Abstract
Using de Wit-Nicolai D = 4 \( \mathcal{N} \) = 8 SO(8) supergravity as an example, we show how modern Machine Learning software libraries such as Google’s TensorFlow can be employed to greatly simplify the analysis of high-dimensional scalar sectors of some M-Theory compactifications. We provide detailed information on the location, symmetries, and particle spectra and charges of 192 critical points on the scalar manifold of SO(8) supergravity, including one newly discovered \( \mathcal{N} \) = 1 vacuum with SO(3) residual symmetry, one new potentially stabilizable non-supersymmetric solution, and examples for “Galois conjugate pairs” of solutions, i.e. solution-pairs that share the same gauge group embedding into SO(8) and minimal polynomials for the cosmological constant. Where feasible, we give analytic expressions for solution coordinates and cosmological constants.
As the authors’ aspiration is to present the discussion in a form that is accessible to both the Machine Learning and String Theory communities and allows adopting our methods towards the study of other models, we provide an introductory overview over the relevant Physics as well as Machine Learning concepts. This includes short pedagogical code examples. In particular, we show how to formulate a requirement for residual Supersymmetry as a Machine Learning loss function and effectively guide the numerical search towards supersymmetric critical points. Numerical investigations suggest that there are no further supersymmetric vacua beyond this newly discovered fifth solution.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S.W. Hawking, Is the end in sight for theoretical physics?, Phys. Bull.32 (1981) 15.
M. Abadi et al., TensorFlow: a system for large-scale machine learning, talk given at the 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 16 ), November 2-4, Savannah, U.S.A. (2016).
B. de Wit and H. Nicolai, N = 8 supergravity with Local SO(8) × SU(8) invariance, Phys. Lett. B108 (1982) 285 [INSPIRE].
B. de Wit and H. Nicolai, Local SO(8) × SU(8) invariance in \( \mathcal{N} \) = 8 supergravity and its implication for superunification, technical report CM-P00062104 (1981).
M. Günaydin, L.J. Romans and N.P. Warner, Gauged N = 8 supergravity in five-dimensions, Phys. Lett.154B (1985) 268 [INSPIRE].
https://colab.sandbox.google.com/github/google-research/google-research/blob/master/ m theory/dim4/so8_supergravity_extrema/colab/so8_supergravity.ipynb
https://github.com/google-research/google-research/tree/master/m_theory
M.J. Duff, The theory formerly known as strings, Sci. Amer.278 (1998) 64 [math/9608117].
E. Witten, String theory dynamics in various dimensions, Nucl. Phys.B 443 (1995) 85 [hep-th/9503124] [INSPIRE].
J. Wess and B. Zumino, Supergauge transformations in four-dimensions, Nucl. Phys.B 70 (1974) 39 [INSPIRE].
D.Z. Freedman, P. van Nieuwenhuizen and S. Ferrara, Progress toward a theory of supergravity, Phys. Rev.D 13 (1976) 3214 [INSPIRE].
S. Deser and B. Zumino, Consistent supergravity, Phys. Lett.B 62 (1976) 335 [INSPIRE].
Z. Bern et al., Ultraviolet behavior of \( \mathcal{N} \)= 8 supergravity at four loops, Phys. Rev. Lett.103 (2009) 81301.
Z. Bern, Ultraviolet surprises in gravity, talk given at Bay Area Particle Theory Seminar (BAPTS), October9, San Francisco, U.S.A (2015).
S. Deser, J.H. Kay and K.S. Stelle, Renormalizability properties of supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.38 (1977) 527 [arXiv:1506.03757] [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, What every physicist should know about string theory, in Foundations of mathematics and physics one century after Hilbert, J. Kouneiher ed., Springer, Germany (2018).
S. Weinberg, The quantum theory of fields. Vol. 3: supersymmetry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2013).
M. Tanabashi et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev.D 98 (2018) 030001.
G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept.405 (2005) 279.
R. D. Peccei, The strong CP problem and axions, in Axions, M. Kuster et al. eds., Springer, Germany (2008).
S.M. Carroll, The cosmological constant, Liv. Rev. Rel.4 (2001) 1.
E. Witten, Geometric Langlands from six dimensions, arXiv:0905.2720 [INSPIRE].
S.L. Adler, Axial-vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics, Phys. Rev.177 (1969) 2426.
