Abstract
As scientists and practitioners, behavior analysts must make frequent decisions that affect many lives. Scientific principles have been our guide as we work to promote effective action across a broad spectrum of cultural practices. Yet scientific principles alone may not be sufficient to guide our decision making in cases with potentially conflicting outcomes. In such cases, values function as guides to work through ethical conflicts. We will examine two ethical systems, radical behaviorism and functional contextualism, from which to consider the role of values in behavior analysis, and discuss potential concerns. Finally, we propose philosophical pragmatism, focusing on John Dewey’s notions of community and dialogue, as a tradition that can help behavior analysts to integrate talk about values and scientific practices in ethical decision making.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barnes, D., & Roche, B. (1994). Mechanistic ontology and contextualistic epistemology: A contradiction in terms for behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 165–168.
Barnes, D., & Roche, B. (1997). A behavior-analytic approach to behavioral reflexivity. The Psychological Record, 47, 543–572.
Barnes-Holmes, D. (2000). Behavioral pragmatism: No place for reality and truth. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 191–202.
Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2000). Explaining complex behavior: Two perspectives on the concept of generalized operant classes. The Psychological Record, 50, 251–265.
Baum, W. M. (1994). Understanding behaviorism: Science, behavior and culture. New York: HarperCollins.
Day, W. F. (1977). Ethical philosophy and the thought of B. F. Skinner. In S. Leigland (Ed.), Radical behaviorism: Willard Day on psychology and philosophy (pp. 199–208). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Day, W. F., & Moore, J. (1995). On certain relations between contemporary philosophy and radical behaviorism. In J. T. Todd & E. K. Morris (Eds.), Modern perspectives on B. F. Skinner and contemporary behaviorism(pp. 75–84). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and nature. New York: Dover.
Fawcett, S. B. (1991). Some values guiding community research and action. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 621–636.
Fawcett, S. B., Fletcher, R. K., & Mathews, R. M. (1980). Applications of behavior analysis in community education. In D. Glenwick & L. Jason (Eds.), Behavioral community psychology: Progress and prospects (pp. 108–142). New York: Praeger.
Fawcett, S. B., Francisco, V. T., & Schultz, J. A. (2004). Understanding and improving the work of community health and development. In J. Burgos & E. Ribes (Eds.), Theory, basic and applied research, and technological application in behavior science(pp. 209–242). Guadalajara, Mexico: Universidad de Guadalajara.
Glenn, S. S. (1988). Contingencies and meta-contingencies: Toward a synthesis of behavior analysis and cultural materialism. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 161–180.
Hayes, S. C. (1993). Analytic goals and the varieties of scientific contextualism. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, H. W. Reese, & T. R. Sarbin (Eds.), Varieties of scientific contextualism (pp. 11–27). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition New York: Plenum.
Hayes, S. C., & Brownstein, A. J. (1986). Mentalism, behavior-behavior relations and a behavior analytic view of the purposes of science. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 175–190.
Hayes, S. C., Hayes, L. J., & Reese, H. W. (1988). Finding the philosophical core: A review of Stephen C. Pepper’s World Hypotheses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 97–111.
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change.New York: Guilford.
Heldke, L. (1987). John Dewey and Evelyn Fox Keller: A shared epistemological tradition. Hypatia, 2, 129–140.
Jason, L. A., & Glenwick, D. S. (1980). An overview of behavioral community psychology. In D. Glenwick & L. Jason (Eds.), Behavioral community psychology: Progress and prospects (pp. 4–37). New York: Praeger.
Johnson, R. P., & Geller, E. S. (1980). Community mental health center programs. In D. Glenwick & L. Jason (Eds.), Behavioral community psychology: Progress and prospects (pp. 147–174). New York: Praeger.
Lamal, P. A. (1983). A cogent critique of epistemology leaves radical behaviorism unscathed. Behaviorism, 11, 103–109.
Leigland, S. (1993). Discussion of S. C. Hayes: Scientific goals and the context of justification. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, H. W. Reese, & T. R. Sarbin (Eds.), Varieties of scientific contextualism (pp. 28–33). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Leigland, S. (2003). Is a new version of philosophical pragmatism necessary? A reply to Barnes-Holmes. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 297–304.
Longino, H. E. (1989). Can there be a feminist science? In N. Tuana (Ed.), Feminism and science (pp. 44–57). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Longino, H. E., & Doell, R. (1983). Body, bias and behavior. Signs, 9, 206–227.
Machiavelli, N. (1947). The prince (T. G. Bergin, Trans.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (Original work published 1515)
Morris, E. K. (1993). Behavior analysis and mechanism: One is not the other. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 25–43.
Morris, E. K. (1998). Contextualism: The world view of behavior analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 46, 289–323.
Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Potter, E. (1988). Modeling the gender politics in science. Hypatia, 3, 19–34.
Prilleltensky, I. (1997). Values, assumptions, and practices: Assessing the moral implications of psychological discourse and action. American Psychologist, 52, 517–535.
Putnam, H., & Putnam, R. A. (1990). Epistemology as hypothesis. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 26, 407–433.
Roche, B., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2003). Behavior analysis and social constructionism: Some points of contact and departure. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 215–231.
Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. London: Penguin.
Ruiz, M. R. (1995). B. F. Skinner’s radical behaviorism: Historical misconstructions and grounds for feminist reconstructions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 161–179.
Ruiz, M. R. (1998). Personal agency in feminist theory: Evicting the illusive dweller. The Behavior Analyst, 21, 179–192.
Ruiz, M. R. (2001, November). The feminist critique of science and radical behaviorism. Paper presented at the first international meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Venice, Italy.
Schneider, S. M. (1997). Back to our philosophical roots: A journal review of Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. The Behavior Analyst, 20, 17–23.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
Skinner, B. F. (1956). Some issues concerning the control of human behavior. Science, 124. (Reprinted in Cumulative Record, pp. 25–38. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts)
Skinner, B. F. (1961). The design of cultures. Daedalus, 90. (Reprinted in Cumulative Record, pp. 39–50. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts)
Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.
Skinner, B. F. (1990). To know the future. The Behavior Analyst, 13, 103–106.
Skinner, Q. (1996). Machiavelli: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Staddon, J. E. R. (2004). Scientific imperialism and behaviorist epistemology. Behavior and Philosophy, 32, 231–242.
Winter, G. (2001, July 29). Death benefit. New York Times, p. 2.
Zuriff, G. E. (1985). Behaviorism: A conceptual reconstruction. New York: Columbia University Press.
Zuriff, G. (1987). Naturalistic ethics. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), B. F. Skinner: Consensus and controversy (pp. 309–318). London: Falmer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This is an expanded version of a paper presented in a symposium entitledScience and Human Values (M. R. Ruiz, chair) at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, in Boston, 2004. The first author thanks Margaret McLaren of the philosophy department at Rollins College for insights and engaging conversation on John Dewey.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ruiz, M.R., Roche, B. Values and the scientific culture of behavior analysis. BEHAV ANALYST 30, 1–16 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392139
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392139