Abstract
In spite of the many benefits of regular physical activity, the majority of Canadians are sedentary. This paper examines the relationship between general social support and physical activity levels. An analysis of data on 29,135 individuals from the 1990 Ontario Health Survey was conducted. Hierarchical multiple regression was used to determine the relationship between measures of general social support, derived from factor analysis, and physical activity levels. Socio-demographic and perceived health status measures were included as control variables. The results showed that general social support, in the form of Social Quantity and Social Frequency (number of friends/ family members and frequency of contact), was significantly associated with higher levels of physical activity. Conversely, support in the form of Familial Structure (marital/cohabitation and parental status) was significantly associated with lower levels of physical activity. The findings indicate the types of general social support that facilitate or hinder participation in physical activity.
Résumé
Malgré les nombreux avantages de l’activité physique régulière, la majorité des Canadiens sont sédentaires. L’étude porte sur la relation entre le soutien social global et les niveaux d’activité physique. Nous avons extrait de l’Enquête sur la santé en Ontario de 1990 des données sur 29 135 personnes. Une analyse de régression hiérarchique multiple a permis de déterminer le lien entre les mesures du soutien social global (dérivées d’une analyse factorielle) et les niveaux d’activité physique. Comme variables de contrôle, nous avons inclus des mesures socio-démographiques et des mesures de l’état de santé perçu. Les résultats montrent que le soutien social global, vu sous l’angle de la quantité des contacts sociaux (nombre d’amis/de membres de la famille) et de leur fréquence, présente une corrélation significative avec des niveaux d’activité physique élevés. Réciproquement, le soutien vu sous l’angle de la structure familiale (état matrimonial/cohabitation et qualité parentale) présente une corrélation significative avec de faibles niveaux d’activité physique. Ces constatations permettent de déterminer les types de soutien social global qui favorisent ou entravent l’activité physique.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General, 1996.
Qinney H, Gauvin L, Wall E (Eds.). Toward Active Living: Proceedings of the International Conference on Physical Activity, Fitness, and Health. Windsor, ON: Human Kinetics, 1994.
Powell K, Thompson P, Casperson C, Kendrick J. Physical activity and the incidence of coronary heart disease. Annu Rev Public Health 1987;8:253–87.
Powell K, Kreuter M, Stephens T, et al. The dimensions of health promotion applied to physical activity. J Public Health Policy 1991;12:492–509.
Blair S, Kohl H, Paffenbarger R, et al. Physical fitness and all cause mortality: A prospective study of healthy men and women. JAMA 1989;262:2395–401.
Shephard R. Aerobic Fitness and Health. Windsor, ON: Human Kinetics, 1994.
Stephens T. Physical activity and mental health in the United States and Canada: Evidence from four population surveys. Prev Med 1988;17:35–47.
Leith L. Foundations of Exercise and Mental Health. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology, Inc., 1994.
Gauthier P, Haman A. Canadian Social Trends: Physical Fitness. Statistics Canada, 1992.
Allison K. Predictors of inactivity: An analysis of the Ontario Health Survey. Can J Public Health 1996;87:354–58.
Willis J, Campbell L. Exercise Psychology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1992.
Godin G, Shephard R. Use of attitude-behavior models in exercise promotion. Sports Med 1990;10:103–21.
Glanz K, Marcus-Lewis F, Rimer B. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory Research, and Practice, 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc, 1997.
House J, Landis K, Umberson D. Social relationships and health. Science 1988;241:540–45.
Cohen S. Psychosocial models of the role of social support in the etiology of physical disease. Health Psychol 1988;7:269–97.
Thoits P. Stress, coping, and social support processes: Where are we? What next? J Health Soc Behav 1995;53–79.
Shumaker S, Hill D. Gender differences in social support and physical health. Health Psychol 1991;10:102–11.
Gottlieb N, Green L. Life events, social network, life-style, and health: An analysis of the 1979 National Survey of Personal Health Practices and Consequences. Health Educ Q 1984;11:91–105.
Potts M, Hurwicz M, Goldstein M, Berkanovic E. Social support, health-promotive beliefs, and preventive health behaviours among the elderly. J Appl Gerontol 1992;11:425–40.
Eaton C, Reynes J, Assaf A, et al. Predicting physical activity change in men and women in two New England communities. Am J Prev Med 1993;9:209–19.
Krause N, Goldenhar L, Liang J, et al. Stress and exercise among the Japanese elderly. Soc Sci Med 1993;36:1429–41.
McDonough P, Rootman I, Corey P, Ferrence R. Working paper No. 4: Interrelations among health behaviours. Ontario Health Survey 1990: Working Papers. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health, 1993.
Osler M. Social network and lifestyle in Danish adults. J Epidemiol Community Health 1995;49:327–28.
Ontario Ministry of Health. Ontario Health Survey 1990: Users Guide Vol. 1, Documentation, and Vol. 2, Microdata Manual. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health, 1992.
Taylor H, Jacobs D, Shucker B, et al. Questionnaire for the assessment of leisure-time physical activities. J Chron Dis 1978;31:741–55.
American College of Sports Medicine. A collection of physical activity questionnaires for health-related research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997;29:62–63.
Canada Fitness Survey. Fitness and Lifestyle in Canada. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Institute, 1983.
Stephens T, Craig C. The Well Being of Canadians: Highlights of the 1988 Campbell’s Survey. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute, 1990.
Gottlieb B. The meaning and importance of social support. In: Quinney H, Gauvin L, Wall E (Eds.). Toward Active Living: Proceedings of the International Conference on Physical Activity, Fitness, and Health. Windsor, ON: Human Kinetics, 1994; 227–32.
Sallis J, Hovell M, Hofstetter C, et al. A multi-variate study of the determinants of vigorous exercise in a community sample. Prev Med 1989;18:20–34.
Frankish C, Milligam C, Reid C. A review of relationships between active living and determinants of health. Soc Sci Med 1998;47:287–301.
Allison K, Dwyer J, Makin S. Perceived barriers to vigorous physical activity among high school students. Prev Med 1999;28:608–15.
Schmitz K, French S, Jeffery R. Correlates of changes in leisure time physical activity over 2 years: The healthy worker project. Prev Med 1997;26:570–79.
Sternfeld B, Ainsworth B, Quesenberry C. Physical activity patterns in a diverse population of women. Prev Med 1999;28:313–23.
Wankel L. The importance of enjoyment to adherence and psychological benefits from physical activity. Int J Sport Psychol 1993;24:151–69.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spanier, P.A., Allison, K.R. General Social Support and Physical Activity: An Analysis of the Ontario Health Survey. Can J Public Health 92, 210–213 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404308
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404308