Abstract
String theory axions are interesting candidates for fields whose potential might be controllable over super-Planckian field ranges and therefore as possible candidates for inflatons in large field inflation. Axion monodromy scenarios are setups where the axion shift symmetry is broken by some effect such that the axion can traverse a large number of periods potentially leading to super-Planckian excursions. We study such scenarios in type IIA string theory where the axion shift symmetry is broken by background fluxes. In particular we calculate the backreaction of the energy density induced by the axion vacuum expectation value on its own field space metric. We find universal behaviour for all the compactifications studied where up to a certain critical axion value there is only a small backreaction effect. Beyond the critical value the backreaction is strong and implies that the proper field distance as measured by the backreacted metric increases at best logarithmically with the axion vev, thereby placing strong limitations on extending the field distance any further. The critical axion value can be made arbitrarily large by the choice of fluxes. However the backreaction of these fluxes on the axion field space metric ensures a precise cancellation such that the proper field distance up to the critical axion value is flux independent and remains sub-Planckian. We also study an axion alignment scenario for type IIA compactifications on a twisted torus with four fundamental axions mixing to leave an axion with an effective decay constant which is flux dependent. There is a choice of fluxes for which the alignment parameter controlling the effective decay constant is unconstrained by tadpoles and can in principle lead to an arbitrarily large effective decay constant. However we show that these fluxes backreact on the fundamental decay constants so as to precisely cancel any enhancement leaving a sub-Planckian effective decay constant.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
BICEP2, Planck collaboration, P.A.R. Ade et al., Joint Analysis of BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 101301 [arXiv:1502.00612] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis and C. Vafa, The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force, JHEP 06 (2007) 060 [hep-th/0601001] [INSPIRE].
T. Rudelius, Constraints on Axion Inflation from the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JCAP 09 (2015) 020 [arXiv:1503.00795] [INSPIRE].
M. Montero, A.M. Uranga and I. Valenzuela, Transplanckian axions!?, JHEP 08 (2015) 032 [arXiv:1503.03886] [INSPIRE].
J. Brown, W. Cottrell, G. Shiu and P. Soler, Fencing in the Swampland: Quantum Gravity Constraints on Large Field Inflation, JHEP 10 (2015) 023 [arXiv:1503.04783] [INSPIRE].
T.C. Bachlechner, C. Long and L. McAllister, Planckian Axions and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 01 (2016) 091 [arXiv:1503.07853] [INSPIRE].
J. Brown, W. Cottrell, G. Shiu and P. Soler, On Axionic Field Ranges, Loopholes and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 04 (2016) 017 [arXiv:1504.00659] [INSPIRE].
B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, Weak Gravity Strongly Constrains Large-Field Axion Inflation, JHEP 12 (2015) 108 [arXiv:1506.03447] [INSPIRE].
B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, Sharpening the Weak Gravity Conjecture with Dimensional Reduction, JHEP 02 (2016) 140 [arXiv:1509.06374] [INSPIRE].
L.E. Ibáñez, M. Montero, A. Uranga and I. Valenzuela, Relaxion Monodromy and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 04 (2016) 020 [arXiv:1512.00025] [INSPIRE].
A. Hebecker, F. Rompineve and A. Westphal, Axion Monodromy and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 04 (2016) 157 [arXiv:1512.03768] [INSPIRE].
J.P. Conlon, Quantum Gravity Constraints on Inflation, JCAP 09 (2012) 019 [arXiv:1203.5476] [INSPIRE].
N. Kaloper, M. Kleban, A. Lawrence and M.S. Sloth, Large Field Inflation and Gravitational Entropy, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 043510 [arXiv:1511.05119] [INSPIRE].
D. Baumann and L. McAllister, Inflation and String Theory, arXiv:1404.2601 [INSPIRE].
M. Cicoli, C.P. Burgess and F. Quevedo, Fibre Inflation: Observable Gravity Waves from IIB String Compactifications, JCAP 03 (2009) 013 [arXiv:0808.0691] [INSPIRE].
B.J. Broy, D. Ciupke, F.G. Pedro and A. Westphal, Starobinsky-Type Inflation from α ′ -Corrections, JCAP 01 (2016) 001 [arXiv:1509.00024] [INSPIRE].
T. Banks, M. Dine, P.J. Fox and E. Gorbatov, On the possibility of large axion decay constants, JCAP 06 (2003) 001 [hep-th/0303252] [INSPIRE].
J.P. Conlon and S. Krippendorf, Axion decay constants away from the lamppost, JHEP 04 (2016) 085 [arXiv:1601.00647] [INSPIRE].
