Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lernen von Nachhaltigkeit: Exploration und Exploitation als Lernmodi einer vollständig ambidextren Organisation

  • Lernen von Nachhaltigkeit
  • Published:
Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organizations that intend to become more sustainable are challenged to learn in social, ecological and economic dimensions simultaneously. Research so far has not acknowledged that within each of these dimensions (learning areas) the learning processes of exploration and exploitation occur. The paper addresses this research gap and discusses the paradoxical tensions that occur between explorative and exploitative sustainability learning. First, we show how exploration and exploitation can be understood as modes of learning of sustainability und develop a typology of sustainable ambidextrous organizations. Second, we discuss how organizations and their leaders can cope with the paradoxes of learning that occur when organizations learn to be more sustainable.

Zusammenfassung

Organisationen, die nachhaltiger werden wollen, müssen sowohl in der sozialen, ökologischen als auch der ökonomischen Dimension lernen. Bislang wurde in der Forschung nicht beachtet, dass in jeder dieser Dimensionen (Lernfelder) die paradox verbundenen Lernprozesse Exploration und Exploitation möglich sind. Der vorliegende Beitrag setzt an dieser Forschungslücke an und diskutiert paradoxe Spannungen des explorativen und exploitativen nachhaltigkeitsorientierten Lernens. Hierbei wird zunächst aufgezeigt, dass Exploitation und Exploration als Lernmodi des Lernens von Nachhaltigkeit verstanden werden können und eine Typologie ambidextrer nachhaltiger Organisationstypen entwickelt. Anschließend wird diskutiert, wie Organisationen beziehungsweise deren Führungskräfte mit den Lernparadoxien beim Lernen von Nachhaltigkeit umgehen können.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Andriopoulus, Constantine/ Lewis, Marianne L. (2009), Managing Innovative Paradoxes: Ambidexterity Lessons from Leading Product Design Companies, in: Long Range Planning, Vol. 43, S. 104–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andriopoulus, Constantine/ Lewis, Marianne L. (2010), Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation, in: Organization Science, Vol. 20, S. 696–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, Derek/ Marschke, Melissa/ Plummer, Ryan (2008), Adaptive Co-Management and the Paradox of Learning, in: Global Environmental Change, Vol. 18, S. 86–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, Subhabrata B. (2011), Embedding Sustainability Across the Organization: A Critical Perspective, Academy of Learning & Education, Vol. 10, S. 719–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, Deborah/ Kennedy, Monica/ Quazi, Ali (2013), Corporate Social Responsibility and Individual Resistance: Learning as the Missing Link in Implementation, in: Management Learning, Vol. 44, S. 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, Sharon C./ Kim, Rebecca C./ O’Gorman, Kevin D. (2011), Corporate Social Responsibility as a Dynamic Internal Organizational Process: A Case Study, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 101, S. 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calton, Jerry M./ Payne, Steven L. (2003), Coping With Paradox: Multistakeholder Learning Dialogue as a Pluralist Sensemaking Process for Addressing Messy Problems, in: Business & Society, Vol. 42, S. 7–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, Jacqueline (2005), Company Learning about Corporate Social Responsibility, in: Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 14, S. 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick, Thomas/ Hockerts, Kai (2002), Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability, in: Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 11, S. 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Docherty, Peter/ Kira, Mari/ Shani, A.B. Rami (Hrsg.) (2009), Creating Sustainable Work Systems. Developing Social Sustainability, 2. Aufl., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehnert, Ina (2009), Sustainable Human Resource Management: A Conceptual and Exploratory Analysis from a Paradox Perspective, Heidelberg.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, John (1994), Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development, in: California Management Review, Vol. 36, S. 90–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, Tara (2007), Developing Organizational Practices of Ecological Sustainability. A Learning Perspective, in: Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 28, S. 632–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, Cristina B./ Birkinshaw, Julian (2004), The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47, S. 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin Thomas N./ Kennelly, James J./ Krause, Tara-Shelomith (1995), Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, S. 874–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goa, Jijun/ Bansal, Pratima (2013), Instrumental and Integral Logics in Business Sustainability, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 112, S. 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, Tobias/ Figge, Frank (2011), Beyond the Bounded Instrumentality in Current Corporate Sustainability Research: Toward an Inclusive Notion of Profitability, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 104, S. 325–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, Tobias/ Pinske, Jonatan/ Preuss, Lutz/ Figge, Frank (2014), Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: Towards an Integrative Framework, Journal of Business Ethics, online first, DOI: 10.1007ls10551-014-2047-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, Ralf (2010), “Sustainability Learning”: An Introduction to the Concept and Its Motivational Aspects, in: Sustainability, Vol. 9, S. 2873–2897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, Andy/ Fink, Dean (2006), Sustainable Leadership, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugh, Helen M./ Talwar, Alka (2010), How Do Corporations Embed Sustainability Across the Organization, in: Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 9, S. 384–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, Dong/ Jones, Bryn (2012), Why Do Corporate Codes of Conduct Fail? Women Workers and Clothing Supply Chains in Vietnam, in: Global Social Policy, Vol. 12, S. 