Abstract
After a quarter of a century, the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, often recognized as a foundational document of health promotion, continues to be relevant for public health. Inspired by the WHO Constitution, the Alma Ata Declaration, and the Lalonde Report, the Ottawa Charter endorses a positive definition of health, situates health as a product of daily life, proposes core values and principles for public health action, and outlines three strategies and five action areas reaching beyond the boundaries of the health care sector. The Charter established a radical agenda for public health, specifically to expressly convey the values public health pursues, thereby increasing the potential for the reflexivity of the field and opportunities to consider complementary values in actions that promote population health. In this paper, we examine how public health has integrated health promotion by exploring examples of changes in public health systems and practice at international and national levels of governance. Nevertheless, an important challenge remains for health promotion: better use of research to understand how the values, principles and processes of health promotion can help to achieve public health mandates. A three-pronged action plan is proposed.
Résumé
Un quart de siècle plus tard, la Charte d’Ottawa pour la promotion de la santé, largement reconnue comme un document fondateur de la promotion de la santé, continue d’être pertinente pour la santé publique. S’appuyant sur la Constitution de l’OMS, la Déclaration d’Alma-Ata et le Rapport Lalonde, la Charte d’Ottawa souscrit à une définition positive de la santé, situe la santé comme un produit de la vie de tous les jours, propose un certain nombre de valeurs et principes fondamentaux pour l’action de santé publique et expose trois stratégies et cinq domaines d’action qui s’étendent au delà du secteur des soins de santé. La Charte établit un programme radical pour la santé publique, celui de rendre explicite les valeurs qu’elle poursuit, accroissant ainsi à la fois le potentiel de réflexivité du champ et sa capacité de prendre en compte d’autres valeurs dans les actions qui visent à accroître la santé des populations. Dans cet article, nous examinons à l’aide d’exemples nationaux et internationaux comment la promotion de la santé a pénétré les pratiques et les systèmes de santé publique. Quoi qu’il en soit, un des défis importants pour la promotion de la santé réside dans une meilleure utilisation de la recherche pour mieux comprendre comment les valeurs, principes et processus mis de l’avant par la promotion de la santé contribuent à la réalisation des mandats de santé publique. Trois priorités d’action sont proposées pour relever ce défi.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
World Health Organization. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Ottawa, ON: WHO, 1986.
Kickbusch I. The contribution of the World Health Organization to a new public health and health promotion. Am J Public Health 2003;93:383–88.
Hills M, McQueen, DV. At issue: Two decades of the Ottawa Charter. Promotion & Education 2007;14 (suppl 2):5.
Saan H. Ottawa 1986 revisited. Promotion & Education 2007;14 (suppl 2):11.
Breslow L. From disease prevention to health promotion. JAMA 1999;281:1030–33.
Fassin D. FrComment faire de la santé publique avec des mots. Une rhétorique à l’oeuvre. Rupture, revue transdisciplinaire en santé 2000;7:58–78.
World Health Organization. The Bangkok Charter for Health Promotion in a Globalized World. WHO, 2005.
De Leeuw E, Tang KC, Beaglehole R. Ottawa to Bangkok — Health promotion’s journey from principles to ‘glocal’ implementation. Health Promot Int 2006;21 (suppl 1):1–4.
World Health Organization. Declaration of Alma Ata. 1978. Available at: https://doi.org/www.who.int (Accessed January 2011).
Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948. Available at: https://doi.org/www.who.int (Accessed January 2011).
Lalonde M. A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians. A Working Document. Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services Canada, 1974. Available at: https://doi.org/www.hcsc.gc.ca (Accessed January 2011).
Parrish, RG. Measuring population health outcomes. Prev Chron Dis 2010;7(4):A71.
Kickbusch I. Health governance. The health society. In: McQueen DV, Kickbusch I, Potvin L, et al. (Eds.), Health & Modernity: The Role of Theory in Health Promotion. New York, NY: Springer, 2007;144–61.
Mann J. Health as a human right. BMJ 1996;312:924–25.
Rootman I, Goodstadt M, Potvin L, Springett J. A framework for health promotion evaluation. In: Rootman I, Goodstadt M, Hyndman B, et al. (Eds.), Evaluation in Health Promotion: Principles and Perspectives. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, 2001;7–15.
Fassin D. L’espace politique de la santé. Paris, France: Presses universitaires de France, 1996.
Porter D. Health, Civilization and the State: A History of Public Health from Ancient to Modern Times. London, UK: Routledge, 1999.
