Abstract
The capacity to reason critically and negotiate ideas and differences lies at the heart of quality education. Through critical reasoning we construct, organise, and justify knowledge; and we create new ideas and practices. Despite the emphasis on teaching argumentative writing in school curricula, existing research consistently shows that arguing well presents significant challenges to students of all ages and backgrounds. This paper argues that addressing this issue requires a novel understanding of argumentation not being so much a written form but a form of critical reasoning—the ability to reason, critique justify and evidence. Using classroom video recordings of two primary literacy classes and interviews with the teacher, and drawing on the pedagogic register analysis, the paper identifies pedagogic practices that support the development of students’ abilities to take a stance, inquire about attitude, and reason with evidence. The findings have important implications for the design of effective pedagogic practices to expand students’ potential to reason and critique across primary years of schooling.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
ACARA. (2018). Naplan achievement in reading, writing, language conventions and numeracy: 2018 national report. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu.au/results- and-reports/national-reports
Anderson, R., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., McNurlen, B., Archodidou, A., Kim, S.-y., Reznitskaya, A., Gilbert, L. (2001). The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition and Instruction, 29(1), 1–46.
Chen, H., Lewis, H., & Rose, D. (forthcoming). Understanding literacy transitions: Pedagogic practices in primary wriitng classrooms. In P. Jones, E. Matruglio, & C. Edwards-Groves (Eds.), Transition and continuity in school literacy development. Bloomsbury.
Chen, H., Myhill, D., & Lewis, H. (Eds.). (2020). Developing writers across the primary and secondary years: Growing into writing. Routledge.
Chen, H., & Vale, E. R. (2020). Developing confident writers: Fostering audience awareness in primary school writing classrooms. In H. Chen, D. Myhill, & H. Lewis (Eds.), Developing writers across primary and secondary years: Growing into writing (pp. 131–153). Routledge.
Christie, F. (1995). Pedagogic discourse in the primary school. Linguistics and Education, 7, 221–242.
Christie, F. (2002). Classroom discourse analysis: A functional perspective. Bloomsbury.
Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse. Continuum.
Clark, A., Anderson, R., Kuo, L.-J., Kim, I.-H., Archodidou, A., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2003). Collaborative reasoning: Expanding ways for children to talk and think in school. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 181–198.
Crowell, A., & Kuhn, D. (2014). Developing dialogic argumentation skills: A 3-year intervention study. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(2), 363–381.
Davidson, C., & Edwards-Groves, C. (2018). “But you said this...”: Students’ management of disagreement within a dialogic approach to literacy instruction. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 41(3), 190–200.
Derewianka, B., & Jones, P. (2016). Teaching language in context. Oxford University Press.
Edwards-Groves, C., & Davidson, C. (2017). Agreeing and disagreeing in class discussions. In C. Edwards-Groves & C. Davidson (Eds.), Becoming a meaning maker: Talk and interaction in the dialogic classroom (pp. 114–140). Primary English Teaching Association Australia.
Goldman, S. R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W., Cribb, G., George, M., Greenleaf, C., Project, R. (2016). Disciplinary literacies and learning to read for understanding: A conceptual framework for disciplinary literacy. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 219–246.
Goldman, S. R., & Scardamalia, M. (2013). Managing, understanding, applying, and creating knowledge in the information age: Next-generation challenges and opportunities. Cognition and Instruction, 31(2), 255–269.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Arnold.
Hirvela, A. (2017). Argumentation and second language writing: Are we missing the boat? Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 69–74.
Iordanou, K., Kendeou, P., & Beker, K. (2016). Argumentative reasoning. In J. A. Greene, W. Sandoval, & I. Braten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 39–53). Routledge.
Johns, A. (2017). Augmenting argumentation in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 79–80.
Jonassen, D. H., & Kim, B. (2010). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Design justifications and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(4), 439–457.
Jones, P., Chen, H., Derewianka, B., Freebody, P., Kervin, L., McKenzie, B., Turbill, J. (2014-2018). Transforming literacy outcomes (translit). In: University of Wollongong & the Australian Government (formerly DEEWR).
Jones, P., Matruglio, E., & Rose, D. (forthcoming). Investigating pedagogic discourse in late primary and junior secondary english. In P. Jones, E. Matruglio, & C. Edwards-Groves (Eds.), Transition and continuity in school literacy development. Bloomsbury.
Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education, 94(5), 810–824.
Kuhn, D., & Park, S.-H. (2005). Epistemological understanding and the development of intellectual values. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 111–124.
Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child development, 74(5), 1245–1260.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. Equinox Publishing.
McNaughton, S. (2020). The literacy landscape in Aotearoa, New Zealand. Office of the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor Auckland, New Zealand
Mercer, N. (2013). The social brain, language, and goal- directed collective thinking: A social conception of cognition and its implications for understanding how we think, teach, and learn. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 148–168.
Mercier, H. (2011). Reasoning serves argumentation in children. Cognitive Development, 26(3), 177–191.
Newell, G. E., Beach, R., Smith, J., & VanDerHeide, J. (2011). Teaching and learning argumentative reading and writing: A review of research. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(3), 273–304.
OECD. (2017). Pisa 2015 results: Collaborative problem solving.http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/93ba004b-en
Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L.-J., Clark, A.-M., Miller, B., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2009). Collaborative reasoning: A dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 29–48.
Rose, D. (2014). Analysing pedagogic discourse: An approach from genre and register. Functional Linguistics, 1(11), 1–32.
Rose, D. (2018). Pedagogic register analysis: Mapping choices in teaching and learning. Functional Linguistics, 5(3), 1–33.
Rose, D. (2019). Building a pedagogic metalanguage I: Curriculum genres. In J. Martin, K. Maton, & Y. Doran (Eds.), Accessing academic discourse: Systemic functional linguistics and legitimation code theory (pp. 236–267). Routledge.
Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge, and pedagogy in the sydney school. Sheffield: Equinox.
Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2011). A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. CreateSpace
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, H., Lewis, H. & Myhill, D. Fostering critical reasoning: Developing argumentative competence in early and middle primary years. AJLL 44, 46–61 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652072
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652072