Abstract
The philosophy of science is the branch of philosophy that critically examines the foundations, assumptions, methods, products, and implications of the activity called science. The present sketch reviews the historical development of the philosophy of science, representative individuals in the field, and topics of longstanding interest. The sketch is intended to prepare readers for subsequent discussions on behaviorism, cognitive psychology, and the meaning of mental terms.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
ACHINSTEIN, P. (1968). Concepts of science: A philosophical analysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
BAARS, B. J. (1986). The cognitive revolution in psychology. New York: Guilford.
BERGMANN, G., & SPENCE, K. W. (1941). Operationism and theory in psychology. Psychological Review, 48, 1–14.
BRIDGMAN, P. W. (1927). The logic of modern physics. New York: Macmillan
CARNAP, R. (1936). Testability and meaning. Philosophy of Science, 3, 419–471.
CARNAP, R. (1937). Testability and meaning—continued. Philosophy of Science, 4, 1–40.
FEIGL, H. (1967). The “mental” and the “physical.”. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
FLANAGAN, O. (1991). The science of the mind (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Bradford/Mit Press.
FODOR, J. A. (1968). Psychological explanation. New York: Random House.
GARDNER, H. (1985). The mind’s new science. New York: Basic Books.
HARRE, R. (2001). Cognitive science: A philosophical introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
KUHN, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MACCORQUODALE, K., & MEEHL, P. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 95–107.
MEEHL, P. (1967). Theory-testing in psychology and physics: A methodological paradox. Philosophy of Science, 34, 103–115.
PASSMORE, J. (1967). Logical positivism. In P. Edwards (Ed.), The encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol. 5, pp. 52–57). New York: Macmillan.
POPPER, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
QUINE, W. V. O. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. Philosophical Review, 60, 20–43.
SMITH, L. D. (1986). Behaviorism and logical positivism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
SPENCE, K. W. (1944). The nature of theory construction in contemporary psychology. Psychological Review, 51, 47–68.
SPENCE, K. W. (1948). The postulates and methods of “behaviorism.” Psychological Review, 55, 67–78.
WATSON, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177.
WHITEHEAD, A. N., & RUSSELL, B. (1910). Principia Mathematica, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
WHITEHEAD, A. N., & RUSSELL, B. (1912). Principia Mathematica, Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
WHITEHEAD, A. N., & RUSSELL, B. (1913). Principia Mathematica, Volume 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
WITTGENSTEIN, L. (1922). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Routledge.
WITTGENSTEIN, L. (1973). Philosophical investigations (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. (Original edition published in 1953; trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I thank Marshall Dermer for helpful comments on an earlier version of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moore, J. Philosophy of Science, with Special Consideration Given to Behaviorism as the Philosophy of the Science of Behavior. Psychol Rec 60, 137–150 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395698
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395698