and arthropod-damaged tissue occurrences could result in a substantively more finely resolved dataset. Such data could successfully capture the trophic signals necessary for demonstrating the effects of major environmental crises on tissue use by arthropod herbivores.
Role of angiosperm diversification
The ecological prominence of angiosperms had minimal effect on increased herbivore partitioning of plant tissue types. Based on the data presented, angiosperm diversification evidently had little effect on the FFG partitioning of tissue types. An earlier study (Labandeira 2006a) indicated that the taxonomic diversity of host-plant targets did increase after the establishment of angiosperm-dominated ecosystems (Labandeira 2006a). By contrast, insect mouthpart diversity already had reached modern levels during the pre-angiospermous mid-Jurassic (Labandeira 1997), separately indicating that almost all of the feeding specializations had originated earlier, such as the spectacular long-proboscid pollination mode employed by certain flies, scorpionflies and lacewings (Ren et al. 2009; Labandeira 2010). When considered together, these three observations — the increase in host-plant taxa diversity following the angiosperm diversification event, the pre-angiospermous establishment of a near-complete repertoire of insect feeding specializations (Hartkopf-Fröder et al. 2011), and the absence of herbivore tissue partitioning — indicate that resource partitioning of plant tissues by insect herbivores was unaffected by angiosperm ecological dominance. Although plant tissues were not consumed differently by insect herbivores before and after angiosperm diversification, there likely was a significant subsequent increase in angiosperm biomass as a food resource. This increase probably was attributable to greater vein densities and consequent increased assimilation rates when compared to those of seed plants (Boyce et al. 2009).
References
Banks HP, Colthart BJ (1993) Plant–animal–fungal interactions in Early Devonian trimerophytes from Gaspé, Canada. Am J Bot 80:992–1001
Baroux C, Spillane C, Grossniklaus U (2002) Evolutionary origins of the endosperm in flowering plants. Genome Biol 3(9):1026.1–1026.5
Bateman RM, Crane PR, DiMichele WA, Kenrick PR, Rowe NP, Speck T, Stein WE (1998) Early evolution of land plants: phylogeny, physiology, and ecology of the primary terrestrial radiation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:263–292
Becerra J, Noge K, Venable D (2009) Macroevolutionary chemical escalation in an ancient plant–herbivore arms race. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:18062–18066
Boyce CK, Brodribb TJ, Field TS, Zwieniecki MA (2009) Angiosperm leaf vein evolution was physiologically and environmentally transformative. Proc Roy Soc B 276:1771–1776
Currano ED, Labandeira CC, Wilf P (2010) Fossilized insect folivory tracks temperature for six million years. Ecol Monogr 80:547–567
Edwards D (1990) Constraints on Silurian and Early Devonian phytogeographic analysis based on megafossils. In: McKerrow WS, Scotese GP (eds) Palaeozoic palaeogeography and biogeography. Geological Society, London, pp 233–242
Edwards D (2003) Xylem in early tracheophytes. Pl Cell Environ 26:57–72
Edwards D, Selden PA, Richardson JB, Axe L (1995) Coprolites as evidence for plant–animal interaction in Siluro–Devonian terrestrial ecosystems. Nature 377:329–331
Eggert DA (1974) The sporangium of Horneophyton lignieri (Rhyniophytina). Am J Bot 61:405–413
Evert RF (2006) Esau’s plant anatomy―Meristems, cells and tissues of the plant body: their structure, function and development. Wiley, New York
Futuyma DJ, Agrawal A (2009) Macroevolution and the biologic diversity of plants and herbivores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:18054–18061
Gerienne P, Meyer-Berthaud B, Fairon-Demeret M, Streel M, Steemans P (2004) Runcaria, a Middle Devonian seed plant precursor. Science 306:856–858
Gradstein FM, Ogg JG, Schmitz M, Ogg G (2012) The geologic time scale 2012. Elsevier Science/Butterworth Heinemann, London
Gray J (1993) Major Paleozoic land plant evolutionary events. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclim Palaeoecol 104:153–169
Hartkopf-Fröder C, Rust J, Wappler T, Friis EM, Viehofen A (2011) Mid-Cretaceous charred fossil flowers reveal direct observation of arthropod feeding strategies. Biol Lett 8:295–298
Herrera C, Pellmyr O (2002) Plant–animal interactions: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford
Iannuzzi R, Labandeira CC (2008) The oldest record and early history of insect folivory. Ann Entomol Soc Am 101:79–94
Kenrick P, Crane PR (1991) Water-conducting cells in early fossil land plants: implications for the early evolution of tracheophytes. Bot Gaz 152:335–356
Kenrick P, Crane PR (1997) The origin and early evolution of plants on land. Nature 389:33–39
