Skip to main content
Log in

How to Learn Process-Oriented Thinking: An Experimental Investigation of the Effectiveness of Different Learning Modes

  • Effectiveness of Learning Modes
  • Published:
Schmalenbach Business Review Aims and scope

Abstract

We examine the effectiveness of different learning modes in a process management context. We argue that many organizations will undergo a transformation from a function to a process orientation and that learning matters in this context, as a fundamental change in thinking is required. Using a questionnaire experiment with a sample of 147 participants, we found a significant influence of learning modes on the general success of learning process-oriented thinking. We observe that learning-by-doing is more effective than using documented knowledge. We raise awareness of the less studied underlying variables influencing the success of learning process-oriented thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Ambrosini, Véronique and Cliff Bowman (2001), Tacit knowledge. Some suggestions for operational, Journal of Management Studies 38, 811–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, Masahiko (1986), Horizontal vs. Vertical information structure of the firm, The American Economic Review 76, 971–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, Mary J. and Michael L. Tushman (2003), Exploitation, exploration, and process management. The productivity dilemma revisited, Academy of Management Review 28, 238–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binner, Hartmut F. (2002), Prozessorientierte TQM-Umsetzung, München Wien: Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braganza, Ashley and Andy Bytheway (1997), Process orientation. A key to managing an unpredictable future, in Colin Armistead and Julia Kiely (eds.), Effective organizations. Looking to the future, London: Cassell, 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazanga, Ashley and Nada Korac-Kakabadse (2000), Towards a function and process orientation. Challenges for business leaders in the new millennium, Strategic Change 9, 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Haozhe, Yu Tian, and Patricia J. Daugherty (2009), Measuring process orientation, The International Journal of Logistics Management 20, 213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, Thomas H. and Laurence Prusak (1998), Working knowledge. How organizations manage what they know, Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, Thomas H. and James E. Short (1990), The new industrial engineering. Information technology and business process redesign, Sloan Management Review 31, 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Dulk, Laura and Judith de Ruijter (2008), Managing work-life policies. Disruption versus dependency arguments. Explaining managerial attitudes towards employee utilization of work-life policies, The International Journal of Human Resource Management 19, 1222–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, Michael J. and Ian A. Scott (1999), What is a chief knowledge officer?, Sloan Management Review 40, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Chris, Ashley Braganza, and Rob Lambert (2000), Understanding and managing process initiatives. A framework for developing consensus, Knowledge and Process Management 7, 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, Carmen A. (2003), Prozessorientierte Unternehmensplanung. Analyse, Konzeption und Praxisbeispiele, Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gaitanides, Michael (2007), Prozessorganisation. Entwicklung, Ansätze und Programme des Managements von Geschäfts-prozessen, München: Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, Michael (2010), What is business process management, in Jan vom Brocke and Michael Rosemann (eds.), Handbook on business process management 1. Introduction, methods and information systems, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, Michael and James Champy (1993), Reengineering the corporation. A manifesto for business revolution, New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, H. James (1991), Business process improvement. The breakthrough strategy for total quality, productivity and competitiveness, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawryszkiewycz, Igor (2010), Knowledge management. Organizing knowledge based enterprises, New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howells, Jeremy (1996), Tacit knowledge, innovation and technology transfer, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 8, 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilmann, Ralph H. (1995), A holistic program and critical success factors of corporate transformation, European Management Journal 13, 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlbacher, Markus (2010), The effects of process orientation. A literature review, Business Process Management Journal 16, 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlbacher, Markus and Stefan Gruenwald (2011), Process orientation. Conceptualization and measurement, Business Process Management Journal 17, 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosiol, Erich (1934), Organisation und Betriebswirtschaft, Die Betriebswirtschaft 27, 81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kugeler, Martin and (2011), Design of a process-oriented organizational structure, in Jörg Becker, Martin Kugeler and Michael Rosemann (eds.), Process management. A guide for the design of business processes, 2nd edition, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 187–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, Vinod, Bahar Movahedi, Kayvan M. Lavassani, and Uma Kumar (2010), Unleashing process orientation, Business Process Management Journal 16, 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, Alice (2000), Tacit knowledge, organizational, learning and societal institutions. An integrated framework, Organization Studies 21, 487–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Robert G. and Barrie G. Dale (1998), Business process management. A review and evaluation, Business Process Management Journal 4, 214–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, Frédéric and Bernard Ramanantsoa (1997), The