Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare systematically the effectiveness of the respondent-type training procedure and the matching-to-sample training procedure. In Experiment 1, a within-subject design was used, to compare the effectiveness of the two procedures. In Condition 1, students were trained using the respondent-type training procedure (60 training trials) and tested for the emergence of symmetry and equivalence responding using a matching-to-sample test. Students were subsequently trained using the matching-to-sample training procedure (60 training trials) and tested using a matching-to-sample test. In Condition 2, the order of the training and testing was reversed (i.e., i, MTS training; ii, MTS test, iii, respondent training; iv, MTS test). Experiment 2 was identical to Experiment 1, except that during matching-to-sample training subjects were required to produce 12 consecutively correct responses before an equivalence test. During respondent-type training students were presented with 12 training trials. Experiment 3 was identical to Experiment 2 except that the two negative comparisons were removed from matching-to-sampte training. Experiment 4 was identical to Experiment 3 except that the correct comparison appeared to the right, center, or left of the screen and three response keys were used. In Experiments 1, 2, and 3 respondent-type training was more effective than matching-to-sample training. In Experiment 4 when the negative comparisons were removed from matching-to-sample training and when the spatial position of the correct comparison varied both procedures were equally effective.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
BARNES, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91–124.
DYMOND, S., & BARNES, D. (1994). A transfer of self-discrimination response functions through equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 251–267.
FIELDS, L., ADAMS, B. J., NEWMAN S., & VERHAVE T. (1992). Interactions among emergent relations during equivalence class formation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45B, 125–138.
FIELDS, L., ADAMS, B. J., & VERHAVE, T. (1993). The effects of equivalence class structure on test performances. The Psychological Record, 43, 697–712.
FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1987). The structure of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 317–332.
HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues of verbal behavior (pp. 19–40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
HEALY, O., BARNES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (1998), Derived relational responding as an operant: The effects of between-session feedback. The Psychological Record, 48, 511–536.
LEADER, G. & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2001). Establishing fraction-decimal equivalence using a respondent-type training procedure. The Psychological Record, 51, 151–165.
LEADER, G., BARNES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (1996), Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent-type training procedure. The Psychological Record, 46, 685–706.
LEADER, G., SMEETS, P. M., & BARNES, D. (2000). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent-type training procedure 111. The Psychological Record, 50, 63–78.
PILGRIM, C., & GALIZIO, M. (1990). Relations between baseline contingencies and equivalence probe performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54 213–224.
PILGRIM, C., & GALIZIO, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: I. Adults. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 63, 225–238.
ROCHE, B., BARNES, D., & SMEETS P. (1997). Incongruous stimulus pairings and conditional discrimination training: Effects on relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 143–160.
SAUNDERS, R. R., & GREEN, G. (1999). A discrimination analysis of training-structure effects on stimulus equivalence outcomes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 117–137.
SAUNDERS, K. J., SAUNDERS, R. R., WILLIAMS, D. W., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1993). An interaction of instructions and training design on stimulus class formation: Extending the analysis of equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 725–744.
SIDMAN, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalence. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5–13.
SIDMAN, M. (1980). A note on the measurement of conditional discrimination. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 33, 285–289.
SIDMAN, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent and verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. A. Zeiier (Eds.), Analysis and interaction of behavioral units (pp. 213–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
SIDMAN, M. (1987). Two choices are not enough. Behavior Analysis, 22, 11–18.
SIDMAN, M., & CRESSON, O. (1973). Reading and crossmodal transfer of stmulus equivalence in severe retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 513–523.
SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching-to- sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.
SMEETS, R. M., LEADER, G. & BARNES, D. (1997). Establishing Stimulus classes in adults and children using a respondent-type training procedure: A follow-up study. The Psychological Record, 47, 285–308.
WULFERT, E., DOUGHER, M.J., & GREEN WAY, D. E. (1991). Protocol analysis of the correspondence of verbal behavior and equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 489–504.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was conducted as part of Geraldine Leader’s doctoral research program under the supervision of Dermot Barnes-Holmes. These data were presented at the Symposium on Stimulus Equivalence at the Annual European Meeting of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Group, London, April 1996.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leader, G., Barnes-Holmes, D. Matching-To-Sample and Respondent-Type Training as Methods for Producing Equivalence Relations: Isolating The Critical Variable. Psychol Rec 51, 429–444 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395407
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395407