Abstract
From generalized gravity mediation we build a SUGRA scenario in which the gluino is much heavier than the electroweak gauginos at the GUT scale. We find that such a non-universal gaugino scenario with very heavy gluino at the GUT scale can be naturally obtained with proper high dimensional operators in the framework of SU(5) GUT. Then, due to the effects of heavy gluino, at the weak scale all colored sparticles are heavy while the uncolored sparticles are light, which can explain the Brookhaven muon g − 2 measurement while satisfying the collider constraints (both the 125 GeV Higgs mass and the direct search limits of sparticles) and dark matter requirements. We also find that, in order to explain the muon g − 2 measurement, the neutralino dark matter is lighter than 200 GeV in our scenario, which can be mostly covered by the future Xenon1T experiment.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
ATLAS collaboration, Combined search for the Standard Model Higgs boson using up to 4.9 fb −1 of pp collision data at \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 49 [arXiv:1202.1408] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Combined results of searches for the standard model Higgs boson in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 26 [arXiv:1202.1488] [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, G.W. Bennett et al., Final Report of the Muon E821 Anomalous Magnetic Moment Measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 072003 [hep-ex/0602035] [INSPIRE].
B.L. Roberts, Status of the Fermilab Muon (g-2) Experiment, Chin. Phys. C 34 (2010) 741 [arXiv:1001.2898].
K. Hagiwara, A.D. Martin, D. Nomura and T. Teubner, Improved predictions for g-2 of the muon and α QED(M 2 Z ), Phys. Lett. B 649 (2007) 173 [hep-ph/0611102] [INSPIRE].
T. Teubner, K. Hagiwara, R. Liao, A. Martin and D. Nomura, Update of g-2 of the muon and Delta alpha, Chin. Phys. C 34 (2010) 728 [arXiv:1001.5401].
M. Davier et al., The Discrepancy Between tau and e + e − Spectral Functions Revisited and the Consequences for the Muon Magnetic Anomaly, Eur. Phys. J. C 66 (2010) 127 [arXiv:0906.5443] [INSPIRE].
M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu, C.Z. Yuan and Z. Zhang, Reevaluation of the hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic anomaly using new e + e − → π + π − cross section data from BABAR, Eur. Phys. J. C 66 (2010) 1 [arXiv:0908.4300] [INSPIRE].
H. Georgi and S.L. Glashow, Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32 (1974) 438 [INSPIRE].
J.R. Ellis, S. Kelley and D.V. Nanopoulos, Precision LEP data, supersymmetric GUTs and string unification, Phys. Lett. B 249 (1990) 441 [INSPIRE].
U. Amaldi, W. de Boer and H. Furstenau, Comparison of grand unified theories with electroweak and strong coupling constants measured at LEP, Phys. Lett. B 260 (1991) 447 [INSPIRE].
P. Langacker and M.-x. Luo, Implications of precision electroweak experiments for M t , ρ 0 , sin2 θ W and grand unification, Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 817 [INSPIRE].
M.B. Einhorn and D.R.T. Jones, The Weak Mixing Angle and Unification Mass in Supersymmetric SU(5), Nucl. Phys. B 196 (1982) 475 [INSPIRE].
W.J. Marciano and G. Senjanović, Predictions of Supersymmetric Grand Unified Theories, Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 3092 [INSPIRE].
J.-J. Cao, Z.-X. Heng, J.M. Yang, Y.-M. Zhang and J.-Y. Zhu, A SM-like Higgs near 125 GeV in low energy SUSY: a comparative study for MSSM and NMSSM, JHEP 03 (2012) 086 [arXiv:1202.5821] [INSPIRE].
J. Cao, Z. Heng, J.M. Yang and J. Zhu, Status of low energy SUSY models confronted with the LHC 125 GeV Higgs data, JHEP 10 (2012) 079 [arXiv:1207.3698] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for squarks and gluinos using final states with jets and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector in \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV proton-proton collisions, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 67 [arXiv:1109.6572] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for squarks and gluinos with the ATLAS detector in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum using 4.7 fb −1 of \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV proton-proton collision data, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 012008 [arXiv:1208.0949] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for Supersymmetry at the LHC in Events with Jets and Missing Transverse Energy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 221804 [arXiv:1109.2352] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in hadronic final states using MT2 in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV, JHEP 10 (2012) 018 [arXiv:1207.1798] [INSPIRE].