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, Andrew H. (1999), Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the U.S. Chemical Industry, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, S. 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, Justin/ Van den Bosch, Frans A.J./ Volberda, Henk W. (2006), Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators, in: Management Science, Vol. 52, S. 1661–1674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, Paula/ Le, Jane/ Van de Ven, Andrew (2013), Responding to Competing Strategic Demands: How Organizing, Belonging, and Performing Paradoxes Coevolve, in: Strategic Organization, Vol. 11, S. 245–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein Muel/ Wempe Johan (2001), Sustainability Management. Balancing Conflicting Economic, Environmental and Social Corporate Responsibilities, in: Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Vol. 1, S. 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesselring, Alexander/ Leitner, Michaela (2008), Soziale Innovationen in Unternehmen, ZSI-Zentrum für soziale Innovationen, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozica, Arjan/ Kaiser, Stephan (2012), A Sustainability Perspective on Flexible HRM: How to Integrate Isolated Research on Contingent Work by Applying a Sustainability Framework, in: Management Revue, Vol. 23, Issue 3, S. 239–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, Dovev/ Stettner, Uriel/ Tushman, Michael L. (2010), Exploration and Exploitation within and across Organizations, in: Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 4, S. 109–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Marianne (2000), Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, S. 760–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Marianne W./ Andriopoulos, Costas/ Smith, Wendy (2014), Paradoxical Leadership to Enable Strategic Agility in: California Management Review, Summer Special Issue of Strategic Agility, im Erscheinen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach, Derk/ van Bakel, Janneke C./ Whiteman, Gail/ Rotmans, Jan (2010), Business Strategies for Transition Towards Sustainable Systems, in: Business Strategy and The Environment, Vol. 19, S. 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, Rodrigo (2013), A Holistic Perspective on Corporate Sustainability Drivers, in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, online first, DOI: 10.1002/csr.1325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin Michael H./ Simsek Zeki/ Ling, Yan/ Veiga, John F. (2006), Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to-Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration, in: Journal of Management, Vol. 32, S. 646–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lülfs, Regina (2013), Nachhaltigkeit und organisationales Lernen. Eine transdisziplinäre Analyse. Springer, Wiesbaden.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lüscher, Lotte/ Lewis, Marianne W. (2008), Organizational Change and Managerial Sensemaking: Working Through Paradox, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 51, S. 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, James G. (1991), Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning, in: Organization Science, Vol. 2, S. 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, Joshua, D./ Walsh, James P. (2003), Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives By Business, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 48, S. 268–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariappanadar, Sugumar (2003), Sustainable Human Resource Strategy. The Sustainable and Unsustainable Dilemmas of Retrenchment, in: International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 30, S. 906–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariappanadar, Sugumar (2012), Harm of Efficiency Oriented HRM Practices on Stakeholders: an Ethical Issue for Sustainability, in: Society and Business Review, Vol. 7, S. 168–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W./ Rowan, Brian (1977), Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony, in: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83, S. 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohe, Michael/ Seidl, David (2011), Theorizing the Client-Consultant-Relationship from the Perspective of SocialSystems Theory, in: Organization, Vol. 18, S. 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moldaschl, Manfred E. (Hrsg.) (2007), Verwertung immaterieller Ressourcen. Nachhaltigkeit von Unternehmensführung und Arbeit III, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Christ, Georg (2001), Nachhaltiges Ressourcenmanagement. Eine wirtschaftsökologische Fundierung, Marburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Christ, Georg (2011), Sustainable Management. Coping with the Dilemmas of a Resource-Oriented Management. Berlin Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Martin/ Siebenhüner, Bernd (2007), Policy Instruments for Sustainability-Oriented Organizational Learning, in: Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 16, S. 232–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olbert-Bock, Sibylle/ Ehnert, Ina (2013), Nachhaltigkeit und HRM. Impulse für eine Nachhaltige Unternehmensentwicklung, in: Pekruhl, Ulrich/ Spaar, Regula/ Zölch, Martina (Hrsg.), HRM Jahrbuch 2013, Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly III, Charles/ Tushman, Michael. L. (2004), The ambidextrous organization, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 82, S. 