Z. Kenton and S. Thomas, D-brane Potentials in the Warped Resolved Conifold and Natural Inflation, JHEP 02 (2015) 127 [arXiv:1409.1221] [INSPIRE].
K. Kooner, S. Parameswaran and I. Zavala, Warping the Weak Gravity Conjecture, Phys. Lett. B 759 (2016) 402 [arXiv:1509.07049] [INSPIRE].
J.E. Kim, H.P. Nilles and M. Peloso, Completing natural inflation, JCAP 01 (2005) 005 [hep-ph/0409138] [INSPIRE].
C. Long, L. McAllister and P. McGuirk, Aligned Natural Inflation in String Theory, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 023501 [arXiv:1404.7852] [INSPIRE].
I. Ben-Dayan, F.G. Pedro and A. Westphal, Towards Natural Inflation in String Theory, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 023515 [arXiv:1407.2562] [INSPIRE].
A. Hebecker, P. Mangat, F. Rompineve and L.T. Witkowski, Winding out of the Swamp: Evading the Weak Gravity Conjecture with F-term Winding Inflation?, Phys. Lett. B 748 (2015) 455 [arXiv:1503.07912] [INSPIRE].
F. Ruehle and C. Wieck, Natural inflation and moduli stabilization in heterotic orbifolds, JHEP 05 (2015) 112 [arXiv:1503.07183] [INSPIRE].
X. Gao, T. Li and P. Shukla, Combining Universal and Odd RR Axions for Aligned Natural Inflation, JCAP 10 (2014) 048 [arXiv:1406.0341] [INSPIRE].
E. Palti, On Natural Inflation and Moduli Stabilisation in String Theory, JHEP 10 (2015) 188 [arXiv:1508.00009] [INSPIRE].
R. Kappl, H.P. Nilles and M.W. Winkler, Modulated Natural Inflation, Phys. Lett. B 753 (2016) 653 [arXiv:1511.05560] [INSPIRE].
E. Silverstein and A. Westphal, Monodromy in the CMB: Gravity Waves and String Inflation, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 106003 [arXiv:0803.3085] [INSPIRE].
L. McAllister, E. Silverstein and A. Westphal, Gravity Waves and Linear Inflation from Axion Monodromy, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 046003 [arXiv:0808.0706] [INSPIRE].
E. Palti and T. Weigand, Towards large r from [p, q]-inflation, JHEP 04 (2014) 155 [arXiv:1403.7507] [INSPIRE].
F. Marchesano, G. Shiu and A.M. Uranga, F-term Axion Monodromy Inflation, JHEP 09 (2014) 184 [arXiv:1404.3040] [INSPIRE].
R. Blumenhagen and E. Plauschinn, Towards Universal Axion Inflation and Reheating in String Theory, Phys. Lett. B 736 (2014) 482 [arXiv:1404.3542] [INSPIRE].
A. Hebecker, S.C. Kraus and L.T. Witkowski, D7-Brane Chaotic Inflation, Phys. Lett. B 737 (2014) 16 [arXiv:1404.3711] [INSPIRE].
M. Arends et al., D7-Brane Moduli Space in Axion Monodromy and Fluxbrane Inflation, Fortsch. Phys. 62 (2014) 647 [arXiv:1405.0283] [INSPIRE].
L.E. Ibáñez and I. Valenzuela, The inflaton as an MSSM Higgs and open string modulus monodromy inflation, Phys. Lett. B 736 (2014) 226 [arXiv:1404.5235] [INSPIRE].
R. Blumenhagen, A. Font, M. Fuchs, D. Herschmann and E. Plauschinn, Towards Axionic Starobinsky-like Inflation in String Theory, Phys. Lett. B 746 (2015) 217 [arXiv:1503.01607] [INSPIRE].
R. Blumenhagen et al., A Flux-Scaling Scenario for High-Scale Moduli Stabilization in String Theory, Nucl. Phys. B 897 (2015) 500 [arXiv:1503.07634] [INSPIRE].
R. Blumenhagen, D. Herschmann and E. Plauschinn, The Challenge of Realizing F-term Axion Monodromy Inflation in String Theory, JHEP 01 (2015) 007 [arXiv:1409.7075] [INSPIRE].
H. Hayashi, R. Matsuda and T. Watari, Issues in Complex Structure Moduli Inflation, arXiv:1410.7522 [INSPIRE].
A. Hebecker, P. Mangat, F. Rompineve and L.T. Witkowski, Tuning and Backreaction in F-term Axion Monodromy Inflation, Nucl. Phys. B 894 (2015) 456 [arXiv:1411.2032] [INSPIRE].