C. Han, K.-i. Hikasa, L. Wu, J.M. Yang and Y. Zhang, Current experimental bounds on stop mass in natural SUSY, JHEP 10 (2013) 216 [arXiv:1308.5307] [INSPIRE].
J. Chakrabortty, A. Choudhury and S. Mondal, Non-universal Gaugino mass models under the lamppost of muon (g − 2), arXiv:1503.08703 [INSPIRE].
K. Kowalska, L. Roszkowski, E.M. Sessolo and A.J. Williams, GUT-inspired SUSY and the muon g − 2 anomaly: prospects for LHC 14 TeV, JHEP 06 (2015) 020 [arXiv:1503.08219] [INSPIRE].
K. Harigaya, T.T. Yanagida and N. Yokozaki, Higgs boson mass of 125 GeV and g − 2 of the muon in a gaugino mediation model, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 075010 [arXiv:1501.07447] [INSPIRE].
M. Adeel Ajaib, I. Gogoladze and Q. Shafi, GUT-inspired supersymmetric model for h → γγ and the muon g − 2, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 095005 [arXiv:1501.04125] [INSPIRE].
F.F. Deppisch, N. Desai and T.E. Gonzalo, Compressed and Split Spectra in Minimal SUSY SO(10), Front. Phys. 2 (2014) 00027 [arXiv:1403.2312] [INSPIRE].
T. Cheng, J. Li, T. Li, D.V. Nanopoulos and C. Tong, Electroweak Supersymmetry around the Electroweak Scale, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2322 [arXiv:1202.6088] [INSPIRE].
T. Li and S. Raza, Electroweak supersymmetry from the generalized minimal supergravity model in the MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 055016 [arXiv:1409.3930] [INSPIRE].
S. Akula and P. Nath, Gluino-driven radiative breaking, Higgs boson mass, muon g − 2 and the Higgs diphoton decay in supergravity unification, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 115022 [arXiv:1304.5526] [INSPIRE].
N. Chamoun, C.-S. Huang, C. Liu and X.-H. Wu, Nonuniversal gaugino masses in supersymmetric SO(10), Nucl. Phys. B 624 (2002) 81 [hep-ph/0110332] [INSPIRE].
K. Huitu, J. Laamanen, P.N. Pandita and S. Roy, Phenomenology of non-universal gaugino masses in supersymmetric grand unified theories, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 055013 [hep-ph/0502100] [INSPIRE].
K. Huitu et al., Search for Higgs Bosons in SUSY Cascades in CMS and Dark Matter with Non-universal Gaugino Masses, Eur. Phys. J. C 58 (2008) 591 [arXiv:0808.3094] [INSPIRE].
J. Chakrabortty and A. Raychaudhuri, A Note on dimension-5 operators in GUTs and their impact, Phys. Lett. B 673 (2009) 57 [arXiv:0812.2783] [INSPIRE].
S.P. Martin, Non-universal gaugino masses from non-singlet F-terms in non-minimal unified models, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 095019 [arXiv:0903.3568] [INSPIRE].
D. Horton and G.G. Ross, Naturalness and Focus Points with Non-Universal Gaugino Masses, Nucl. Phys. B 830 (2010) 221 [arXiv:0908.0857] [INSPIRE].
F.F. Deppisch, N. Desai and T.E. Gonzalo, Compressed and Split Spectra in Minimal SUSY SO(10), Front. Phys. 2 (2014) 00027 [arXiv:1403.2312].
C. Balázs, T. Li, D.V. Nanopoulos and F. Wang, Supersymmetry Breaking Scalar Masses and Trilinear Soft Terms in Generalized Minimal Supergravity, JHEP 09 (2010) 003 [arXiv:1006.5559] [INSPIRE].
T. Li and D.V. Nanopoulos, Generalizing Minimal Supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 692 (2010) 121 [arXiv:1002.4183] [INSPIRE].
C. Balázs, T. Li, D.V. Nanopoulos and F. Wang, Realistic Standard Model Fermion Mass Relations in Generalized Minimal Supergravity (GmSUGRA), JHEP 02 (2011) 096 [arXiv:1101.5423] [INSPIRE].
F. Wang, Supersymmetry Breaking Scalar Masses and Trilinear Soft Terms From High-Dimensional Operators in E 6 SUSY GUT, Nucl. Phys. B 851 (2011) 104 [arXiv:1103.0069] [INSPIRE].
