Abstract
The concept of the motivating operation (MO) has been subject to 3 criticisms: (a) the terms and concepts employed do not always overlap with traditional behavior-analytic verbal practices; (b) the dual nature of the MO is unclear; and (c) there is a lack of adequate contact with empirical data. We offer a more parsimonious approach to motivation, extending Skinner’s (1938, 1953) early work on this topic, and introduce two new key terms: consequence-valuing operation (CVO) and consequence-valuing process (CVP). Our account focuses on the value of the reinforcer in terms of the level of responding that occurs relative to some previously measured baseline. We suggest that the concepts of the CVO and CVP will facilitate the identification, analysis, and manipulation of motivational factors in the treatment of behavior disorders.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
ADELINIS, J. D., PIAZZA, C. C., FISHER, W. W., & HANLEY, G. P. (1997). The establishing effects of client location on self-injurious behavior. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 18, 383–391.
ALLYON, T., & Azrin, N. H. (1968). Reinforcer sampling: A technique for increasing the behavior of mental patients. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 13–20.
AUSTIN, M. P., MITCHELL, P., & GOODWIN, G. M. (2001). Cognitive defects in depression: Possible implications for neuropathology. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 200–206.
CATANIA, C. A. (1992). Learning (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, Nj: Prentice-Hall.
CATANIA, C. A. (1993). Coming to terms with establishing operations. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 219–224.
CHERPAS, C. (1993). Do establishing operations alter reinforcement effectiveness? The Behavior Analyst, 16, 347–349.
CHIESA, M. (1994). Radical behaviorism: The philosophy and the science. Boston, Ma: Authors Cooperative.
CONNERS, J., IWATA, B. A., KAHNG, S., HANLEY, G. P., WORSDELL, A. S., & THOMPSON, R. H. (2000). Differential responding in the presence and absence of discriminative stimuli during multielement functional analyses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 299–308.
DELEON, I. G., FISHER, W. W., CATTER, V. R., MAGLIERI, K., HERMAN, K., & MARHEFKA, J. (2001). Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 463–473.
DOUGHER, M. J. (1983). Clinical effects of response deprivation and response satiation procedures. Behavior Therapy, 14, 286–298.
GULLEY, V., & NORTHUP, J. (1997). Comprehensive school-based behavioral assessment of the effects of methylphenidate. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 627–638.
HANLEY, G. P., IWATA, B. A., LINDBERG, J. S., & CONNERS, J. (2003). Response-restriction analysis: I. Assessment of activity preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 47–58.
HANLEY, G. P., IWATA, B. A., ROSCOE, E. M., THOMPSON, R. H., & LINDBERG, J. S. (2003). Response-restriction analysis: II. Alteration of activity preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 59–76.
HAYES, S. C., KOHLENBERG, B. S., & HAYES, L. J. (1991). The transfer of specific and general consequential functions through simple and conditional equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 56, 119–137.
HINELINE, P. N. (1980). The language of behavior analysis: Its community, its functions, and its limitations. Behaviorism, 8, 67–86.
HORNER, R. H., DAY, M. H., & DAY, J. R. (1997). Using neutralizing routines to reduce problem behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 601–613.
HURSH, S. R. (1978). The economics of daily consumption controlling food-and water-reinforced responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 29, 475–491.
IWATA, B. A., SMITH, R. G., & MICHAEL, J. L. (2000). Current research on the influence of establishing operations on behavior in applied settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 411–418.
KELLER, F. S., & SCHOENFELD, W. N. (1950). Principles of psychology. New york: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
KLATT, K. P., & MORRIS, E. K. (2001). The Premack principle, response deprivation, and establishing operations. The Behavior Analyst, 24, 173–180.
LARAWAY, S., SNYCERSKI, S., MICHAEL, J., & POLING, A. (2001/2002). The abative effect: A new term to describe the action of antecedents that reduce operant responding. The Analysis of Verbal behavior, 18, 101–104.
LARAWAY, S., Snycerski, S., Michael, J., & Poling, A. (2003). Motivating operations and terms to describe them: Some further refinements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 407–414.
LEIGLAND, S. (1984). On “setting events” and related concepts. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 41–45.
MCDEVITT, M. A., & Fantino, E. (1993). Establishing operations and the discriminative stimulus. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 225–227.
MCGILL, P. (1999). Establishing operations: Implications for the assessment, treatment, and prevention of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 393–418.
MCPHERSON, A., & Osborne, J. G. (1988). Control of behavior by an establishing stimulus. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 49, 213–227.
MICHAEL, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155.
MICHAEL, J. (1983). Evocative and repertoire-altering effects of an environmental event. The Analysis of Verbal behavior, 2, 19–21.
MICHAEL, J. (1988). Establishing operations and the mand. The Analysis of Verbal behavior, 2, 19–21.
MICHAEL, J. (1993a). Establishing operations. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 191–206.
MICHAEL, J. (1993b). Concepts and principles of behavior analysis. Kalamazoo, Mi: Society for the Advancement of Behavior Analysis.
MICHAEL, J. (2000). Implications and refinements of the establishing operation concept. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 401–410.
MICHAEL, J., Hixson, M. D., & Clark, J. W. (1997). The role of motivation in the S-R issue. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 67, 239–241.
MURPHY, E. S., MCSWEENEY, F. K., SMITH, R. G., & MCCOMAS, J. J. (2003). Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: Theoretical, methodological, and practical implications for applied research. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 421–438.
PERRY, A.C., & FISHER, W. W. (2001). Behavioral economic influences on treatments designed to decrease destructive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 211–215.
SKINNER, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Oxford: Appleton-Century.
SKINNER, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277.
SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New york: Macmillan.
SKINNER, B. F. (1999). The genetic nature of the concepts of stimulus and response. I? Cumulative record: Definitive edition (pp. 504-524). Acton, Ma: Copley. (Original work published 1935).
SMITH, R. G., & IWATA, B. A. (1997). Antecedent influences on behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 343–375.
STONER, G., CAREY, S., IKEDA, M., & SHINN, M. (1994). The utility of curriculum-based measurement for evaluating the effects of methylphenidate on academic performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 101–113.
VALDIVIA, S., LUCIANO, C., & MOLINA, F. J. (2006). Verbal regulation of motivational states. The Psychological Record, 56, 577–595.
VOLLMER, T. R., & IWATA, B. A. (1991). Establishing operations and reinforcement effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 279–291.
WHELAN, R., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2004). The transformation of consequential functions in accordance with the relational frames of Same and Opposite. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 82, 177–195.
WHELAN, R., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & DYMOND, S. (2006). The transformation of consequential functions in accordance with the relational frames of more-than and less-than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 86, 317–335.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whelan, R., Barnes-Holmes, D. Consequence Valuing as Operation and Process: A Parsimonious Analysis of Motivation. Psychol Rec 60, 337–354 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395711
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395711