Abstract
The matching of specific new physics scenarios onto the SMEFT framework is a well-understood procedure. The inverse problem, the matching of the SMEFT to UV scenarios, is more difficult and requires the development of new methods to perform a systematic exploration of models. In this paper we use a diagrammatic technique to construct in an automated way a complete set of possible UV models (given certain, well specified assumptions) that can produce specific groups of SMEFT operators, and illustrate its use by generating models with no tree-level contributions to four-fermion (4F) operators. Those scenarios, which only contribute to 4F at one-loop order, can contain relatively light particles that could be discovered at the LHC in direct searches. For this class of models, we find an interesting interplay between indirect SMEFT and direct searches. We discuss some examples on how this interplay would look like when combining low-energy observables with the SMEFT Higgs-fermion analyses and searches for resonance at the LHC.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S. Weinberg, Baryon and lepton nonconserving processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1566 [INSPIRE].
W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
L. Lehman, Extending the Standard Model effective field theory with the complete set of dimension-7 operators, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 125023 [arXiv:1410.4193] [INSPIRE].
L. Lehman and A. Martin, Low-derivative operators of the Standard Model effective field theory via Hilbert series methods, JHEP 02 (2016) 081 [arXiv:1510.00372] [INSPIRE].
B. Henning, X. Lu, T. Melia and H. Murayama, 2, 84, 30, 993, 560, 15456, 11962, 261485, . . .: higher dimension operators in the SM EFT, JHEP 08 (2017) 016 [Erratum ibid. 09 (2019) 019] [arXiv:1512.03433] [INSPIRE].
B. Gripaios and D. Sutherland, DEFT: a program for operators in EFT, JHEP 01 (2019) 128 [arXiv:1807.07546] [INSPIRE].
J.C. Criado, BasisGen: automatic generation of operator bases, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 256 [arXiv:1901.03501] [INSPIRE].
C.W. Murphy, Dimension-8 operators in the Standard Model effective field theory, JHEP 10 (2020) 174 [arXiv:2005.00059] [INSPIRE].
H.-L. Li, Z. Ren, J. Shu, M.-L. Xiao, J.-H. Yu and Y.-H. Zheng, Complete set of dimension-eight operators in the Standard Model effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 015026 [arXiv:2005.00008] [INSPIRE].
H.-L. Li, Z. Ren, M.-L. Xiao, J.-H. Yu and Y.-H. Zheng, Complete set of dimension-nine operators in the Standard Model effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 015025 [arXiv:2007.07899] [INSPIRE].
Y. Liao and X.-D. Ma, An explicit construction of the dimension-9 operator basis in the standard model effective field theory, JHEP 11 (2020) 152 [arXiv:2007.08125] [INSPIRE].
A. Falkowski and K. Mimouni, Model independent constraints on four-lepton operators, JHEP 02 (2016) 086 [arXiv:1511.07434] [INSPIRE].
A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso and K. Mimouni, Compilation of low-energy constraints on 4-fermion operators in the SMEFT, JHEP 08 (2017) 123 [arXiv:1706.03783] [INSPIRE].
A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso and O. Naviliat-Cuncic, Comprehensive analysis of beta decays within and beyond the Standard Model, JHEP 04 (2021) 126 [arXiv:2010.13797] [INSPIRE].
J. Ellis, M. Madigan, K. Mimasu, V. Sanz and T. You, Top, Higgs, diboson and electroweak fit to the Standard Model effective field theory, JHEP 04 (2021) 279 [arXiv:2012.02779] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, S. Davidson, G.M. Pruna and A. Signer, Renormalisation-group improved analysis of μ → e processes in a systematic effective-field-theory approach, JHEP 05 (2017) 117 [arXiv:1702.03020] [INSPIRE].
J. de Blas, J.C. Criado, M. Pérez-Victoria and J. Santiago, Effective description of general extensions of the Standard Model: the complete tree-level dictionary, JHEP 03 (2018) 109 [arXiv:1711.10391] [INSPIRE].
H.-L. Li, Y.-H. Ni, M.-L. Xiao and J.-H. Yu, The bottom-up EFT: complete UV resonances of the SMEFT operators, arXiv:2204.03660 [INSPIRE].
F. Bonnet, D. Hernandez, T. Ota and W. Winter, Neutrino masses from higher than d = 5 effective operators, JHEP 10 (2009) 076 [arXiv:0907.3143] [INSPIRE].
F. Bonnet, M. Hirsch, T. Ota and W. Winter, Systematic study of the d = 5 Weinberg operator at one-loop order, JHEP 07 (2012) 153 [arXiv:1204.5862] [INSPIRE].
D. Aristizabal Sierra, A. Degee, L. Dorame and M. Hirsch, Systematic classification of two-loop realizations of the Weinberg operator, JHEP 03 (2015) 040 [arXiv:1411.7038] [INSPIRE].