A. Bilal, Lectures on anomalies, arXiv:0802.0634 [INSPIRE].
H. Georgi and S.L. Glashow, Unity of all elementary particle forces, Phys. Rev. Lett.32 (1974) 438 [INSPIRE].
J.C. Pati and A. Salam, Lepton number as the fourth “color”, Phys. Rev.10 (1974) 275.
F. Englert, Nobel lecture: the BEH mechanism and its scalar boson, Rev. Mod. Phys.86 (2014) 843.
P.W. Higgs, Nobel lecture: evading the Goldstone theorem, Rev. Mod. Phys.86 (2014) 851.
H. Nicolai and N.P. Warner, The SU(3) × U(1) invariant breaking of gauged N = 8 supergravity, Nucl. Phys.B 259 (1985) 412 [INSPIRE].
K. A. Meissner and H. Nicolai, Standard model fermions and \( \mathcal{N} \)= 8 supergravity, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 65029.
A. Kleinschmidt and H. Nicolai, Standard model fermions and K(E 10), Phys. Lett.B 747 (2015) 251 [arXiv:1504.01586] [INSPIRE].
N. Bobev, N. Halmagyi, K. Pilch and N.P. Warner, Holographic, N = 1 supersymmetric RG flows on M 2 branes, JHEP 09 (2009) 043 [arXiv:0901.2736] [INSPIRE].
T. Kaluza, On the unification problem in physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys.D 27 (2018) 1870001.
O. Klein, Quantentheorie und fünfdimensionale Relativitätstheorie, Z. Phys.37 (1926) 895.
E. Cremmer, B. Julia and J. Scherk, Supergravity theory in eleven-dimensions, Phys. Lett.B 76 (1978) 409 [INSPIRE].
E. Cremmer and B. Julia, The N = 8 supergravity theory. 1. The lagrangian, Phys. Lett.B 80 (1978) 48 [INSPIRE].
E. Cremmer and B. Julia, The SO(8) supergravity, Nucl. Phys.B 159 (1979) 141 [INSPIRE].
G. Parisi and N. Sourlas, Supersymmetric field theories and stochastic differential equations, Nucl. Phys.B 206 (1982) 321.
S. Ferrara, J. Scherk and B. Zumino, Algebraic properties of extended supergravity theories, Nucl. Phys. B121 (1977) 393 [INSPIRE].
E.S. Fradkin and M.A. Vasiliev, Minimal set of auxiliary fields in SO(2) extended supergravity, Phys. Lett.85B (1979) 47 [INSPIRE].
P. Fayet, Fermi-Bose hypersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B113 (1976) 135 [INSPIRE].
J. Scherk, Antigravity: a crazy idea?, Phys. Lett.88B (1979) 265 [INSPIRE].
E. Kopczynski, D. Celinska and M. Čtrnáct, HyperRogue: playing with Hyperbolic Geometry, in the proceedings of the Bridges Conference, July 27-31, Ontario, Canada (2017).
J. Milnor, On manifolds homeomorphic to the 7-sphere, Ann. Math.64 (1956) 399.
E.V. Brieskorn, Examples of singular normal complex spaces which are topological manifolds, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.55 (1966) 1395.
B. de Wit and H. Nicolai, N = 8 supergravity, Nucl. Phys.B 208 (1982) 323 [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, Fermion quantum numbers in Kaluza-Klein theory, in the proceedings of Quantum field theory and the fundamental problems of physics, June 1-3, Shelter Island, U.S.A. (1983).
J. Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys.38 (1999) 1113.
S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett.B 428 (1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109] [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, Anti de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1998) 253.
P. Kovtun, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets, Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics, Phys. Rev. Lett.94 (2005) 111601 [hep-th/0405231] [INSPIRE].
S.S. Gubser, Breaking an Abelian gauge symmetry near a black hole horizon, Phys. Rev.D 78 (2008) 065034.
S.A. Hartnoll, C.P. Herzog and G.T. Horowitz, Holographic superconductors, JHEP12 (2008) 015.
S.A. Hartnoll, C.P. Herzog and G.T. Horowitz, Building a Holographic Superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett.101 (2008) 031601 [arXiv:0803.3295] [INSPIRE].
J. Ehlers, Konstruktionen und Charakterisierung von Losungen der Einsteinschen Gravitationsfeldgleichungen, Ph.D. thesis, Hamburg University, Hamburg, Germany (1957).
