Abstract
In Experiment 1, 12 senior citizens from the community were trained with 18 sets of conditional discriminations. Training included 2-, 3-, and 4-choice matching-to-sample (MTS) configurations in linear series (LS), many-to-one (MTO), and one-to-many (OTM) training structures. Training structure order was counterbalanced across participants. The design permitted tests for class establishment ranging from 2 classes of 3 stimuli each to 4 classes of 4 stimuli each in the LS, MTO, and OTM structures. The experiment tested the hypothesis that 3- and 4-choice MTS would increase the probability of class establishment, relative to 2-choice MTS, by reducing the potential for sample/S- control to arise during training. Results showed, however, that training with 3- and 4-choice MTS did not significantly increase equivalence class establishment and unequivocal evidence of sample/S- control was found in only 1 instance of a 2-choice training and testing structure. Experiment 2 systematically replicated Experiment 1 with 6 additional senior citizens in a O-s delayed MTS paradigm. As in Experiment 1, equivalence class establishment was not related to number of choice stimuli. The delayed MTS paradigm, however, required fewer training trials to establish the conditional relations and led to more class establishment overall. The results are compared to data from previous studies with younger and older participants.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
ADAMS, B. J., FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1993). Effects of test order on intersubject variability during equivalence class formation. The Psychological Record, 43, 133–152.
ARNTZEN, E., & HOLTH, P. (1997). Probability of stimulus equivalence as a function of training design. The Psychological Record, 47, 309–320.
ARNTZEN, E., & HOLTH, P. (2000). Equivalence outcome in single subjects as a function of training structure. The Psychological Record, 50, 603–628.
BOELENS, H. (1994). A traditional account of stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 44, 587–605.
BUFFINGTON, D. M., FIELDS, L., & ADAMS, B. J. (1997). Enhancing the formation of equivalence classes by pretraining of other equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 47, 1–20.
CARRIGAN, P. F., & SIDMAN, M. (1992). Conditional discrimination and equivalence relations: A theoretical analysis of control by negative stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 183–204.
FIELDS, L., ADAMS, B. J., VERHAVE, T., & NEWMAN, S. (1990). The effects of nodality on the formation of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 345–358.
FIELDS, L., HOBBIE-REEVE, S. A., ADAMS, B. J., & REEVE, K. F. (1999). Effects of training directionality and class size on equivalence class formation by adults. The Psychological Record, 49, 703–723.
FIELDS, L., LANDON-JIMENEZ, D. V., BUFFINGTON, D. M., & ADAMS, B. J. (1995). Maintained nodal-distance effects in equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 129–154.
FIELDS, L., REEVE, K. F., ROSEN, D., VARELAS, A., ADAMS, B. J., BELANICH, J., & HOBBIE, S. A. (1997). Using the simultaneous protocol to study equivalence class formation: The facilitating effects of nodal number and size of previously established equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 367–389.
FIELDS, L, & VERHAVE, T. (1987). The structure of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 317–332.
HOLTH, P., & ARNTZEN, E. (1998). Stimulus familiarity and the delayed emergence of stimulus equivalence or consistent nonequivalence. The Psychological Record, 48, 81–110.
HOLTH, P., & ARNTZEN, E. (2000). Reaction times and the emergence of class consistent responding: A case for precurrent responding? The Psychological Record, 50, 305–337.
JOHNSON, C., & SIDMAN, M. (1993). Conditional discrimination on equivalence relations: Control by negative stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 333–347.
SAUNDERS, K. J., SAUNDERS, R. R., WILLIAMS, D. C., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1993). An interaction of instructions and training design on stimulus class formation: Extending the analysis of equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 725–744.
SAUNDERS, R. R., DRAKE, K. M., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1999). Equivalence class establishment, expansion, and modification in preschool children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 195–214.
SAUNDERS, R. R., & GREEN, G. (1999). A discrimination analysis of training-structure effects on stimulus equivalence outcomes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 117–137.
SAUNDERS, R. R., WACHTER, J., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1988). Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member equivalence class via conditional discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 95–115.
SIDMAN, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5–13.
SIDMAN, M. (1987). Two choices are not enough. Behavior Analysis, 22, 11–18.
SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
SIDMAN, M., KIRK, B., & WILLSON-MORRIS, M. (1985). Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 21–42.
SKINNER, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
SPRADLIN, J. E., COTTER, V. W., & BAXLEY, N. (1973). Establishing a conditional discrimination without direct training: A study of transfer with retarded adolescents. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 556–566.
SPRADLIN, J. E., & SAUNDERS, R. R. (1986). The development of stimulus classes using match-to-sample procedures: Sample classification versus comparison classification. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 6, 41–58.
STEELE, D., & HAYES, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519–555.
URCUIOLI, P. J., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1993). A test of comparison-stimulus substitutability following one-to-many matching by pigeons. The Psychological Record, 43, 745–759.
URCUIOLI, P. J., ZENTALL, T. R., JACKSON-SMITH, P., & STEIRN, J. N. (1989). Evidence for common coding to many-to-one matching: Retention, intertriai interference, and transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 264–273.
WILSON, K. M., & MILAN, M. A. (1995). Age differences in the formation of equivalence classes. Journal of Gerontology, 50B, 212–218.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Preparation of the manuscript was supported in part by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grants HD02528 and HD18955 to the Schiefelbusch Institute for Life Span Studies, University of Kansas.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saunders, R.R., Chaney, L. & Marquis, J.G. Equivalence Class Establishment with Two-, Three-, and Four-Choice Matching to Sample by Senior Citizens. Psychol Rec 55, 539–559 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395526
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395526