Kergoat GJ, Le Ru BP, Genson G, Cruaud C, Couloux A, Delobel A (2011) Phylogenetics, species boundaries and timing of resource tracking in a highly specialized group of seed beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Mol Phylo Evol 59:746–760
Kevan PG, Chaloner WG, Savile DBO (1975) Interrelationships of early terrestrial arthropods and plants. Palaeontology 18:391–417
Labandeira CC (1997) Insect mouthparts: ascertaining the paleobiology of insect feeding strategies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:153–193
Labandeira CC (2002) The history of associations between plants and animals. In: Herrera CM, Pellmyr O (eds) Plant–animal interactions: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, London, pp 26–74, 248–261
Labandeira CC (2006a) The four phases of plant–arthropod associations in deep time. Geol Acta 4:409–438
Labandeira CC (2006b) Silurian to Triassic plant and insect clades and their associations: new data, a review, and interpretations. Arthro Syst Phylo 64:53–94
Labandeira CC (2007) The origin of herbivory on land: the initial pattern of live tissue consumption by arthropods. Ins Sci 14:259–274
Labandeira CC (2010) The pollination of mid Mesozoic seed plants and the early history of long-proboscid insects. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 97:469–513
Labandeira CC (2012) Evidence for outbreaks from the fossil record of insect herbivory. In: Barbosa P, Letorneau D, Agrawal A (eds) Insect outbreaks revisited. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 269–290
Labandeira CC, Curano ED (2013) The fossil record of plant–insect dynamics. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 41, in press
Labandeira CC, Johnson KR, Wilf P (2002) Impact of the terminal Cretaceous event on plant–insect associations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:2061–2066
Labandeira CC, Wilf P, Johnson KR, Marsh F (2007) Guide to insect (and other) damage types on compressed plant fossils (version 3.0―spring 2007). Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC
McLoughlin S (2011) New records of leaf galls and arthropod oviposition scars in Permian–Triassic Gondwanan gymnosperms. Austral J Bot 59:156–169
Mamay SH (1962) Occurrence of Pseudobornia Nathorst in Alaska. Palaeobotanist 11:19–22
Powell CL, Edwards D, Trewin NH (2000) A new vascular plant from the Lower Devonian Windyfield chert, Rhynie, NE Scotland. Trans Roy Soc Edinburgh 90:331–349
Remy W, Gensel PG, Hass H (1993) The gametophytic generation of some Early Devonian land plants. Int J Pl Sci 154:35–58
Ren D, Labandeira CC, Santiago-Blay JA, Rasnitsyn AP, Shih CK, Bashkuev A, Logan MAV, Hotton CL, Dilcher DL (2009) A probable pollination mode before angiosperms: Eurasian, long-proboscid scorpionflies. Science 326:840–847
Satterthwait DF, Schopf JW (1972) Structurally preserved phloem tissue in Rhynia. Am J Bot 59:373–376
Scheckler SE, Skog JE, Banks HP (2006) Langoxylon asterochalaenoideum: anatomy and relationships of a fern-like plant from the Middle Devonian of Belgium. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 142:193–217
Scott AC, Anderson JM, Anderson HM (2004) Evidence of plant–insect interactions in the Upper Triassic Molteno Formation of South Africa. J Geol Soc 161:401–410
Stein WE, Berry CM, Hernick LV, Mannolini F (2012) Surprisingly complex community discovered in the mid-Devonian fossil forest at Gilboa. Nature 483:78–81
Taylor TN, Taylor EM, Krings M (2009) Paleobotany: the biology and evolution of fossil plants. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Wang D-M, Hao S-G, Tian L, Xue J-Z (2006) Anatomy of the Late Devonian sphenopsid Rotafolia songziensis, with a discussion of stelar architecture of the Sphenophyllales. Int J Pl Sci 167:373–383
Wappler T, Currano ED, Wilf P, Rust J, Labandeira CC (2009) No post-Cretaceous ecosystem depression in European forests? Rich insect-feeding damage on diverse middle Palaeocene plants, Menat, France. Proc Roy Soc B 276:4271–4277
Wilf P, Labandeira CC, Johnson KR, Ellis B (2006) Decoupled plant and insect diversity after the end-Cretaceous extinction. Science 313:1113–1115
Acknowledgments
This study is an outgrowth of a presentation at the fourth Euro Evo-Devo meeting in Lisbon during July of 2012. Thanks go to Finnegan Marsh for constructing Figs. 1 and 2. Two anonymous reviewers and especially Richard Bateman provided superb reviews. This is contribution 259 of the Evolution of Terrestrial Ecosystems consortium at the National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by: Beverley Glover
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOC 90 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Labandeira, C.C. Deep-time patterns of tissue consumption by terrestrial arthropod herbivores. Naturwissenschaften 100, 355–364 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-013-1035-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-013-1035-4