Abstract
There have been few investigations of the possible effects of validamycin on the enzymatic activities in soil. The objective of this present work was to study the short-term influence of enzymatic activity in validamycin treated soils. The results showed that high dose of validamycin introduced into soil had an significant effect on soil enzymatic activities, the degree of inhibition or promotion of enzymatic activities was not only related to the concentration of validamycin, but also to the remain time. Compared with the control (non treatment with validamycin), 240 ml.mg−1 validamycin treatment caused a significant decrease (14%) of soil catalase activity; validamycin also inhibited urease activity to 67.3%, but subsequently, validamycin stimulated its activity higher than that of the control. Only the highest dose stimulated acid phophatase activities by 29.7%, and other concentration treatments had no effects on these enzymatic activities. The above results indicated that validamycin had effects on soil enzyme, but the effective time was short. It is also interesting to speculate that validamycin can be easily used by the soil microorganism as carbon source and energy.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Asano, N., Takeuchi, M., Ninomiya, K., Kameda, Y., & Matsui, K. (1984). Microbial degradation of validamycin A by Flavobacterium saccharophilum. Enzymatic cleavage of C-N linkage in validoxylamine A. Journal of Antibiotic 37, 859.
Boyd, S.A., & Mortland, M.M. (1990). Enzyme interactions with clays and clay-organic matter complexes. In Bollag, J.-M., Stotzky, G. (Eds.). Soil biochemistry (pp. 1–28), Vol. 6. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Dewhurst, I.C. (2001). Toxicological assessment of biological pesticides. Toxicology Letters, 120, 67–72.
Dick, R.P. (1997). Soil enzyme activities as integrative indicators of soil health. In Pankhurst C.E., Doube B.M., Gupta V.V.S.R. (Eds.). Biological indicators of soil health (pp. 121–156). Wallingford: CAB International.
Dick, R.P., Breakwill, D., & Turco, R.F. (1996). Soil enzyme activities and biodiversity measurements as integrating biological indicators. In Doran, J. W., Jones, A. J. (Eds.). Handbook of methods for assessment of soil quality. Soil Science Society of America, Wis: Madison, pp. 247– 272.
Dick, R.P. (1994). Soil enzyme activities as indicators of soil quality. In Doran, J.W., Coleman, D.C., Bezdicek, D.F., Stewart, B.A. (Eds.), Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment american society of agronomy (pp. 107–124), WI: Madison.
Dimitrios, G.K., & Allan, W. (2000). Factors influencing the ability of Pseudomonas putida epI to degrade ethoprophos in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32, 1753–1762.
Donegan, K.K., Palm, C.J., Fieland, V.J., Porteous, L.A., Ganio, L.M., Schallr, D.L., Bucal, L.Q., & Seidler, R.J. (1995). Changes in levels, species and DNA fingerprints of soil microorganisms associated with cotton expressing the Bt. Applied Soil Ecology, 2(2), 111–124.
Gianfreda, L., & Bollag, J. M. (1996). Influence of natural and anthropogenic factors on enzyme activity in soil. In Stotzky, G, Bollag, J.-M. (Eds.) Soil biochemistry, vol. 9 (pp. 123–194), New York: Dekker.
Hoffmann, G.G., & Teicher, K. (1961). Ein Kolorimetrisches Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Urease Aktivitat in Boden. Z. Pflanzenerna hr. Bodenk, 91, 55–63.
Ladd, J.N., & Butler, J.H.A. (1975). Humus-enzyme systems and synthetic organic polymer-enzyme analogs. In Paul, E.A., McLaren, A.D. (Eds.). Soil biochemistry, vol. 3 (pp. 143–194). New York: Marcel Dekker.
Ladd, J.N., & Butler, J.H.A. (1975). Humus-enzyme systems and synthetic organic polymer-enzyme analogs. In Paul, E.A., McLaren, A.D. (Eds.), Soil biochemistry, vol. 3 (pp. 143–194). New York: Marcel Dekker.
Ladd, J.N., Foster, R.C., Nannipieri, P., & Oades, J.M. (1996). Soil structure and biological activity. In: Stotzky, G., Bollag, J.M. Rao, M.A. et al. (Eds.), Soil biology & biochemistry, Vol. 32 (pp. 1007–1014).
