Abstract
This research examined the role the two constituents of joint control, the tact and the echoic, play in producing accurate selections of novel stimuli in response to their spoken descriptions. Experiment 1 examined the role of tacts. In response to unfamiliar spoken descriptions, children learned to select from among six successively presented comparisons which varied in their color, shape, and border features. Repeated testing and training revealed that accurate selecting with new combinations of the same colors, shapes and borders, did not occur until after the children could themselves tact the individual color, shape and border features with the unfamiliar descriptions. Experiment 2 examined the role of self-echoics. Here, the stimulus features were given their familiar names, but the rehearsal of these names, while searching among the six successively presented comparisons, was impeded by a distracter task. Under these conditions selection of the correct comparison was found to depend on its position in the order of presentation. Correct comparisons presented earlier in the order, and presumably less effected by the distracter task, were more likely to be selected than correct comparisons presented later in the serial order. Taken together, these data suggest that generalized stimulus selection must be under joint tact/echoic control. The data also illustrate the distinction between mediated selection of a stimulus in response to its description (i.e., selection under joint control) and the traditional conception of an unmediated selection response evoked as a result of a heightened response probability in a conditional discrimination.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bickel, W. & Etzel, B. C. (1985). The quantal nature of controlling stimulus-response relations as measured in tests of stimulus generalization. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 44, 245–270.
Cohen, L. R., Brady, J., & Lowry, M. (1981). The role of differential responding in match-ing-to-sample and delayed matching performance. In M. L. Commons & J. A. Nevin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: discriminative properties of reinforcement schedules. (Vol. 1, pp. 345–364) Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Eckerman, D. A. (1970). Generalization and response mediation of a conditional discrimination. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 301–316.
Fields, L. (1978). Fading and errorless transfer in successive discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 30, 123–128.
Goldstein, H., Angelo, D., & Whetherby, B. (1987). Effects of training method and word order on adults’ acquisition of miniature linguistic systems. The Psychological Record, 37, 89–107
Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185–241.
Kendler, H. H., & Kendler, T. S. (1970). Developmental processes in discrimination learning. Human Development, 13, 65–89.
Lowenkron, B. (1969). Nonoutcome trial behavior: A predictor of solution shift performance and the effects of overtraining. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 484–488.
Lowenkron, B. (1984). Coding responses and the generalization of matching-to-sample in children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 1–18.
Lowenkron, B. (1988). Generalization of delayed identity matching in retarded children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 163–172.
Lowenkron, B. (1989). Instructional control of generalized relational matching to sample in children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 293–309.
Lowenkron, B. (1991). Joint control and the generalization of selection-based verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 9, 121–126.
Lowenkron, B. (1998). Some logical function of joint control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 69, 327–354.
Lowenkron, B. (2004). Meaning: A verbal behavior account. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 20, 77–97.
Lowenkron, B., & Colvin, V. (1992). Joint control and generalized nonidentity matching: Saying when something is not. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 10, 1–10.
Lowenkron, B., & Colvin, V. (1995). Generalized instructional control and the production of broadly applicable relational responding. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 12, 13–29.
Lowenkron, B. & Driessen, E. C. (1971). Solution mode in concept identification problems and magnitude of the overlearning reversal effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 81–87.
Michael, J. (1985). Two kinds of verbal behavior plus a possible third. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 3, 2–5.
Parsons J., Taylor, D. C., & Joyce, T. M. (1981). Precurrent self-prompting operants in children: “Remembering.” Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 253–266.
Sidman, M. (1978). Remarks. Behaviorism, 6, 265–268.
Sidman, M. & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.
Siegal, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonpara-metric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Singh, N. N., & Solmon, R. T. (1990). A stimulus control analysis of the picture-word problem in children who are mentally retarded: The blocking effect. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 525–532.
Skinner, B. F. (1969). Behaviorism at fifty. In B. F. Skinner (Ed.), Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis (pp. 221–242). New York: Appleton-Century-Croft.
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.
Touchette, P. E. (1969). The effects of graduated stimulus change on the acquisition of a simple discrimination. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 39–48.
Urcioli, P. J. (1985) On the role of differential sample behaviors in matching to sample. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 502–519.
Wolff, J. L. (1967). Concept-shift and discrimination-reversal learning in humans. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 369–408.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was conducted under the support of grant HD32123 from NICHD. Portions of this research were reported at the 1992 Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis in San Francisco. Special thanks are due to Vicki Colvin for her extensive help in completing this project.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lowenkron, B. Joint Control and the Selection of Stimuli from Their Description. Analysis Verbal Behav 22, 129–151 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393035
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393035