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, Marc/ Schmidt, Frank L./ Rynes, Sara L. (2003), Corporate Social and Financial Performance: a Meta-Analysis, Organization Studies, Vol. 24, S. 403–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puranam, Panish/ Singh, Harbir/ Zollo, Mauritzio (2006), Organizing for Innovation: Managing the Coordination-Autonomy Dilemma in Technology Acquisitions, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 49, S. 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E./ Kramer, Mark R. (2006), Strategy and Society: the Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 84, S. 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey (2010), Building Sustainable Organizations: The Human Factor, Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 2, S. 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raisch, Sebastian/ Birkinshaw, Julian (2008), Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes and Moderators, in: Journal of Management, Vol. 34, S. 375–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raisch, Sebastian/ Birkinshaw, Julian/ Probst, Gilbert/ Tushman, Michael L. (2009), Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation und Exploration for Sustained Performance, in: Organization Science, Vol. 20, S. 685–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, Douglas W.S./ Redman, Tom/ Maguire, Stuart (2013), Green Human Resource Management: A Review and Research Agenda, in: International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 15, S. 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, Marshall S./ van de Ven, Andrew. H. (1989), Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, S. 562–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltzmann, Oliver/ Ionescu-somers, Aileen/ Steger, Ulrich (1995), The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability. in: Literature Review and Research Options, Vol. 23, S. 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebenhüner, Bernd/ Arnold, Marlen/ Hoffmann, Esther/ Behrends, Torsten/ Heerwart, Sebastian/ Beschorner, Thomas (Hrsg.) (2006), Organisationales Lernen und Nachhaltigkeit. Prozesse, Auswirkungen und Einflussfaktoren in sechs Unternehmensfallstudien, Marburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebenhüner, Bernd/ Arnold, Marlen (2007), Organizational Learning to Manage Sustainable Development, in: Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 16, S. 339–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Wendy K. (2014), Dynamic Decision Making: A Model of Senior Leader Managing Strategic Paradoxes, in: Academy of Management Journal, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Wendy K./ Tushman, Michael L. (2005), Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams, in: Organization Science, Vol. 16, S. 522–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Wendy/ Lewis, Marianne W. (2011), Towards a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Organizing, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 36, S. 381–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Wendy K./ Besharov, Marya L./ Wessels, Anke K./ Chertok, M. (2012), A Paradoxical Leadership Model for Social Entrepreneurs: Challenges, Leadership Skills, and Pedagogical Tools for Managing Social and Commercial Demands, in: Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 11, S. 463–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J./ Pisano, Gary/ Shuen, Amy (1997), Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, S. 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, Haridimos/ Hatch, Jo Mary (2001), Complex Thinking, Complex Practice: The Case for a Narrative Approach to Organizational Complexity, in: Human Relations, Vol. 54, S. 979–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED (1987), Our Common Future. World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteman, Gail/ Walker, Brian/ Perego, Paolo (2013), Planetary Boundaries: Ecological Foundations for Corporate Sustainability, in: Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 50, S. 307–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westenholz, nn (1993), Paradoxical Thinking and Change in the Frames of Reference, in: Organization Studies, Vol. 14, S. 37–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Julia (2013), Improving the Sustainable Development of Firms: The Role of Employees, in: Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 22, S. 92–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Donna J. (2010), Measuring Corporate Social Performance: A Review, in: International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 12, S. 50–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fakultät für Wirtschafts- und Organisationswissenschaften, Professur für Personalmanagement und Organisation, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, 85577, Neubiberg, Germany

    Arjan Kozica

  2. Louvain School of Management, Université Catholique de Louvain, Place des Doyens, 1, B-1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgien

    Ina Ehnert

Authors
  1. Arjan Kozica
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ina Ehnert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arjan Kozica.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kozica, A., Ehnert, I. Lernen von Nachhaltigkeit: Exploration und Exploitation als Lernmodi einer vollständig ambidextren Organisation. Schmalenbachs Z betriebswirtsch Forsch 66 (Suppl 68), 147–167 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03373730

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03373730

JEL-Classification

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Search

Navigation