R. Geroch, A method for generating solutions of Einstein’s equations, J. Math. Phys.12 (1971) 918.
J. Berkeley and D.S. Berman, The Navier-Stokes equation and solution generating symmetries from holography, JHEP04 (2013) 092 [arXiv:1211.1983] [INSPIRE].
S. Bhattacharyya, S. Minwalla, V. E. Hubeny and M. Rangamani, Nonlinear fluid dynamics from gravity, JHEP02 (2008) 045.
O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D.L. Jafferis and J. Maldacena, \( \mathcal{N} \) = 6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M 2-branes and their gravity duals, JHEP10 (2008) 091.
N. Bobev, V.S. Min and K. Pilch, Mass-deformed ABJM and black holes in AdS 4, JHEP03 (2018) 050 [arXiv:1801.03135] [INSPIRE].
A.M. Turing, Computing machinery and intelligence, Mind49 (1950) 433.
A.L. Samuel, Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers, IBM J. Res. Dev.3 (1959) 210.
C. Olah, A. Mordvintsev and L. Schubert, Feature visualization, Distill2 (2017) e7.
D. Genzel and A. Popat, Paper to digital in 200+ languages, (2015).
A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever and G.E. Hinton, ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, in Advances in neural information processing systems 25 , F. Pereira et al. eds., Curran Associates Inc., U.S.A. (2012).
C. Szegedy et al., Going deeper with convolutions, in the proceedings of the 28thIEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 7-12, Boston, U.S.A. (2014) [arXiv:1409.4842].
P. Sharma, N. Ding, S. Goodman and R. Soricut, Conceptual captions: a cleaned, hypernymed, image alt-text dataset for automatic image captioning, in the proceedings of the 56thAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , July 15-20, Melbourne, Australia (2018).
A. Vaswani et al., Attention is all you need, in Advances in neural information processing systems 30 , I. Guyon et al. eds., Curran Associates Inc., U.S.A. (2017).
D. Silver et al., Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search, Nature529 (2016) 484.
O. Vinyals et al., AlphaStar: mastering the real-time strategy game StarCraft II, https://deepmind.com/blog/alphastar-mastering-real-time-strategy-game-starcraft-ii (2019).
T. Karras, S. Laine and T. Aila, A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks, arXiv:1812.04948.
F. Rosenblatt, The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain, Psychol. Rev.65 (1958) 386.
D.E. Rumelhart et al., A general framework for parallel distributed processing, in Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, D.E. Rumelhart and J.L. McClelland eds., MIT Press, U.S.A. (1986).
S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, Long short-term memory, Neural Comput.9 (1997) 1735.
Y. Lecun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio and P. Haffner, Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition, Proc. IEEE86 (1998) 2278.
E.J. Hartman, J.D. Keeler and J.M. Kowalski, Layered neural networks with gaussian hidden units as universal approximations, Neural Comput.2 (1990) 210.
G.E. Hinton, S. Osindero and Y.-W. Teh, A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets, Neural Comput.18 (2006) 1527 [arXiv:1111.6189].
C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, Support-vector networks, Machine Learn.20 (1995) 273.
X. Glorot, A. Bordes and Y. Bengio, Deep sparse rectifier neural networks, in the proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , April 11-13, Ft. Lauderdale, U.S.A. (2011).
T. Kohonen, Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps, Biol. Cybernet.43 (1982) 59.
P. Covington, J. Adams and E. Sargin, Deep neural networks for YouTube recommendations, in the proceedings of the 10thACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys’16), September 15-19, Boston, U.S.A. (2016).
V. Mnih et al., Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning, Nature518 (2015) 529.
R. Dunne and N. Campbell, On the pairing of the Softmax activation and cross-entropy penalty functions and the derivation of the Softmax activation function, in the proceedings of the 8thAustralian Conference on Neural Networks (ACNN97), Australia (1997).
B. Speelpenning, Compiling fast partial derivatives of functions given by algorithms, Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, U.S.A. (1980).
D.E. Rumelhart, G.E. Hinton and R.J. Williams, Learning internal representations by error propagation, technical report, US Dept of the Navy, Cambridge, U.S.A. (1985).
R. Bellman, Dynamic programming and a new formalism in the calculus of variations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.40 (1954) 231.
R6RS-AD, https://github.com/qobi/R6RS-AD.
