Abstract
In order to determine the reliability of the Cobb angle measurement as it is used in the clinical management of scoliosis, a methodological survey was carried out. In the measurement of a Cobb angle two phases can be distinguished: (a) the production of a spinal radiograph and (b) the measurement of the angle itself. In respect of the first phase, the variation in production of the radiographs was calculated on Cobb angle measurements made by one investigator on serial radiographs of patients who underwent spinal fusion for scoliosis and therefore had a fixed spinal curvature. For the second phase, the accuracy of Cobb angle measurement was investigated by comparing measurements on the same radiographs of 46 scoliosis patients obtained by three investigators, namely two orthopaedic surgeons and an orthopaedic fellow who was assigned to a school screening project. Results were expressed as a Spearman correlation coefficient and a standard deviation of the differences. The Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.98 for the repeated radiographs (production variation) and also 0.98 for the repeated measurements on one radiograph (interobserver measurement variation). The standard deviation of the differences in Cobb angle for the repeated radiographs amounted to 3.2° and for the repeated measurements on one radiograph it was 2.0°. Although there is a good reproducibility of the Cobb angle measurement between different investigators, the variation in production of a spinal radiograph is an important source of error. This should be taken into account when making decisions in scoliosis management.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Beekman MS, Hall V. Variability of scoliosis measurement from spinal roentgenograms. Phys Ther 1979; 6: 764–765.
Goldberg MS, Poitras B, Mayo NE, Labelle H, Bourassa R, Cloutier R. Observer variation in assessing spinal curvature and skeletal development in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1988; 13: 1371–1377.
Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, Kehl D, Cowie GH. Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 1990; 72 A: 320–327.
Sevastikoglou JA, Bergquist E. Evaluation of the reliability of radiological methods for registration of scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand 1969; 40: 608–613.
Desmet AA, Goin JE, Asher MA, Scheuch HG. A clinical study of the differences between the scoliotic angles measured on posteroanterior and anteroposterior radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg 1982; 64 [Am]: 489–493.
Schumpe G, Hofmann P, Rössler H. Problematik der Verlaufskontrolle bei Skoliosepatienten. Z Orthop 1984; 122: 243–254.
Cobb JR. Outline for the study of scoliosis. Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Ann Arbor: JW Edwards, 1948; 5: 261.
Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG. Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg 1990; 72 [Am]: 328–333.
Pruijs JEH, Keessen W, Meer vd R, Hageman MAPE, Wieringen van JC. Spinal rotation meter, development and test of a new device. Poster exhibit, 52nd Annual Meeting of the Scoliosis Research Society, Minneapolis, 21–25 Sept 1991.
Pruijs JEH, Keessen W, Meer vd R, Hageman MAPE, Wieringen van JC. School screening for scoliosis: methodological considerations. Spine 1992; 17: 431–436.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We regret to inform the reader of the sudden and unexpected death on 4 December 1993 of our colleague, Dr. W. Keessen, initiator of this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pruijs, J.E.H., Hageman, M.A.P.E., Keessen, W. et al. Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis. Skeletal Radiol. 23, 517–520 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223081
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223081