A.H. Chamseddine, R.L. Arnowitt and P. Nath, Locally Supersymmetric Grand Unification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 970 [INSPIRE].
H.P. Nilles, Dynamically Broken Supergravity and the Hierarchy Problem, Phys. Lett. B 115 (1982) 193 [INSPIRE].
L.E. Ibáñez, Locally Supersymmetric SU(5) Grand Unification, Phys. Lett. B 118 (1982) 73 [INSPIRE].
R. Barbieri, S. Ferrara and C.A. Savoy, Gauge Models with Spontaneously Broken Local Supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 119 (1982) 343 [INSPIRE].
H.P. Nilles, M. Srednicki and D. Wyler, Weak Interaction Breakdown Induced by Supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 346 [INSPIRE].
J.R. Ellis, D.V. Nanopoulos and K. Tamvakis, Grand Unification in Simple Supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 121 (1983) 123 [INSPIRE].
J.R. Ellis, J.S. Hagelin, D.V. Nanopoulos and K. Tamvakis, Weak Symmetry Breaking by Radiative Corrections in Broken Supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 125 (1983) 275 [INSPIRE].
N. Ohta, Grand unified theories based on local supersymmetry, Prog. Theor. Phys. 70 (1983) 542 [INSPIRE].
L.J. Hall, J.D. Lykken and S. Weinberg, Supergravity as the Messenger of Supersymmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 2359 [INSPIRE].
M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki, Supersymmetric Technicolor, Nucl. Phys. B 189 (1981) 575 [INSPIRE].
S. Dimopoulos and S. Raby, Supercolor, Nucl. Phys. B 192 (1981) 353 [INSPIRE].
M. Dine and W. Fischler, A Phenomenological Model of Particle Physics Based on Supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 110 (1982) 227 [INSPIRE].
M. Dine and A.E. Nelson, Dynamical supersymmetry breaking at low-energies, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 1277 [hep-ph/9303230] [INSPIRE].
M. Dine, A.E. Nelson and Y. Shirman, Low-energy dynamical supersymmetry breaking simplified, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 1362 [hep-ph/9408384] [INSPIRE].
M. Dine, A.E. Nelson, Y. Nir and Y. Shirman, New tools for low-energy dynamical supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 2658 [hep-ph/9507378] [INSPIRE].
G.F. Giudice and R. Rattazzi, Theories with gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rept. 322 (1999) 419 [hep-ph/9801271] [INSPIRE].
L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Out of this world supersymmetry breaking, Nucl. Phys. B 557 (1999) 79 [hep-th/9810155] [INSPIRE].
G.F. Giudice, M.A. Luty, H. Murayama and R. Rattazzi, Gaugino mass without singlets, JHEP 12 (1998) 027 [hep-ph/9810442] [INSPIRE].
S. Akula, B. Altunkaynak, D. Feldman, P. Nath and G. Peim, Higgs Boson Mass Predictions in SUGRA Unification, Recent LHC-7 Results and Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075001 [arXiv:1112.3645] [INSPIRE].
S. Akula, P. Nath and G. Peim, Implications of the Higgs Boson Discovery for mSUGRA, Phys. Lett. B 717 (2012) 188 [arXiv:1207.1839] [INSPIRE].
J.R. Ellis, K. Enqvist, D.V. Nanopoulos and K. Tamvakis, Gaugino Masses and Grand Unification, Phys. Lett. B 155 (1985) 381 [INSPIRE].
M. Drees, Phenomenological Consequences of N = 1 Supergravity Theories With Nonminimal Kinetic Energy Terms for Vector Superfields, Phys. Lett. B 158 (1985) 409 [INSPIRE].
A. Djouadi, J.-L. Kneur and G. Moultaka, SuSpect: A Fortran code for the supersymmetric and Higgs particle spectrum in the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176 (2007) 426 [hep-ph/0211331] [INSPIRE].
P. Gondolo et al., DarkSUSY: Computing supersymmetric dark matter properties numerically, JCAP 07 (2004) 008 [astro-ph/0406204] [INSPIRE].
F. Wang, W. Wang and J.M. Yang, Split supersymmetry under GUT and current dark matter constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3121 [arXiv:1310.1750] [INSPIRE].