R. Kondor et al., Covariant compositional networks for learning graphs, [arXiv:1801.02144].
I. Bars, Supersymmetry, p-brane duality and hidden space-time dimensions, Phys. Rev.D 54 (1996) 5203 [hep-th/9604139] [INSPIRE].
E. Bergshoeff, E. Sezgin and P.K. Townsend, Supermembranes and Eleven-Dimensional Supergravity, Phys. Lett.B 189 (1987) 75 [INSPIRE].
E. Cremmer, B. Julia and J. Scherk, Supergravity theory in 11 dimensions, in Supergravities in Diverse Dimensions, A. Salam and E. Sezgin eds., World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore (1989).
M.J. Duff, B.E.W. Nilsson and C.N. Pope, Kaluza-Klein Supergravity, Phys. Rept.130 (1986) 1 [INSPIRE].
P.G.O. Freund and M.A. Rubin, Dynamics of dimensional reduction, Phys. Lett.B 97 (1980) 233 [INSPIRE].
E. Cremmer, B. Julia, H. Lü and C.N. Pope, Dualization of dualities. 1., Nucl. Phys.B 523 (1998) 73 [hep-th/9710119] [INSPIRE].
E. Cremmer, B. Julia, H. Lü and C.N. Pope, Dualization of dualities. 2. Twisted self-duality of doubled fields and superdualities, Nucl. Phys.B 535 (1998) 242 [hep-th/9806106] [INSPIRE].
M.J. Duff, Ultraviolet divergences in extended supergravity, talk given at the First School on Supergravity, April 22-May 6, Trieste, Italy (1981), arXiv:1201.0386 [INSPIRE].
B. Biran, F. Englert, B. de Wit and H. Nicolai, Gauged N = 8 supergravity and its breaking from spontaneous compactification, Phys. Lett.B 124 (1983) 45.
M.J. Duff and C.N. Pope, Kaluza-Klein supergravity and the seven sphere, in the proceedings of the September School on Supergravity and Supersymmetry, September 6-18, Trieste, Italy (1982).
B. de Wit and H. Nicolai, The consistency of the S 7truncation in D = 11 supergravity, Nucl. Phys.B 281 (1987) 211 [INSPIRE].
H. Nicolai and K. Pilch, Consistent truncation of d = 11 supergravity on AdS 4 × S 7, JHEP03 (2012) 099 [arXiv:1112.6131] [INSPIRE].
M.J. Duff, B.E.W. Nilsson and C.N. Pope, Compactification of d = 11 Supergravity on K(3) × U(3), Phys. Lett. B129 (1983) 39 [INSPIRE].
B. de Wit, H. Samtleben and M. Trigiante, The maximal \( \mathcal{D} \)= 4 supergravities, JHEP 06 (2007) 049.
C.M. Hull and N.P. Warner, The structure of the gauged N = 8 supergravity theories, Nucl. Phys.B 253 (1985) 650 [INSPIRE].
C.M. Hull, Non-compact gaugings of \( \mathcal{N} \) = 8 supergravity, in Supergravities in Diverse Dimensions, A. Salam and E. Sezgin eds., World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore (1989).
G. Dall’Agata, G. Inverso and M. Trigiante, Evidence for a family of SO(8) gauged supergravity theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 201301 [arXiv:1209.0760] [INSPIRE].
B. de Wit, H. Samtleben and M. Trigiante, On Lagrangians and gaugings of maximal supergravities, Nucl. Phys.B 655 (2003) 93 [hep-th/0212239] [INSPIRE].
B. de Wit, Supergravity, in the proceedings of Unity from duality. Gravity, gauge theory and strings. NATO Advanced Study Institute, Euro Summer School, 76thsession, July 30-August 31, Les Houches, France (2001), hep-th/0212245 [INSPIRE].
T. Fischbacher, Fourteen new stationary points in the scalar potential of SO(8)-gauged N = 8, D = 4 supergravity, JHEP09 (2010) 068 [arXiv:0912.1636] [INSPIRE].
G. Y. Rainich, Electrodynamics in the general relativity theory, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.10 (1924) 124.
N.P. Warner, Some properties of the scalar potential in gauged supergravity theories, Nucl. Phys.B 231 (1984) 250 [INSPIRE].
