Abstract
This study examined whether nonreinforced contiguous presentation of visual stimuli by means of complex stimuli in a simple discrimination context would lead to emergent simple and conditional relations between the complex elements. Eight preschool children were taught identity-matching with four different colors and two simple discrimination tasks, A1/A2 and A3/A4 with, for example, A1 and A3 being correct and A2 and A4 incorrect. Initially, probes were given with color-shape complex stimuli: [A1B1]/[A2B2] and [A3B3]/[A4B4]. When children consistently selected a complex stimulus on each probe, for example [A1B1] and [A3B3], probes were given with shapes only: B1/B2 and B3/B4. When children consistently selected B1 and B3, for example, arbitrary-matching probes were given that presented single colors (A stimuli) and shapes (B stimuli) as samples and comparisons (A-B and B-A probes). On these probes, the sample and comparisons were elements of either previous designated S+ or S− complex stimuli. For example, with sample A1 or A3, comparisons B1 and B3 were presented (elements of previous S+ complex stimuli). With sample A2 or A4, comparisons B2 and B4 were presented (elements of previous S− complex stimuli). The results for six subjects on A-B and B-A arbitrary-matching probes showed that the nonreinforced contiguous presentation of A and B is not restricted to a matching-to-sample context for generating conditional relations between corresponding elements of complex stimuli. Finally, an attempt is made to identify the conditions under which conditional relations between the elements of complex stimuli are likely to occur.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BARNES, D., & KEENAN, M. (1993). A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and nonarbitrary functions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 61–81.
BERRYMAN, R., CUMMING, W. W., COHEN, L. R., & JOHNSON, D. F. (1965). Acquisition and transfer of simultaneous oddity. Psychological Reports, 17, 767–775.
BOELENS, H. (1990). Emergent simple discrimination in children: Role of contiguity. Behavioural Processes, 22, 13–21.
BOELENS, H., & SMEETS, P. M. (1990). An analysis of emergent simple discrimination in children. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42B, 135–152.
DE ROSE, J. C., MCILVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., GALPIN, V. C., & STODDARD, L. T. (1988). Emergent simple discrimination established by indirect relation to differential consequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 1–20.
DE ROSE, J. C., MCILVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., & STODDARD, L. T. (1988). Stimulus class formation and functional equivalence in moderately retarded individuals’ conditional discrimination. Behavioural Processes, 17, 167–175.
DYMOND, S., & BARNES, D. (1994). A transfer of self-discrimination response functions through equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62 (2), 251–267.
FIELDS, L., ADAMS, B. J., VERHAVE, T., & NEWMAN, S. (1993). Are stimuli in equivalence classes equally related to each other? The Psychological Record, 43, 85–105.
HAYES, S. C., DEVANY, J. M., KOHLENBERG, B. S., BROWNSTEIN, A. J., & SHELBY, J. (1987). Stimulus equivalence and the symbolic control of behavior. Revista Mexicana deAnalisis de la Conducta, 13, 361–374.
HAYES, S. C., KOHLENBERG, B. S., & HAYES, L. J. (1991). The transfer of specific and general consequential functions through simple and conditional equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 110–137.
LAZAR, R. M. (1977). Extending sequence-class membership with matching-to- sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 381–392.
LAZAR, R. M., & KOTLARCHYK, B. J. (1986). Second-order control of sequence-class equivalences in children. Behavioural Processes, 13, 205–215.
LYNCH, D. O., & GREEN, G. (1991). Development and crossmodal transfer of contextual control of equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 139–154.
MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1974). The psychology of animal learning (pp. 543–616). New Vfork: Academic Press
MAGUIRE, R. W., STROMER, R., MACKAY, H. A., & DEMIS, C. A. (1994). Matching to complex samples and stimulus class formation in adults with autism and young children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24 (6), 753–772.
MARKHAM, M. R., & DOUGHER, M. J. (1993). Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 529–542.
MCILVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., KLEDARAS, J. B., DE ROSE, J. C., & STODDARD, L. T. (1992). Stimulus-reinforcer relations and conditional discrimination. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 43–67). Reno, NV: Context Press.
SCHENK, J. J. (1993). Emergent conditional discrimination in children: Matching to compound stimuli. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46B (4), 345–365.
SIDMAN, M. (1992). Equivalence relations: Some basic considerations. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 15–27). Reno, NV: Context Press.
SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.
SIDMAN, M., WYNNE, C. K., MAGUIRE, R. W., & BARNES, T. (1989). Functional classes and equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 261–274.
SMEETS, P. M. (1991). Emergent simple discrimination in children: Transfer of stimulus control under nonreinforced conditions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43B, 361–388.
SMEETS, P. M. (1993). Emergent simple discrimination in children: Preference for non-preferred stimuli. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46B, 321–343.
SMEETS, P. M., BARNES, D., & SCHENK, J. J. (Submitted for publication). Emergent simple discriminations and conditional relations in children.
SMEETS, P. M., SCHENK, J. J., & BARNES, D. (1994). Establishing transfer from identity to arbitrary matching tasks via complex stimuli under testing conditions: A follow-up study. The Psychological Record, 44, 521–536.
SMEETS, P. M., & STRIEFEL, S. (1994). Matching to complex stimuli under non-reinforced conditions: Errorless transfer from identity to arbitrary matching tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47B (1), 39–62.
STROMER, R., & MACKAY, H. A. (1990). Arbitrary stimulus relations and delayed identity matching to complex samples. Experimental Analysis of Behavior Bulletin, 8, 22–25.
STROMER, R., & MACKAY, H. A. (1992). Spelling and emergent picture-printed word relations established with delayed identity matching to complex samples. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 893–904.
STROMER, R., & MACKAY, H. A. (1993). Delayed identity matching to complex samples: Teaching students with mental retardation spelling and prerequisites for equivalence classes. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 14, 19–38.
STROMER, R., MCILVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., & MACKAY, H. A. (1993). Assessing control by elements of complex stimuli in delayed matching-to- sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 83–102.
STROMER, R., MCILVANE, W. J., & SERNA, R. W. (1993). Complex stimulus control and equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 585–598.
STROMER, R., & STROMER, J. B. (1990a). The formation of stimulus classes in matching to complex samples. The Psychological Record, 40, 51–66.
STROMER, R., & STROMER, J. B. (1990b). Matching to complex samples: Further study of arbitrary stimulus classes. The Psychological Record, 40, 505–516.
STROMER, R., & STROMER, J. B. (1992). Formation of arbitrary stimulus classes in matching to complex samples: Supplementary data. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 505–506.
WILLIAMS, B. A. (1984). Stimulus control and associative learning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 469–483.
WULFERT, E., & HAYES, S. C. (1988). Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 125–144.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author expresses appreciation to The Eerste Leidse Schoolvereniging for participation in this study, Mrs. Sonia Markus and Mrs. Naomi Hylkema for their assistance in conducting the experiment, and Robert Stromer and Paul Smeets for their helpful comments on previous versions of the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schenk, J.J. Complex Stimuli in Nonreinforced Simple Discrimination Tasks: Emergent Simple and Conditional Discriminations. Psychol Rec 45, 477–494 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395156
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395156