Abstract
The definition of countertransference ranges from pathological and inappropriate responses of the psychotherapist/psychoanalyst based on inner issues and conflicts (hence an obstacle to cure) to a position that countertransference feelings and reactions provide useful information in understanding the patient and contribute constructively to the curative process. This later definition can enhance and expand the analytic inquiry. However, with this expanded conceptualization, abuses of countertransference can have damaging impact on the patient. This presentation will undertake to explore one aspect of such abuse and speak to the specific influences that contribute to the misuse of countertransference in the therapeutic situation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Balint, A., & Balint, M. (1939). On transference and countertransference.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 20, 223–230.
Bion, W. (1962).Learning from experiences. New York: Basic Books. Reprinted inSeven servants. New York: Jason Aronson, 1977.
Epstein, L. & Feiner, A.H. ed. (1979).Countertransference. New York: Jason Aronson.
Fairbairn, W.R.D. (1952).An object relations theory of personality. New York: Basic Books.
Ferenczi, S. (1920).Further contributions to the theory and technique of psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press, 177–180; 198–217.
Freud, S. (1910). The future prospects of psycho-analytic therapy.Standard Edition (11: 141–151). London: The Hogarth Press.
Freud, S. (1915). Observations in transference-love.Standard Edition (12: 159–171), London: The Hogarth Press.
Freud, S. (1937). Analysis terminable and interminable.Standard Edition (23:209–253). London: The Hogarth Press.
Fromm, E. (1947).Man for himself. New York: Rinehart and Winston.
Gill, M.M. (1983). The interpersonal paradigm and the degree of the therapist's involvement.Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 19:200–237.
Greenberg, J. & Mitchell, S. (1983).Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Harvard University Press.
Gorkin, M. (1987).The uses of countertransference. Jason Aronson.
Heimann, P. (1950). On countertransference.International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 31:81–84.
Kohut, O. (1965). Notes on countertransference.Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 13:38–56.
Kernberg, O. (1977).Restoration of the self. New York: International Universities Press.
Langs, R. (1975). Therapeutic misalliance.International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 4:77–105.
Langs, R. (1976a).The therapeutic interaction, Vol. 2. New York: Jason Aronson.
Levenson, E. (1972).The fallacy of understanding. New York: Basic Books.
Little, M. (1951). Countertransference and the patient's response to it.International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 32:32–40.
Little, M. (1957). “R”-the analyst's total response to his patient's needs.International Journal of Psycho-Analysis. 38:240–254.
Modell, A. (1975). A narcissistic defense against affects and the illusion of self-sufficiency.International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, Vol. 56, p. 275–282.
Orr, D.W. (1954). Transference and countertransference: A historical survey.Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 2:621–670.
Racker, H. (1957). The meanings and uses of countertransference.Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 26:303–357.
Racker, H. (1968).Transference and countertransference. New York: International University Press.
Reich, A. (1951). On countertransference.International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 32:25–31.
Reich, A. (1960). Further remarks on countertransference.International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 41:389–395.
Sullivan, H.S. (1953).The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: W.W. Norton.
Winnicott, D.W. (1949). Hate in the countertransference.International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 30:69–75.
Winnicott, D.W. (1960).Maturational processes and the facilitating environment. New York: International Universities Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teitelbaum, S. Countertransference and its potential for abuse. Clin Soc Work J 19, 267–277 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00754723
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00754723