P. Breitenlohner and D.Z. Freedman, Stability in gauged extended supergravity, Annals Phys.144 (1982) 249 [INSPIRE].
T. Fischbacher, K. Pilch and N.P. Warner, New supersymmetric and stable, non-supersymmetric phases in supergravity and holographic field theory, arXiv:1010.4910 [INSPIRE].
H. Godazga, An SO(3) × SO(3) invariant solution of D = 11 supergravity, JHEP01 (2015) 056 [arXiv:1410.5090] [INSPIRE].
A. Borghese, R. Linares and D. Roest, Minimal Stability in Maximal Supergravity, JHEP07 (2012) 034 [arXiv:1112.3939] [INSPIRE].
T. Fischbacher, The many vacua of gauged extended supergravities, Gen. Rel. Grav.41 (2009) 315 [arXiv:0811.1915] [INSPIRE].
N.P. Warner, Some new extrema of the scalar potential of gauged N = 8 supergravity, Phys. Lett.128B (1983) 169 [INSPIRE].
B. de Wit and H. Nicolai, A new SO(7) invariant solution of d = 11 supergravity, Phys. Lett.148B (1984) 60 [INSPIRE].
N. Bobev, N. Halmagyi, K. Pilch and N.P. Warner, Supergravity instabilities of non-supersymmetric quantum critical points, Class. Quant. Grav.27 (2010) 235013.
B. de Wit and H. Nicolai, The parallelizing S 7torsion in gauged N = 8 supergravity, Nucl. Phys.B 231 (1984) 506 [INSPIRE].
Google colaboratory, https://colab.sandbox.google.com.
N.P. Jouppi et al., In-datacenter performance analysis of a tensor processing unit, in the proceedings of the 44thAnnual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA’17), June 24-28, Toronto, Canada (2017), arXiv:1704.04760.
J. Nocedal and S. Wright, Numerical optimization, 2nd edition, Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering, Springer, Germany (2006).
M. Morse, The calculus of variations in the large, Monat. Math. Phys.47 (1939) A10.
N. Bobev, T. Fischbacher and K. Pilch, A new \( \mathcal{N} \) = 1 AdS 4vacuum of maximal supergravity, work in progress.
T. Fischbacher, The encyclopedic reference of critical points for SO(8)-gauged N = 8 supergravity. Part 1: cosmological constants in the range −Λ/g 2 ∈ [6 : 14.7), arXiv:1109.1424 [INSPIRE].
S. Dittmaier, Precision standard model physics, talv given at LoopFest V, June 19-21, SLAC, Stanford, U.S.A. (2006).
G.P. Collins, The Large Hadron Collider: the discovery machine, Sci. Amer. (2008) 39.
F. Johansson et al., mpmath: a Python library for arbitrary-precision floating-point arithmetic (version 0.18) (2013).
D. Maclaurin, Modeling, inference and optimization with composable differentiable procedures, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, U.S.A. (2016).
P.B. Davenport, Rotations about nonorthogonal axes, AIAA J.11 (1973) 853.
J. Wittenburg and L. Lilov, Decomposition of a finite rotation into three rotations about given axes, Mult. Syst. Dyn.9 (2003) 353.
D.H. Bailey and J.M. Borwein, PSLQ: an algorithm to discover integer relations, (2009).
B. de Wit and H. Nicolai, Properties of \( \mathcal{N} \) = 8 supergravity, in the proceedings of the 19thWinter School and Workshop on Theoretical Physics: Supersymmetry and Supergravity, February 14-26, Karpacz, Poland (1983).
A. Borghese, A. Guarino and D. Roest, Triality, periodicity and stability of SO(8) gauged supergravity, JHEP05 (2013) 107 [arXiv:1302.6057] [INSPIRE].
M.B. Green, J.H. Schwarz and E. Witten, Superstring theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics volume 150, Camrbidge University PRess, Cambridge U.K. (2012).
J.C. Baez, The octonions, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.39 (2001) 145 [math/0105155].
T. Fischbacher, Numerical tools to validate stationary points of SO(8)-gauged N = 8 D = 4 supergravity, Comput. Phys. Commun.183 (2012) 780 [arXiv:1007.0600] [INSPIRE].
F. Englert, Spontaneous compactification of eleven-dimensional supergravity, Phys. Lett.B 119 (1982) 339 [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1906.00207
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Comsa, I.M., Firsching, M. & Fischbacher, T. SO(8) supergravity and the magic of machine learning. J. High Energ. Phys. 2019, 57 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2019)057
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2019)057