Abstract
We examined participation by women in journals devoted to social, developmental, cognitive, and general psychology. Authorship and first authorship by women increased from 1978 to 1997 for most journals. Participation by women on the editorial staff did not keep pace with their increased authorship for social and developmental psychology. Based on these trends, women’s participation decreased with increases in the selectivity of the position for social and developmental psychology (a glass ceiling). The development of a glass ceiling suggests that the contributions of men and women are not always treated equally (gender inequity). Because a similar glass ceiling was reported for journals in behavior analysis (McSweeney, Donahoe, & Swindell, 2000; McSweeney & Swindell, 1998), the causes of this inequity appear to be relatively widespread. The failure to find a glass ceiling for general and cognitive psychology suggests that the inequity might be reduced by subtle pressure for diversity in editorial positions and by adopting actions that encourage women to pursue research positions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Buffardi, L. C., & Nichols, J. A. (1981). Citation impact, acceptance rate, and APA journals. American Psychologist, 36, 1453–1456.
Howard, A., Pion, G. M., Gottfredson, G. D., Flattau, P. E., Oskamp, S., Pfafflin, S. M., et al. (1986). The changing face of American psychology: A report from the committee on employment and human resources. American Psychologist, 41, 1311–1327.
Keita, G. P., Houston, S., Wisnieski, L. A., & Cameron, L. (1999). Women in the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: American Psychological Assocation.
McSweeney, F. K., Donahoe, P., & Swindell, S. (2000). Women in applied behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 267–277.
McSweeney, F. K., & Swindell, S. (1998). Women in the experimental analysis of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 21, 193–202.
McSweeney, F. K., & Swindell, S. (2001). The glass ceiling is not fragile: A response to Odum (2000). The Behavior Analyst, 24, 87–93.
Morrison, A. M., & Von Glinow, M. A. (1990). Women and minorities in management. American Psychologist, 45, 200–208.
Neef, N. A. (1993). Response to Myers on participation of women in behavior analysis: Right problem, wrong source. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 357–359.
Odum, A. L. (2000). Reflections on the glass ceiling: Women in the experimental analysis of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 279–283.
Rotton, J., Levitt, M., & Foos, P. (1993). Citation impact, rejection rates, and journal value. American Psychologist, 48, 911–912.
Russo, N. F., Olmedo, E. L., Stapp, J., & Fulcher, R. (1981). Women and minorities in psychology. American Psychologist, 36, 1315–1363.
Teghtsoonian, M. (1974). Distribution by sex of authors and editors of psychological journals, 1970–1972. Are there enough women editors? American Psychologist, 29, 262–269.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McSweeney, F.K., Parks, C.D. Participation by women in developmental, social, cognitive, and general psychology: A context for interpreting trends in behavior analysis. BEHAV ANALYST 25, 37–44 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392043
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392043