Abstract
Objectives:
The goal of this study was to evaluate fracture healing and alignment as well as functional outcome and complication risks after internal fixation with the intramedullary proximal humeral nail (PHN). This device shows promise for applications involving the reconstruction of the humeral shaft and head with minimal soft tissue stripping and for providing a locked, fixed-angle construct for secure fixation to permit controlled, early, and active rehabilitation.
Design:
Prospective case-series.
Setting::
Multicenter study in 11 trauma units.
Patients
One-hundred and fifty-one patients were treated for the same number of proximal humerus fractures.
Intervention:
Open reduction and internal fixation with the intramedullary PHN.
Main Outcome Measurements:
Occurrence of postoperative complications during and up to 1 year of follow-up. The patients were actively followed up for 1 year with radiological assessment to observe fracture healing, alignment, reduction, and necrosis and by functional outcome measurements, including Constant, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), and Neer scores.
Results:
A total of 113 patients (77% of 147 surviving patients) were available for the 1-year follow-up assessment, among whom 99% of all examined fractures had healed at this last time point. The range of motion (ROM) of the injured shoulder satisfactorily improved between all of the follow-up periods and by 1 year, 84–92% (ratio of injured to healthy contralateral shoulder) capacity had been achieved for all movements. The Constant score had significantly increased at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups, and by the final 1-year examination, this score attained up to 89% of the contralateral side. The mean baseline DASH was 5.9, with 62% of the total patient population having a zero DASH score. DASH scores higher than the preinjury scores were only observed in patients > 90 years of age, with this score significantly increasing with a mean difference of five points at the 1-year follow-up. At this last examination time point, patients had also reached a "satisfactory" mean Neer score of 85. Intraoperative complications were few (i.e., only four cases were documented) and solely related to the surgical technique; these problems included perforation of the articular surface by the oblique bolt or incorrect positioning of an additional screw. Humeral head necrosis was not common, with only four cases observed. Implant/surgery complications occurred in 63% (30/48) of the patients and included 13 cases of "cut through" (secondary impaction of the humeral head), nine cases of perforation of the articular surface, and four cases of implant loosening. Only four deaths were reported, and all were considered to be purely related to the patient and not to their participation in this study.
Conclusion:
Nailing of proximal humeral fractures with the PHN is possible, but indication is limited to mainly A- and B-type fractures. The results of this multicenter study with many participating surgeons show that the operative technique is demanding and that the majority of documented complications are related to a violation of published basic technical steps during the operative procedure.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Horak J, Nilsson BE. Epidemiology of fractures of the upper end of the humerus. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res 1975;(112):250–253.
Kristiansen B, Barfod G, Bredesen J, Erin-Madsen J, Grum B, Horsnaes MW, Aalberg JR. Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 1987;58:75–77.
Lind T, Kroner K, Jensen J. The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1989;108:285–287.
Szyszkowitz R, Schippinger G. Fractures of the proximal humerus. Unfallchirurgie 1999;102:422–428.
Kuner EH. Fractures of the proximal humerus. Classification and treatment principles. Zeit UnfallchirurgieVersicherungsmedizin Berufskrankheiten 1992;85:156–162.
Hintermann B, Trouillier HH, Schafer D. Rigid internal fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus in older patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000;82:1107–1112.
Schai P, Imhoff A, Staubli AE. Differential diagnosis and therapy of multi-fragment humeral head fracture — an analysis of three clinical studies. Z Unfallchirurgie Versicherungsmedizin Berufskrankheiten 1993;86:27–39.
Speck M, Regazzoni P. 4-fragment fractures of the proximal humerus. Alternative strategies for surgical treatment. Unfallchirurgie 1997;100:349–353.
Wiedemann E, Schweiberer L. Closed treatment of fractures of the humeral head. Indications, technique, limits. Orthopaede 1992;21:106–114.
Resch H, Povacz P, Frohlich R, Wambacher M. Percutaneous fixation of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997;79:295–300.
Speck M, Lang FJ, Regazzoni P. Proximal humeral multiple fragment fractures — failures after T-plate osteosynthesis. Swiss Surg 1996;(2):51–56.
Hessmann M, Baumgaertel F, Gehling H, Klingelhoeffer I, Gotzen L. Plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures with indirect reduction: surgical technique and results utilizing three shoulder scores. Injury 1999;30:453–462.
Brooks CH, Revell WJ, Heatley FW. Vascularity of the humeral head after proximal humeral fractures. An anatomical cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993;75:132–136.
Kuner EH, Siebler G. Dislocation fractures of the proximal humerus — results following surgical treatment. A follow-up study of 167 cases. Unfallchirurgie 1987;13:64–71.
Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) [Corrected]. The Upper Extremity Colloborative Group (UECG) [Published erratum appears in American Journal of Industrial Medicine 1996 Sep; 30(3):372]. Am J Ind Med 1999;29:602–608.
Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J. The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Springer, Berlin, 1990.
Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970;52:1077–1089.
Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987;214:160–164.
Blum J, Hessmann MH, Rommens PM. Behandlung proximaler metaphysärer Humerusfrakturen mit Verriegelungsmarknagelung und Spiralklinge — erste Erfahrungen mit einem neuen Implantat. Akt Traumatol 2003;33:7–13.
Blum J, Rommens PM. Proximale Verriegelung von Humerusmarknägeln und Verletzungsrisiko des N. axillaris. Unfallchirurg 2002;105:9–13.
Blum J, Engelmann R, Küchle R, Hansen M, Rommens PM. Intramedullary nailing of humeral head and humeral shaft fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2007;33:149–158.
Mittlmeier TW, Stedtfeld HW, Ewert A, Beck M, Frosch B, Grad l. Stabilization of proximal humeral fractures with an angular and shielding stable antegrade locking nail (Targon PH). J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:136–146.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blum, J., Hansen, M., Müller, M. et al. Proximal humeral fractures and intramedullary nailing: Experience with a new nail system. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 35, 489–498 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-009-8091-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-009-8091-7