Abstract
Universal screening of emotional and behavioral problems among students warrants further consideration by school professionals. School-based universal screening may provide opportunities for early identification and intervention, ultimately preventing the development of more severe problems and promoting more positive outcomes in the future. The Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (BESS) is a contemporary screening instrument that may be used to identify risk for emotional and behavioral problems in students from preschool to high school. The purpose of the present study was to examine the concurrent validity of the BESS in elementary school settings. Specifically, this study examined the relation between BESS ratings and report-card outcomes (i.e., academic, behavioral, and engagement marks). The results supported the hypotheses that students’ risk-level classifications were significantly related to school-based outcome criterions and that school-based outcome criterions were deemed to be effective discriminators of students’ risk-level classification. Limitations, future directions for research, and implications for practice are discussed herein.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Caldarella, P., Young, E.L., Richardson, M.J., Young, B.J., & Young, K.R. (2008). Validation of the Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders in middle and junior high school. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16, 105–117.
DiStefano, C.A., & Kamphaus, R.W. (2007). Development and validation of a behavioral screener for preschool-age children. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15, 93–102.
Dowdy, E.T., Furlong, M.J., Eklund, K., Saeki, E., & Ritchey, K. (in press). Screening for mental health and wellness: Current school-based practices and emerging possibilities. In B. Doll (Ed.), Handbook of prevention science. Bethesda, MA: National Association of School Psychologists.
Glover, T., & Albers, C. (2007). Considerations for evaluating universal screening assessments. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 117–135.
Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology, Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 38, 581–586.
Kamphaus, R.W., & Reynolds, C.R. (2007). BASC-2 Behavioral and Emotional Screening System Manual. Circle Pines, MN: Pearson.
Kamphaus, R.W., Thorpe, J.S., Winsor, A.P., Kroncke, A.P., Dowdy, E.T., & VanDeventer, M.C. (2007). Development and predictive validity of a teacher screener for child behavioral and emotional problems at school. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 1–15.
Little, M., Murphy, J M., Jellinek, M.S., Bishop, S.J., & Arnett, H.L. (1994). Screening 4- and 5-year-old children for psychosocial dysfunction: A preliminary study with the Pediatric Symptom Checklist. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 15, 191–197.
Reynolds, C.R., & Kamphaus, R.W. (2004). Behavior Assessment System for Children-2. Circle Pines, MN: Pearson
Romer, D., & McIntosh, M. (2005). The roles and perspectives of school mental health professionals in promoting adolescent mental health. In D.L. Evans, E.B. Foa, R.E. Gur, H. Hendin, C.P. O-Brien, M.E.P. Seligman, & B.T. Walsh (Eds.), Treating and preventing adolescent mental health disorders: What we know and what we don’t know (pp. 598–615). New York: Oxford University Press.
Rones, M., Hoagwood, K. (2000). School-based mental health services: A research review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 3, 223–241.
Walker, H.M., & Severson, H.H. (1992). Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders (2nd ed.). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Renshaw, T.L., Eklund, K., Dowdy, E. et al. Examining the Relationship Between Scores on the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System and Student Academic, Behavioral, and Engagement Outcomes: An Investigation of Concurrent Validity in Elementary School. Contemp School Psychol 14, 81–88 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340953
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340953