N. Bernal, A. Djouadi and P. Slavich, The MSSM with heavy scalars, JHEP 07 (2007) 016 [arXiv:0705.1496] [INSPIRE].
N. Bernal, Dark matter direct detection in the MSSM with heavy scalars, JCAP 08 (2009) 022 [arXiv:0905.4239] [INSPIRE].
F. Wang, W. Wang and J.M. Yang, A split SUSY model from SUSY GUT, JHEP 03 (2015) 050 [arXiv:1501.02906] [INSPIRE].
http://www.sciops.esa.int/SA/PLANCK/docs/Planck 2013 results 16.pdf.
WMAP collaboration, J. Dunkley et al., Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Likelihoods and Parameters from the WMAP data, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 180 (2009) 306 [arXiv:0803.0586] [INSPIRE].
G. Altarelli and R. Barbieri, Vacuum polarization effects of new physics on electroweak processes, Phys. Lett. B 253 (1991) 161 [INSPIRE].
M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 381 [INSPIRE].
ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group and SLD Heavy Flavour Group collaborations, Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance, Phys. Rept. 427 (2006) 257 [hep-ex/0509008] [INSPIRE].
XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark Matter Results from 225 Live Days of XENON100 Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 181301 [arXiv:1207.5988] [INSPIRE].
LUX collaboration, D.S. Akerib et al., First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 091303 [arXiv:1310.8214] [INSPIRE].
A. Djouadi and M. Drees, QCD corrections to neutralino nucleon scattering, Phys. Lett. B 484 (2000) 183 [hep-ph/0004205] [INSPIRE].
G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, Dark matter direct detection rate in a generic model with MicrOMEGAs 2.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 747 [arXiv:0803.2360] [INSPIRE].
M. Carena, D. Garcia, U. Nierste and C.E.M. Wagner, Effective Lagrangian for the \( \overline{t}b{H}^{+} \) interaction in the MSSM and charged Higgs phenomenology, Nucl. Phys. B 577 (2000) 88 [hep-ph/9912516] [INSPIRE].
J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata and N. Nagata, Gluon contribution to the dark matter direct detection, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 115007 [arXiv:1007.2601] [INSPIRE].
H. Ohki et al., Nucleon sigma term and strange quark content from lattice QCD with exact chiral symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 054502 [arXiv:0806.4744] [INSPIRE].
MILC collaboration, D. Toussaint and W. Freeman, The Strange quark condensate in the nucleon in 2 + 1 flavor QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 122002 [arXiv:0905.2432] [INSPIRE].
J. Giedt, A.W. Thomas and R.D. Young, Dark matter, the CMSSM and lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 201802 [arXiv:0907.4177] [INSPIRE].
T. Moroi, The Muon anomalous magnetic dipole moment in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 6565 [Erratum ibid. D 56 (1997) 4424] [hep-ph/9512396] [INSPIRE].
M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi, S. Iwamoto and T. Yoshinaga, Muon g − 2 vs LHC in Supersymmetric Models, JHEP 01 (2014) 123 [arXiv:1303.4256] [INSPIRE].
M. Badziak, Z. Lalak, M. Lewicki, M. Olechowski and S. Pokorski, Upper bounds on sparticle masses from muon g − 2 and the Higgs mass and the complementarity of future colliders, JHEP 03 (2015) 003 [arXiv:1411.1450] [INSPIRE].
H. Fargnoli, C. Gnendiger, S. Paßehr, D. Stöckinger and H. Stöckinger-Kim, Two-loop corrections to the muon magnetic moment from fermion/sfermion loops in the MSSM: detailed results, JHEP 02 (2014) 070 [arXiv:1311.1775] [INSPIRE].
H. Fargnoli, C. Gnendiger, S. Paßehr, D. Stöckinger and H. Stöckinger-Kim, Non-decoupling two-loop corrections to (g − 2) μ from fermion/sfermion loops in the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 726 (2013) 717 [arXiv:1309.0980] [INSPIRE].
C. Gnendiger, D. Stöckinger and H. Stöckinger-Kim, The electroweak contributions to (g − 2) μ after the Higgs boson mass measurement, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 053005 [arXiv:1306.5546] [INSPIRE].
F.S. Queiroz and W. Shepherd, New Physics Contributions to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment: A Numerical Code, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 095024 [arXiv:1403.2309] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1504.00505
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, F., Wang, W. & Yang, J.M. Reconcile muon g-2 anomaly with LHC data in SUGRA with generalized gravity mediation. J. High Energ. Phys. 2015, 79 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2015)079
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2015)079