Summary
Repeatability, a concept derived from quantitative genetics theory, is a statistic that describes the degree to which variation within individuals contributes to total variation in a population. Its usual application has been to set an upper limit on heritability but it may also be useful for studies of stereotypy of behavior. The repeatability of the production of male mating signals gives information both about whether males differ sufficiently for selection to act and whether the differences could be appreciably heritable. Measures of the repeatability of female mating preferences will provide data that can describe the preference functions used in mathematical models of the evolution of sexually selected traits, as well as putting an upper bound on the heritability of preferences. A survey of the few measures in the literature shows that the repeatability of male signal production varies substantially (range 0.21–0.85) and does not necessarily reflect heritability. The repeatabilities of female preferences have not been published previously: for the response to conspecific pheromones by female flour beetles (Tribolium castaneum), my best estimate is zero. Measuring the repeatability of other traits such as parental care and foraging behavior may also lead to insights about selection on and the evolution of these traits.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arnold, S. J. (1981) Behavioral variation in natural populations. II. The inheritance of a feeding response in crosses between geographic races of the garter snake,Thamnophis elegans.Evolution 35, 510–15.
Bakker, T. C. M. (1986) Aggressiveness in sticklebacks (Gasteroesteus aculeatus L.): a behaviour—genetic study.Behaviour 98, 1–144.
Boag, P. T. (1983) The heritability of external morphology in Darwin's ground finches (Geospiza) on Isla Daphne Major, Galapagos.Evolution 37, 877–94.
Boake, C. R. B. (1986) A method for testing adaptive hypotheses of mate choice.Amer. Natur. 127, 654–66.
Bradbury, J. W. and Andersson, M. B. (eds) (1987)Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives. Dahlem Konferenzen. John Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Butlin, R. K. and Hewitt, G. M. (1986) Heritability estimates for characters under sexual selection in the grasshopper,Chorthippus brunneus.Anim. Behav. 34, 1256–61.
Charlesworth, B. (1987) The heritability of fitness.Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives. J. W. Bradbury and M. B. Andersson (eds), pp. 21–40. Dahlem Konferenzen. John Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Du, J.-W., Lofstedt, C. and Lofqvist, J. (1987) Repeatability of pheromone emissions from individual female ermine mothsYponomeuta padellus andYponomeuta rorellus.J. Chem. Ecol. 13, 1431–41.
Falconer, D. S. (1981)Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd edn. Longman, NY, USA.
Findlay, C. S. and Cooke, F. (1983) Genetic and environmental components of clutch size variance in a wild population of lesser snow geese (Anser caerulescens caerulescens).Evolution 37, 724–34.
Fisher, R. A. (1958)The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, 2nd edn. Dover, NY, USA.
Gerhardt, H. C. (1982) Sound pattern recognition in some North American treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): Implications for mate choice.Amer. Zool. 22, 581–95.
Gibson, R. M. and Bradbury, J. W. (1985) Sexual selection in lekking sage grouse: phenotypic correlates of mating success.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18, 117–23.
Hedrick, A. V. (1986) Female preferences for male calling bout duration in a field cricket.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19, 73–7.
Hedrick, A. V. (1988) Female choice and the heritability of attractive male traits: an empirical study.Amer. Natur. 132, 267–76
Heisler, I. L. (1984) A quantitative genetic model for the origin of mating preferences.Evolution 38, 1283–95
Heisler, I. L. (1985) Quantitative genetic models of female choice based on ‘arbitrary’ male characters.Heredity 55, 187–98.
Hoy, R. R., Pollack, G. S. and Moiseff, A. (1982) Species-recognition in the field cricket,Teleogryllus oceanicus: behavioral and neural mechanisms,Amer. Zool. 22, 597–607.
Kirkpatrick, M. (1985) Evolution of female choice and male parental investment in polygynous species: the demise of the ‘sexy son’.Amer. Natur. 125, 788–810.
Kirkpatrick, M. (1986) The handicap mechanism of sexual selection does not work.Amer. Natur. 127, 222–40.
Lande, R. (1976) Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution.Evolution 30, 314–34.
Lande, R. (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits.Pr. Nat. Acad. Sci., US 78, 3721–5.
Lessells, C. M. and Boag, P. T. (1987) Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake.Auk 104, 116–21.
Lloyd, J. E. (1966) Studies on the flash communication system inPhotinus fireflies.Misc. Publs. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 130, 1–95.
Machlis, L., Dodd, P. W. D. and Fentress, J. C. (1985) The pooling fallacy: problems arising when individuals contribute more than one observation to the data set.Z. Tierpsychol. 68, 201–14.
Mather, K. and Jinks, J. L. (1971)Biometrical Genetics. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
Maynard Smith, J. (1978)The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C. and McClearn, G. E. (1980)Behavioral Genetics: A Primer, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, USA.
Schoener, T. W. (1987) A brief history of optimal foraging ecology.Foraging Behavior. A. C. Kamil, J. R. Krebs and H. R. Pulliam (eds), pp. 5–67. Plenum Press, New York, USA.
Shaffer, H. B. and Lauder, G. V. (1985) Patterns of variation in aquatic ambystomatid salamanders: kinematics of the feeding mechanism.Evolution 39, 83–92.
Shaw, R. G. (1987) Maximum-likelihood approaches applied to quantitative genetics of natural populations.Evolution 41, 812–26.
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. (1981)Biometry, 2nd edn. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, USA.
Sokolowski, M. B. (1986)Drosophila larval foraging behavior and correlated behaviors.Evolutionary Genetics of Invertebrate Behavior: Progress and Prospects. M. D. Huettel (ed.), pp. 197–213. Plenum Press, New York, USA.
Thornhill, R. (1983) Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionflyHarpobittacus nigriceps.Amer. Natur. 122, 765–88.
Travis, J. and Woodward, B. D. (1989) Social context and courtship flexibility in male sailfin mollies,Poecilia Labipinna (Pisces: Poeciliidae). In PressAnim. Behav.
Walker, T. J. (1975) Effects of temperature on rates in poikilotherm nervous systems: evidence from the calling songs of meadow katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae:Orchelimum) and reanalysis of published data.J. Comp. Physiol. 101, 57–69.
Wallin, A. (1988) The genetics of foraging behaviour: artificial selection for food choice in larvae of the fruitfly,Drosophila melanogaster.Anim. Behav. 36, 106–14.
White, J. M., Vinson, W. E. and Pearson, R. E. (1981) Dairy cattle improvement and genetics.J. Dairy Sci. 64, 1305–17.
Zeh, D. W. (1987) Life history consequences of sexual dimorphism in a chernetid pseudoscorpion.Ecology 68, 1495–1501.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boake, C.R.B. Repeatability: Its role in evolutionary studies of mating behavior. Evol Ecol 3, 173–182 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270919
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270919