Chapman S. Postmodernism and public health. [Letter] Aust N Z J Public Health 1998;22:403–5.
Mansdotter A, Lindstrom L, Ohman A. Women, men and public health–how the choice of normative theory affects resource allocation. Health Policy 2004;69:351–64.
Balbo L. Thinking health promotion sociologically. In: McQueen DV, Kickbusch I, Potvin L, et al. (Eds.), Health & Modernity: The Role of Theory in Health Promotion. New York: Springer, 2007;129–43.
Potvin L, McQueen, DV. Modernity, public health and health promotion. A reflexive discourse. In: McQueen DV, Kickbusch I, Potvin L, et al. (Eds.), Health & Modernity: The Role of Theory in Health Promotion. New York: Springer, 2007;12–20.
World Health Organization. World Health Assembly resolution WHA 51.12–Health promotion. 1998. Available at: https://doi.org/www.who.int (Accessed January 2011).
Swedish National Committee for Public Health. Health on equal terms–national goals for public health. Scand J Public Health 2001;57 (suppl):1–68.
Jusot F. Les interventions de réduction des inégalités sociales de santé en Europe. In: Potvin L, Moquet MM, Jones CM (Eds.), Réduire les inégalités sociales en santé. Paris: INPES, 2010;73–88.
Creating a Healthier Canada: Making Prevention a Priority - A Declaration on Prevention and Promotion from Canada’s Ministers of Health and Health Promotion/Healthy Living. Ottawa, 2010. Available at: https://doi.org/www.phac-aspc.gc.ca (Accessed April 2011).
World Health Organization & Government of Southern Australia. Adelaide statement on health in all policies. Moving towards a shared governance for health and well-being. Adelaide 2010. Available at: https://doi.org/www.who.int (Accessed January 2011).
Saint-Pierre L, Jobin L, Druet C. FrL’évaluation d’impact sur la santé: un outil de lutte contre les inégalités. In: Potvin L, Moquet MM, Jones CM (Eds.). Réduire les inégalités sociales en santé. Paris: INPES, 2010;136–47.
Puska P, Ståhl T. Health in All Policies—The Finnish initiative: Background, principles, and current issues. Annu Rev Public Health 2010;31:315–28.
Poland B, Green LW, Rootman I (Eds.). Settings for Health Promotion: Linking Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2000.
Dorris M. Health promoting settings: Future directions. Promotion & Education 2006;13:2–4.
De Leeuw E. Evidence for healthy cities: Reflections on practice, method and theory. Health Promot Int 2009;24 (suppl 1):i9–i36.
St Leger L, Kolbe L, Lee A, McCall D, Young I. School health promotion–Achievements, challenges and priorities. In: McQueen DV, Jones CM (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Health Promotion Effectiveness. New York: Springer, 2007;107–24.
UNICEF. The baby friendly hospital initiative. Available at: https://doi.org/www.unicef.org (Accessed January 2011).
Pelikan J, Krajic K, Dietscher C. The health promoting hospital (HPH): Concept and development. Patient Educ Couns 2001;45:239–43.
Potvin L, Gendron S, Bilodeau A, Chabot P. Integrating social science theory into public health practice. Am J Public Health 2005;95:591–95.
Organisation mondiale de la Santé. Combler le fossé en une génération: instaurer l’équité en santé en agissant sur les déterminants sociaux de la santé. Genève: Organisation Mondiale de la Santé, Commission des Déterminants sociaux de la Santé, 2008.
Frohlich KL, Mykhalovskiy E, Miller F, Daniel M. Advancing the population health agenda: Encouraging the integration of social theory into population health research and practice. Can J Public Health 2004;95:392–95.
Kickbusch I. Health promotion–not a tree but a rhizome. In: O’Neill M, Pederson A, Dupéré S, Rootman I (Eds.), Health Promotion in Canada: Critical Perspectives. Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars’ Press, 2006; Chapter 20.
Scriven A, Speller V. Global issues and challenges beyond Ottawa: The way forward. Promotion & Education 2007;14(4):194–98.
Catford J. Implementing the Nairobi call to Action: Africa’s opportunity to light the way. Health Promot Int 2010;25:1–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Acknowledgement: Louise Potvin is the holder of the CHSRF-CIHR Chaire approches communautaires et inégalités de santé (CHSRF-CIHR no. CP1-0526-05).
Conflict of Interest: None to declare.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Potvin, L., Jones, C.M. Twenty-five Years After the Ottawa Charter: The Critical Role of Health Promotion for Public Health. Can J Public Health 102, 244–248 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404041
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404041