W. Buchmüller, E. Dudas, L. Heurtier, A. Westphal, C. Wieck and M.W. Winkler, Challenges for Large-Field Inflation and Moduli Stabilization, JHEP 04 (2015) 058 [arXiv:1501.05812] [INSPIRE].
R. Blumenhagen, C. Damian, A. Font, D. Herschmann and R. Sun, The Flux-Scaling Scenario: de Sitter Uplift and Axion Inflation, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 536 [arXiv:1510.01522] [INSPIRE].
D. Andriot, A no-go theorem for monodromy inflation, JCAP 03 (2016) 025 [arXiv:1510.02005] [INSPIRE].
D. Escobar, A. Landete, F. Marchesano and D. Regalado, Large field inflation from D-branes, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 081301(R) [arXiv:1505.07871] [INSPIRE].
A. Hebecker, J. Moritz, A. Westphal and L.T. Witkowski, Axion Monodromy Inflation with Warped KK-Modes, Phys. Lett. B 754 (2016) 328 [arXiv:1512.04463] [INSPIRE].
J.P. Conlon, Brane-Antibrane Backreaction in Axion Monodromy Inflation, JCAP 01 (2012) 033 [arXiv:1110.6454] [INSPIRE].
T.W. Grimm and J. Louis, The Effective action of type IIA Calabi-Yau orientifolds, Nucl. Phys. B 718 (2005) 153 [hep-th/0412277] [INSPIRE].
O. DeWolfe, A. Giryavets, S. Kachru and W. Taylor, Type IIA moduli stabilization, JHEP 07 (2005) 066 [hep-th/0505160] [INSPIRE].
G. Villadoro and F. Zwirner, \( \mathcal{N} \) = 1 effective potential from dual type- IIA D6/O6 orientifolds with general fluxes, JHEP 06 (2005) 047 [hep-th/0503169] [INSPIRE].
P.G. Camara, A. Font and L.E. Ibáñez, Fluxes, moduli fixing and MSSM-like vacua in a simple IIA orientifold, JHEP 09 (2005) 013 [hep-th/0506066] [INSPIRE].
T. House and E. Palti, Effective action of (massive) IIA on manifolds with SU(3) structure, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 026004 [hep-th/0505177] [INSPIRE].
C. Caviezel, P. Koerber, S. Körs, D. Lüst, D. Tsimpis and M. Zagermann, The Effective theory of type IIA AdS 4 compactifications on nilmanifolds and cosets, Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 025014 [arXiv:0806.3458] [INSPIRE].
M. Graña, Flux compactifications in string theory: A Comprehensive review, Phys. Rept. 423 (2006) 91 [hep-th/0509003] [INSPIRE].
X. Dong, B. Horn, E. Silverstein and A. Westphal, Simple exercises to flatten your potential, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 026011 [arXiv:1011.4521] [INSPIRE].
S. Bielleman, L.E. Ibáñez, F.G. Pedro and I. Valenzuela, Multifield Dynamics in Higgs-otic Inflation, JHEP 01 (2016) 128 [arXiv:1505.00221] [INSPIRE].
L.E. Ibáñez, F. Marchesano and I. Valenzuela, Higgs-otic Inflation and String Theory, JHEP 01 (2015) 128 [arXiv:1411.5380] [INSPIRE].
E. Dudas and C. Wieck, Moduli backreaction and supersymmetry breaking in string-inspired inflation models, JHEP 10 (2015) 062 [arXiv:1506.01253] [INSPIRE].
E. Dudas and C. Wieck, Inflation, the scale of supersymmetry breaking and moduli stabilization, PoS(PLANCK 2015)038 [arXiv:1511.03413] [INSPIRE].
P. Candelas, X. De La Ossa, A. Font, S.H. Katz and D.R. Morrison, Mirror symmetry for two parameter models. 1., Nucl. Phys. B 416 (1994) 481 [hep-th/9308083] [INSPIRE].
P. Candelas, A. Font, S.H. Katz and D.R. Morrison, Mirror symmetry for two parameter models. 2., Nucl. Phys. B 429 (1994) 626 [hep-th/9403187] [INSPIRE].
E. Palti, G. Tasinato and J. Ward, WEAKLY-coupled IIA Flux Compactifications, JHEP 06 (2008) 084 [arXiv:0804.1248] [INSPIRE].
L. McAllister, E. Silverstein, A. Westphal and T. Wrase, The Powers of Monodromy, JHEP 09 (2014) 123 [arXiv:1405.3652] [INSPIRE].
H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland, Nucl. Phys. B 766 (2007) 21 [hep-th/0605264] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1602.06517
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Baume, F., Palti, E. Backreacted axion field ranges in string theory. J. High Energ. Phys. 2016, 43 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2016)043
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2016)043