Marcote, I., Hernandez, T., Garcia, C., & Polo, A. (2001). Influence of one or two successive annual applications of organic fertilizes on the enzyme activity of a soil under barley cultivation. Bioresource Technology, 79, 147–154.
Margesin, R., Zimmerbauer, A., & Schinner, F. (2000). Monitoring of bioremediation by soil biological activities. Chemosphere, 40, 339–346.
McLaren, A.D., & Packer, L. (1970). Some aspects of enzyme reactions in heterogeneous systems. Advances in Enzymology, 33, 245–308.
Megharaj, M., Singleton, I., Kookana, R., & Naidu, R. (1999). Persistence and effects of fenamiphos on native algal populations and enzymatic activities in soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 31, 1549–1553.
Meister, R.T. (1994). Farm chemicals handbook ’94. Willoughby, OH: Meister Publishing Company.
Nannipieri, P. (1994). The potential use of soil enzymes as indicators of productivity, sustainability and pollution. In Pankhurst, C.E., Doube, B.M., Gupta, V.V.S.R., Grace, P.R. (Eds.). Soil biota: Management in sustainable farming systems (pp. 238–244). Australia: CSIRO.
Nannipieri, P., Ceccanti, B., Cervelli, S., & Matarese, E. (1980). Extraction of phosphatase, urease, protease, organic carbon and nitrogen from soil. Soil Science of Social American Journal, 44, 1011–1016.
Nannipieri, P., & Gianfreda, L., (1998). Kinetics of enzyme reactions in soil environment. In Huang, P. M., Senesi, N., Bue, J. (Eds.). Structure and surface reactions of soil particles (pp. 449–479). New York: Wiley.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). (1993). Registry of toxic effects of chemical substances (RTECS). NIOSH. Cincinnati: OH.
Pimentel, D. (2002). Silent spring revisited–have things changed since 1962? Pesticide Outlook, 13(5), 205– 206.
Pimentel, D., & Levitan, L. (1986). Pesticides: Amounts applied and amounts reaching pests. Bioscience Plant Protection Technology and Extension, 17(6), 35–37.
Rao, M.A., Violante, A., & Gianfreda, L. (2000). Interaction of acid phosphatase with clays, organic molecules and organo-mineral complexes: kinetics and stability. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32, 1007–1014.
Schinner, F., Olinger, R., Kandeler, E., & Margesin, R. (1996). Methods in soil biology. New York: Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
Shen, Y. (1997). Recent progression the research and development in agricultural antibiotics.
Tabatabai, M.A. (1994). Soil enzymes. In Weaver R.W., Angle, J.S., Bottomley, P.S. (Eds.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Microbiological and biochemical properties. SSSA book series no. 5. SSSA (pp. 775–833), Wis: Madison.
Tapp, H., & Stotzky, G. (1995). Insecticidal activity of the toxins from Bacilluc thuringigensis subsp. Kurstaki and Tenebrionis adsorbed and bound on pure and soil clays. Applied and Enivronmental Microbiology, 61(5), 1786–1790.
Theng, B.K.G. (1979). Formation and properties of clay-polymer complexes. New York: Elsevier.
Thomson, W.T. (1982). Agricultural chemicals book IV fungicides. Fresno, CA: Thomson Publications.
vanBeelen, P.V., & Doelman, P. (1997). Significance and application of microbial toxicity tests in assessing ecotoxicological risks of contaminants in soil and sediment. Chemosphere, 34, 455–499.
Wu, W., Ye, Q., & Min, H. (2004a). Effect of straws from Bt-transgenic rice on selected biological activities in water-flooded soil. European Journal of Soil Biology. 40, 15–22.
Wu, W., Ye, Q., Min, H., Duan, X., & Jin, W. (2004b). Bt-transgenic rice straw affects the culturable microbiota and dehydrogenase and phosphatase activities in a flooded paddy soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36, 289–295.
Xu, G.H., & Zheng, H.Y. (1986). Handbook of analysis of soil microorganism. Beijing: Agriculture Press, pp. 249–291 (in Chinese).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qian, H., Hu, B., Wang, Z. et al. Effects of validamycin on some enzymatic activities in soil. Environ Monit Assess 125, 1–8 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9211-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9211-z