Abstract
A digital computer and microfilm plotter were used to produce a semirandom picture similar in composition to Piet Mondrian’s painting “Composition With Lines” (1917). Reproductions of both pictures were then presented to 100 subjects whose tasks were to identify the computer picture and to indicate which picture they preferred. Only 28% of the Ss were able to correctly identify the computer-generated picture, while 59% of the Ss preferred the computer-generated picture. Both percentages were statistically different (0.05 level) from selections based upon chance according to a binomial test.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
BRADLEY, J. 1944. “Greatest Dutch Painter of our Time.” Knickerbocker Weekly, Feb. 14, 3, (51), 16.
LEWIS, D. 1957. Mondrian. New York: George Wittenborn, Inc.
MONDRIAN, P. 1945. “Toward the True Vision of Reality.” In Plastic Art and Pure Plastic Art, New York: Wittenborn and Company.
SEUPHOR, M. 1962. Abstract Painting. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc.
SEUPHOR, M. 1957. Piet Mondrian. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc.
WALKER, HELEN M. & LEV, J. 1953. Statistical Inference. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
WEITZ, M. 1956. “The Role of Theory in Aesthetics.” Journal of Aesthetics and Ah Criticism, 15, 27–35.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Noll, A.M. Human or Machine: A Subjective Comparison of Piet Mondrian’s “Composition with Lines” (1917) and a Computer-Generated Picture. Psychol Rec 16, 1–10 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393635
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393635