cognitive and behavioural dimensions of organizational learn-ing in a merger. An empirical study, Journal of Management Studies 34, 871–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Barbara and James G. March (1988), Organizational learning, Annual Review of Sociology 14, 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockamy III, Archie and Kevin McCormack (2004), The development of supply chain management process maturity model using the concepts of business process orientation, Supply Chain Management. An International Journal 9, 272–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, Leyland M. (2010), The evolution of organizations and the development of appropriate knowledge structures, Journal of Knowledge Management 14, 190–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, Kevin (2001), Business process orientation. Do you have it?, Quality Progress 34, 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, Kevin P. and William C. Johnson (2001), History of business process orientation, St. Lucie Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McNulty Terry and Ewan Ferlie (2004), Process transformation. Limitations to radical organizational change within public service organizations, Organization Studies 25, 1389–1412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Stefan, Christian Probst, and Clemens Wernsmann (2003), Continuous process management, in J. Becker, M. Kugeler and M. Rosemann (eds.), Process management. A guide for the design of business processes, Berlin et al: Springer, 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, Ikujiro (1991), The knowledge creating company, Harvard Business Review 69, 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, Ikujiro (1994), A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organization Science 5, 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, Ikurijo, Hirotaka Takeuchi, and Katsuhiro Umemoto (1996), A theory of organizational knowledge creation, International Journal of Technology Management 11, 833–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordsieck, Fritz (1931), Aufgabenverteilung und Instanzenbau im Betrieb. Grundprobleme und Grundprinzipien der Organisation des Betriebsaufbaus II, Die Betriebswirtschaft 24, 204–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Österle, Hubert and Robert Winter (2003), Business engineering, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh, Margit and Jetta Frost (2006), Prozessmanagement als Kernkompetenz, Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh, Margit and Alexander W Hunziker (1998), Strategisches Prozessmanagement in der Öffentlichen Verwal-tung, ZeitschriftFührung + Organisation 67, 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloniemi, Susanna (2006), Experience, competence and workplace learning, Journal of Workplace Learning 18, 439–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pathirage, Chaminda P., Dilanthi G. Amaratunga, and Richard P. Haigh (2007), Tacit knowledge and organisational performance. Construction industry performance, Journal of Knowledge Management 11, 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picot, Arnold and Egon Franck (1995), Prozeßorganisation. Eine Bewertung der neuen Ansätze aus Sicht der Organisationslehre, in Michael Nippa and Arnold Picot (eds.), Prozessmanagement und Reengineering. Die Praxis im deutschsprachigen Raum, Frankfurt, New York: Campus, 13–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reijers, Hajo A. (2006), Implementing bpm systems. The role of process orientation, Business Process Management Journal 12, 389–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riege, Andreas and Michael Zulpo (2007), Knowledge transfer process cycle. Between factory floor and middle management, Australian Journal of Management 32, 293–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozinat, Anne and Wil M.P van der Aalst (2005), Conformance testing. Measuring the fit and appropriateness of event logs and process models, in Christoph Bussler and Armin Haller (eds.), Proceedings of Business Process Management Workshops, Heidelberg, 163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sens, Brigitte (2010), Prozessorientierung als Instrument strategischer Unternehmensführung und integrierter Manage-mentsysteme, Science Direct 104, 447–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow den, David (1998), The ecology of a sustainable knowledge program, Knowledge Management 1, 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenmark, Dick (2001), Leveraging tacit organizational knowledge, Journal of Management Information Systems 17, 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, Robert J. (1994), Tacit knowledge and job success, in Neil Anderson and Peter Herriot (eds.), Assessment and selection in organizations. Methods and practice for recruitment and appraisal, London: Wiley, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trkman, Peter, Mojca Indihar Stemberger, Jurij Jaklic, and Ales Groznik (2007), Process approach to supply chain integration, Supply Chain Management, An International Journal 12, 116–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ungan, Mustafa (2006), Towards a better understanding of process documentation, The TQM Magazine 18, 400–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergidis, Konstantino, Christopher J. Ashutosh Tiwari (2008), Business process perspectives. Theoretical developments vs. Real-world practice, International Journal of Production Economics 114, 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weske, Mathias (2007), Business process management. Concepts, languages, architectures, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Leyer.

Additional information

We thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on previous versions of our manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leyer, M., Wollersheim, J. How to Learn Process-Oriented Thinking: An Experimental Investigation of the Effectiveness of Different Learning Modes. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 65, 454–473 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396866

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396866

JEL Classification

Keywords

Navigation