R. Cepedello, R.M. Fonseca and M. Hirsch, Systematic classification of three-loop realizations of the Weinberg operator, JHEP 10 (2018) 197 [Erratum ibid. 06 (2019) 034] [arXiv:1807.00629] [INSPIRE].
S. Das Bakshi, J. Chakrabortty, S. Prakash, S.U. Rahaman and M. Spannowsky, EFT diagrammatica: UV roots of the CP-conserving SMEFT, JHEP 06 (2021) 033 [arXiv:2103.11593] [INSPIRE].
U. Banerjee, J. Chakrabortty, S. Prakash and S.U. Rahaman, Characters and group invariant polynomials of (super)fields: road to “Lagrangian”, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 938 [arXiv:2004.12830] [INSPIRE].
W. Naskar, S. Prakash and S.U. Rahaman, EFT diagrammatica. Part II. Tracing the UV origin of bosonic D6 CPV and D8 SMEFT operators, JHEP 08 (2022) 190 [arXiv:2205.00910] [INSPIRE].
J. Gargalionis and R.R. Volkas, Exploding operators for Majorana neutrino masses and beyond, JHEP 01 (2021) 074 [arXiv:2009.13537] [INSPIRE].
R.M. Fonseca, GroupMath: a Mathematica package for group theory calculations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 267 (2021) 108085 [arXiv:2011.01764] [INSPIRE].
R.M. Fonseca, The Sym2Int program: going from symmetries to interactions, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 873 (2017) 012045 [arXiv:1703.05221] [INSPIRE].
A. Carmona, A. Lazopoulos, P. Olgoso and J. Santiago, Matchmakereft: automated tree-level and one-loop matching, SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 198 [arXiv:2112.10787] [INSPIRE].
R.M. Fonseca and M. Hirsch, Gauge vectors and double beta decay, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 035033 [arXiv:1612.04272] [INSPIRE].
C. Biggio, M. Bordone, L. Di Luzio and G. Ridolfi, Massive vectors and loop observables: the g − 2 case, JHEP 10 (2016) 002 [arXiv:1607.07621] [INSPIRE].
R.M. Fonseca, A triplet gauge boson with hypercharge one, arXiv:2205.12294 [INSPIRE].
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of particle physics, PTEP 2020 (2020) 083C01 [INSPIRE].
T.K. Hemmick et al., A search for anomalously heavy isotopes of low Z nuclei, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 2074 [INSPIRE].
A. Kudo and M. Yamaguchi, Inflation with low reheat temperature and cosmological constraint on stable charged massive particles, Phys. Lett. B 516 (2001) 151 [hep-ph/0103272] [INSPIRE].
M. Taoso, G. Bertone and A. Masiero, Dark matter candidates: a ten-point test, JCAP 03 (2008) 022 [arXiv:0711.4996] [INSPIRE].
C. Arbeláez, R. Cepedello, J.C. Helo, M. Hirsch and S. Kovalenko, How many 1-loop neutrino mass models are there?, JHEP 08 (2022) 023 [arXiv:2205.13063] [INSPIRE].
F. del Aguila, M. Pérez-Victoria and J. Santiago, Observable contributions of new exotic quarks to quark mixing, JHEP 09 (2000) 011 [hep-ph/0007316] [INSPIRE].
F. del Aguila, J. de Blas and M. Pérez-Victoria, Effects of new leptons in electroweak precision data, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 013010 [arXiv:0803.4008] [INSPIRE].
M. Carpentier and S. Davidson, Constraints on two-lepton, two quark operators, Eur. Phys. J. C 70 (2010) 1071 [arXiv:1008.0280] [INSPIRE].
J. de Blas, M. Chala and J. Santiago, Global constraints on lepton-quark contact interactions, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 095011 [arXiv:1307.5068] [INSPIRE].
O. Domenech, A. Pomarol and J. Serra, Probing the SM with dijets at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 074030 [arXiv:1201.6510] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for the HH → \( b\overline{b}b\overline{b} \) process via vector-boson fusion production using proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 07 (2020) 108 [Erratum ibid. 01 (2021) 145] [Erratum ibid. 05 (2021) 207] [arXiv:2001.05178] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Combination of searches for Higgs boson pairs in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 800 (2020) 135103 [arXiv:1906.02025] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Measurements of W+ W− + ≥ 1 jet production cross-sections in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 06 (2021) 003 [arXiv:2103.10319] [INSPIRE].
J. Ellis, C.W. Murphy, V. Sanz and T. You, Updated global SMEFT fit to Higgs, diboson and electroweak data, JHEP 06 (2018) 146 [arXiv:1803.03252] [INSPIRE].
C. Degrande, A basis of dimension-eight operators for anomalous neutral triple gauge boson interactions, JHEP 02 (2014) 101 [arXiv:1308.6323] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2207.13714
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Cepedello, R., Esser, F., Hirsch, M. et al. Mapping the SMEFT to discoverable models. J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 229 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2022)229
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2022)229