Abstract
Previous research has demonstrated that conditioned elicitation functions can transfer via stimulus equivalence classes. However, thus far investigations in this area have been limited to stimulus equivalence classes involving single element stimuli. This study attempted to demonstrate the transfer of eliciting functions via emergent relations involving compound stimuli. Eight college students participated in this study. Six of these participated in all experimental procedures, while the remaining two served as controls and did not receive some phases of the experiment. The experimental participants were first taught nine conditional relations of compound stimuli and unitary stimuli (AC-B & BC-A) using match-to-sample training. They were then tested for the emergence of untrained relations involving different combinations of the previously learne9 compound-single element relations and compound-compound relations (AC-AC or AB-AB or BC-BC). A classical conditioning procedure was then performed in which one compound stimulus from one class was paired with mild electric shock (1.0-2.0 mA) while two other compounds from two different classes were presented in the absence of shock. Participants were then presented with other compounds from the appropriate classes to assess whether the eliciting function had transferred to stimuli which were members of the same class as the originally conditioned stimulus. The control participants received the same procedures except for the initial conditional discrimination training of the compound-single relations and the testing for the emergence of compound-single relations. Four of thoe six experimental participants demonstrated transfer of the eliciting function. An analysis of the performance of both of the individuals who failed to demonstrate the transfer revealed that they may have failed to ° maintain the classes throughout the experiment. One participant discontinued the experiment before further procedures
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
AUGUSTSON, E. M. (1995). Comments on electrodermal assessments as a measure of classical conditioning in humans. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 13, 29–30.
AUGUSTSON, E. M., & DOUGHER, M. J. (1997). Transfer of avoidance evoking functions via stimulus equivalence. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 28 (3), 181–191.
AUGUSTSON, E. M., MARKHAM, M. R., & DOUGHER, M. J. (1994). A methodological note regarding human classical conditioning. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 12(1), 6–7.
BARLOW, D. H. (1988). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic. New York: The Guilford Press.
BARNES, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91–124.
BARNES, D., & ROCHE, B. (1996). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory are fundamentally different. A reply to Saunder’s commentary. The Psychological Record, 46, 489–508.
BARNES, D., SMEETS, R M., & LEADER, G. (1996). Procedures for generating emergent matching performances: Implications for stimulus equivalence. In T. R. Zental & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Advances in psychology series: The formation of stimulus classes (pp. 153–171). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
BOND, N. W., & SIDDLE, D. A. T. (1996). The preparedness account of social phobias: Some data and alternative explanations. In R. M. Rapee (Ed.), Current controversies in the anxiety disorders, (pp. 291–316). New York: The Guilford Press.
BUSH, K. M., SIDMAN, M., & DEROSE, T. (1989). Contextual control of emergent equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 29–45.
CLARK, D. M. (1988). A cognitive model of panic attacks. In S. Rachman & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Panic: Psychological perspectives. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
DOUGHER, M. J., DUGUSTSON, E. M., MARKHAM, M. R., GREENWAY, D. E., & WULFERT, E. (1994). The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 331–351.
DOUGHER, M. J., & MARKHAM, M. R. (1994). Stimulus equivalence, functional equivalence and the transfer of function. In S. C. Hayes, L. H. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 71–90). Reno, NV: Context Press.
DOUGHER, M. J., & MARKHAM, M. R. (1996). Stimulus classes and untrained acquisition of stimulus functions. In T. R. Zental & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Advances in psychology series: The formation of stimulus classes (pp. 137–152). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
DUBE, W. V., MCDONALD, S., & MCILVANE, W. J. (1992). A note on the relationship between equivalence classes and functional stimulus classes. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 9, 5–8.
DYMOND, S., & BARNES, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163–184.
EIFERT, G. H. (1987). Language conditioning: Clinical issues and applications in behavior therapy. In H. J. Eysenck & I. M. Martin (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of behavior therapy (pp. 167–193). New York: Plenum.
EIFERT, G. H. (1990). The acquisition and treatment of phobic anxiety: A paradigmatic behavioral perspective. In G. H. Eifert & I. M. Evans (Eds.), Unifying behavior therapy: Contributions of paradigmatic behaviorism (pp. 173–200). New York: Springer.
FIELDS, L., DDAMS, B. J., VERHAVE, T., & NEWMAN, S. (1993). Are stimuli in equivalence classes equally related to each other? The Psychological Record, 43, 85–106.
FORSYTH, J. P., & EIFERT, G. H. (1996). Systemic alarms in fear conditioning I: A reappraisal of what is being conditioned. Behavior Therapy, 27, 441–462.
FORSYTH, J. R, & EIFERT, G. H. (1998). Phobic anxiety and panic: An integrative behavioral account of their origin and treatment. In J. J. Pluad & G. H. Eifert (Eds.), From behavior theory to behavior therapy (pp. 38–67). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19–41). Reno, NV: Context Press.
HAYES, S. C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In S. C. Hayes, L. H. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 11–30). Reno, NV: Context Press.
HAYES, S. C. & BARNES, D. (1997). Analyzing derived stimulus relations requires more than the concept of stimulus classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 235–243.
HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1992). Some clinical implications of contextualistic behaviorism: The example of cognition. Behavior Therapy, 23, 225–249.
HAYES, S. C., GIFFORD, E. V., & WILSON, K. G. (1996). Stimulus classes and stimulus relations: Arbitrarily applicable relational responding as an operant. In T. R. Zental & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Advances in psychology series: The formation of stimulus classes (pp. 279–299). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
HAYES, S. C., & WILSON, K. G. (1993). Some applied implications of a contemporary behavior-analytic account of verbal events. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 283–301.
LEVIS, D. J., & SMITH, J. E. (1987). Getting individual differences in autonomic reactivity to work for you instead of against you: Determining the dominant “psychological” response channel on the basis of a “biological” stress test. Psychophysiology, 24, 346–352.
LOWENKRON, B. (1998). Some logical functions of joint control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 69, 327–254.
LYKKEN, D. T., & VENABLES, P. H. (1971). Direct measurement of skin conductance: A proposal for standardization. Psychophysiology, 8, 656–672.
LYNCH, D. C., & GREEN, G. (1991). Development and crossmodal transfer of contextual control of emergent stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 139–154.
MARKHAM, M. R., & DOUGHER, M. J. (1993). Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 529–542.
MENZIES, R. G., & CLARKE, J. C. (1995). The etiology of phobias: A nonassociative account. Clinical Psychology Review, 15, 23–48.
OHMAN, A., DIMBERG, U., & OST, L. (1985). Animal and social phobias: Biological constraints on learned fear responses. In S. Reiss & R. R. Bootzin (Eds.), Theoretical issues in behavior therapy (pp. 123–175). New York: Academic Press.
RAPEE, R. M. (1996). Information processing views of panic disorder. In R. M. Rapee (Ed), Current controversies in the anxiety disorders. New York: The Guilford Press.
ROCHE, B., & BARNES, D. (1997). A transformation of respondent conditioned stimulus function in accordance with arbitrarily applicable relations. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 275–302.
SAUNDERS, R. R. & GREEN, G. (1992). The nonequivalence of behavioral and mathematical equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 227–241.
SERNA, R. W. (1991). Interchangeability of stimulus terms in five-term contingencies. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 9, 2–3.
SIDMAN, M. (1987). Two choices are not enough. Behavior Analysis, 22, 11–18.
SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative, Inc.
SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. O. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior; 37, 5–22.
SIDMAN, M., WYNNE, C. K., MAGUIRE, R. W., & BARNES, T. (1989). Functional classes and equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 261–274.
SMEETS, P. M., SCHENK, J. J. & BARNES, D. (1994). Establishing transfer from identity to arbitrary matching tasks via complex stimuli under testing conditions: A follow-up study. The Psychological Record, 44, 521–536.
SMEETS, P. M., SCHENK, J. J., & BARNES, D. (1995). Establishing arbitrary stimulus classes via identity matching training and non-reinforced matching with complex stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 311–328.
SMEETS, P. M., & STREIFEL, S. (1994). Matching to complex stimuli under non-reinforced conditions: Errorless transfer from identity to arbitrary matching tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 39–62.
SPENCER, T. J., & CHASE, P. N. (1996). Speed analysis of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 643–659.
STAATS, A. W. (1990). Paradigmatic behavior therapy: A unified framework for theory, research, and practice. In G. H. Eifert & I. M. Evans (Eds.), Unifying behavior therapy: Contributions of paradigmatic behaviorism (pp. 14–54). New York: Springer.
STAATS, A. W. (1995). Paradigmatic behaviorism and paradigmatic behavior therapy. In W. O’donohue & L. Krasner (Eds.), Theories of behavior therapy: Exploring behavior change (pp. 659–692). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
STAATS, C. K., & STAATS, A. W. (1957). Meaning established by classical conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 74–80.
STAATS, A. W., & STAATS, C. K. (1958). Attitudes established by classical conditioning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 57, 37–40.
STAATS, A. W., STAATS, C. K., & CRAWFORD, H. L. (1962). First-order conditioning of a Csr and the parallel conditioning of meaning. Journal of General Psychology, 67, 159–167.
STAATS, A. W., STAATS, C. K., & HEARD, W. G. (1959). Language conditioning of meaning to meaning using a semantic generalization paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 187–192.
STROMER, R., MCILVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., & MACKAY, H. A. (1993). Assessing control by elements of complex stimuli in delayed matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 83–102.
STROMER, R., MCILVANE, W. J., & SERNA, R. W. (1993). Complex stimulus control and equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 585–598.
STROMER, R., & STROMER, J. B. (1990a). The formation of arbitrary stimulus classes in matching to complex samples. The Psychological Record, 40, 51–66.
STROMER, R., & STROMER, J. B. (1990b). Matching to complex samples: Further study of arbitrary stimulus classes. The Psychological Record, 40, 505–516.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Augustson, E.M., Dougher, M.J. & Markham, M.R. Emergence of Conditional Stimulus Relations and Transfer of Respondent Eliciting Functions Among Compound Stimuli. Psychol Rec 50, 745–770 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395381
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395381