Abstract
Some children with autism have difficulty acquiring tacts, despite their ability to mand, echo words, and imitate actions. The current study focused on 2 nonvocal children who had acquired a few mands using sign language, but had repeatedly failed to acquire signed tacts. Two procedures were compared to determine the most effective approach for training tacts to these participants. One procedure (the standard condition) used the general verbal prompt “What is that?” The other procedure (the intra verbal condition) used a specific intraverbal prompt “Sign [spoken word].” The results showed that both participants acquired nonimitative verbal responses during the intraverbal condition but not during the standard condition. One participant demonstrated complete transfer to pure tacts, and the other participant showed a partial transfer to pure tacts. These results have implications for the design of language intervention programs for children with autism who have difficulty acquiring tacts.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bijou, S. W., & Ghezzi, P. M. (1999). The behavioral interference theory of autistic behavior in young children. In P. M. Ghezzi, W. L. Williams, & J. E. Carr (Eds.), Autism: Behavior analytic perspectives (pp. 33–43). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Carroll, R. J., & Hesse, B. E. (1987). The effects of alternating mand and tact training on the acquisition of tacts. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 55–65.
Drash, P. W., High, R. L., & Tutor, R. M. (1999). Using mand training to establish an echoic repertoire in young children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 16, 29–44.
Glat, R., Gould, K., Stoddard, L. T., & Sidman, M. (1994). A note on the transfer of stimulus control in the delayed-cue procedure: Facilitation by an overt differential response. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 699–704.
Guess, D., Sailor, W. S., & Baer, D. (1976). A functional speech and language training program for the severely handicapped. Lawrence, KS: H & H Enterprises.
Kent, L. (1974). The language acquisition program. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
Lovaas, O. I. (1977). The autistic child: Language development through behavior modification. New York: Irvington.
Lovaas, O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in children with autism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 6–9.
Maurice, C., Green, G., & Luce, S. C. (1996). Behavior interventions for young children with autism. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Michael, J. (1993a). Concepts and principles of behavior analysis. Kalamazoo, MI: Society for the Advancement of Behavior Analysis.
Michael, J. (1993b). Establishing operations. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 191–206.
Partington, J. W., Sundberg, M. L., Newhouse, L., & Spengler, S. M. (1994). Overcoming an autistic child’s failure to acquire a tact repertoire. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 733–734.
Singh, N. N., & Solman, R. T. (1990). A stimulus control analysis of the picture-word problem in children who are mentally retarded: The blocking effect. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 525–532.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Smith, T. (1993). Autism. In T. R. Giles (Ed.), Handbook of effective psychotherapy (pp. 107–133). New York: Plenum.
Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism or other developmental disabilities. Pleasant Hill, CA: Behavior Analysts, Inc.
Terrace, H. S. (1963). Discriminative learning with and without errors. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 127.
Touchette, P. E. (1971). Transfer of stimulus control: Measuring the moment of transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 347–354.
Ulman, J. D., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1975). Multielement baseline design in educational research. In E. Ramp & G. Semb (Eds.), Behavior analysis: Areas of research and application (pp. 377–391). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Urcuioli, P. J. (1984). Overshadowing in matching-to-sample: Reduction in sample-stimulus control by differential sample behaviors. Animal Learning & Behavior, 12, 256–264.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sundberg, M.L., Endicott, K. & Eigenheer, P. Using Intraverbal Prompts to Establish Tacts for Children with Autism. Analysis Verbal Behav 17, 89–104 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392958
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392958