Abstract
Background and aims: To assess the prevalence and impact of osteoarthritis (OA) and osteoporosis (OP) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among active subjects employed in the public workforce in Belgium. Methods: A cohort of 3440 subjects employed by the Liège City Council was prospectively followed for 6 months. The employees were asked to fill in a monthly log in a health record book, of data regarding their healthcare consumption due to OA and OP. HRQOL was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36). Results: 1811 subjects (52.6%) filled in at least one questionnaire. The mean duration of follow-up was 3.46 months. The self-reported prevalence of OA and OP at entry to the study were respectively 34.1% and 5.3%. 3.6% of subjects reported suffering from both OA and OP. Subjects with OA and both OA and OP had significantly lower scores on all SF-36 dimensions compared with normal subjects, reflecting a worse HRQOL. The OP group had significantly lower mean scores for physical functioning and pain compared with controls. Subjects with both OA and OP had significantly lower values for physical functioning, physical role and pain when compared with the OA and OP groups. Conclusions: The results of this survey of a large sample of active subjects show that self-reported osteoarthritis and osteoporosis are common in the workplace. Both diseases have a major impact on health-related quality of life compared with that of people without self-reported musculoskeletal diseases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Badley EM. The effect of osteoarthritis on disability and health care use in Canada. J Rheumatol 1995; 43 (Suppl): 19–22.
Reginster JY. The prevalence and burden of arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002; 41 (Supp1): 3–6.
Murray CJL, Lopez AD. The global burden of disease. A comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Cambridge (MA): Harvard School of Public Health on behalf of the World Health Organization and The World Bank 1996.
Carr AJ. Beyond disability: measuring the social and personal consequences of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999; 7: 230–8.
Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, Campion ME, O’Fallon WM. Indirect and nonmedical costs among people with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis compared with nonarthritic controls. J Rheumatol 1997; 24: 43–8.
Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 2003; 81: 646–56.
Riggs BL, Melton LJ. The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforted by epidemiology. Bone 1995; 17(5 Suppl): 505S–11S.
Martin AR, Sornay-Rendu E, Chandler JM, Duboeuf F, Girman CJ, Delmas PD. The impact of osteoporosis on quality of life: the OFELY cohort. Bone 2002; 31: 32–6.
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992: 30: 473–83.
Ware JE Jr. The SF-36 Health Survey. In Spilker B, ed. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1996: 337–45.
McHoney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36- item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994; 32: 40–66.
Ravazi D, Gandek B. Testing Dutch and French translations of the SF-36 Health Survey among Belgian angina patients. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 975–81.
Leplege A, Ecosse E, Verdier A, Perneger TV. The French SF-36 Health Survey: translation, cultural adaptation and preliminary psychometric evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 1013–23.
Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D, et al. Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUAL-EFFO). Working Party for Quality of Life of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1999: 10: 150–60.
Lydick E, Zimmerman SI, Yawn B, et al. Development and validation of a discriminative quality of life questionnaire for osteoporosis (the OPTQoL). J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12: 456–63.
Osteoporosis Quality of Life Study Group. Measuring quality of life in women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1997; 7: 478–87.
Hawker G, Melfi C, Paul J, Green R, Bombardier C. Comparison of a generic (SF-36) and a disease specific (WOMAC) instrument in the measurement of outcomes after knee replacement surgery. J Rheumatol 1995; 22: 1193–6.
Lawrence RC, Helmick CG, Arnett FC, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. Arthritis Rheum 1998; 41: 778–99.
Phillipov G, Phillips PJ, Leach G, Taylor AW. Public perceptions and self-reported prevalence of osteoporosis in South Australia. Osteoporos Int 1998; 8: 552–6.
Heliövaara M, Aromaa A, Klaukka T, Knekt P, Joukamaa M, Impivaara O. Reliability and validity of interview data on chronic diseases. The Mini-Finland Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 181–91.
Briggs A, Scott E, Steele K. Impact of osteoarthritis and analgesic treatment on quality of life of an elderly population. Ann Pharmacotherapy 1999; 33: 1154–59.
de Bock GH, Kaptein AA, Touw-Otten F, Mulder JD. Health-related quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis in a family practice setting. Arthritis Care Res 1995; 8: 88–93.
Adachi JD, Ioannidis G, Pickard L, et al. The association between osteoporotic fractures and health-related quality of life as measured by the Health Utilities Index in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporos Int 2003; 14: 895–904.
Picavet HS, Hoeymans N. Health related quality of life in multiple musculoskeletal diseases: SF-36 and EQ-5D in the DMC3 study. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 723–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rabenda, V., Manette, C., Lemmens, R. et al. Prevalence and impact of osteoarthritis and osteoporosis on health-related quality of life among active subjects. Aging Clin Exp Res 19, 55–60 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325211
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325211