Abstract
Streaming for mathematics remains a contentious issue and particular forms of the practice have been considered inequitable. In the study reported here, the focus was on the extent to which streaming is used for mathematics at years 7–10 in Victorian secondary schools. Also of interest were the forms of streaming adopted and the criteria for selection into class groups; and teachers’ views on streaming, their beliefs on whether all students benefit equitably from the practices adopted, and if they modify the curriculum and/or pedagogy in streamed classes. The findings indicated that forms of streaming were fairly widespread, were supported by many mathematics teachers, and were more prevalent as year level increased. Curriculum differentiation and pedagogical change that appeared to support high achievers, but which might limit low achievers’ future mathematics options, were reported. Some teachers recognised some of the limitations associated with streaming, and that particular students might be disadvantaged as a result. The teachers participating in the study did not identify students’ gender, socioeconomic, or ethnic/Indigenous backgrounds as factors of disadvantage linked to streaming. The implications of the findings and recommendations for future research are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Boaler, J., & William, D. (2001). ‘We’ve still got to learn!#x2019;: Students’ perspectives on ability grouping and mathematics achievement. In P. Gates (Ed.),Issues in mathematics teaching (pp. 77–92). London: Routledge Falmer.
Boaler, J., Wiliam, D., & Brown, M. (2000). Students’ experiences of ability grouping—disaffection, polarisation and the construction of failure.British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 631–648.
Burris, C. C., Heubert, J. P., & Levin, H. M. (2006). Accelerating mathematics achievement using heterogeneous grouping.American Educational Research Journal, 43(1), 105–136.
Castelvecchi, D. (2008, Nov.8). The numbers rarely add up for girls: Culture may turn potentially high achievers away from math.Science News, 174, 10.
Chiu, D., Kessinger, R., Beru, Y., Rivera, A., Watley, E., Schmidlein, P., et al. (2008). Influences of math tracking on seventh-grade students’ self-beliefs and social comparisons.The Journal of Educational Research, 102(2), 125–135.
Commonwealth of Australia. (2001).The education of gifted and talented children. Retrieved May 21, 2009, from http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/eet_ctte/completed_inquiries/1999-02/gifted/report/contents.htm
De Vaus, D. A. (2002).Surveys in social research (5th ed.). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
Department of Education and Early Childhood Development [DEECD]. (2007).Summary statistics Victorian schools. Melbourne: Author.
DEECD. (n.d. a).About giftedness. Retrieved October 21, 2008, from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/programs/gifted/default.htm
DEECD. (n.d. b).Learning and teaching. Retrieved October 21, 2008, from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/programs/gifted/learnteach/default.htm
DEECD. (n.d. c).Schooling options. Retrieved October 21, 2008, from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/programs/gifted/schooloptions/default.htm
DEECD. ( n.d. d).Learning & teaching—Grouping for instruction: Whole class. Retrieved October 21, 2008, from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/programs/gifted/learnteach/groupingwhole.htm
Emmett, G. (1983, June). On ability grouping in schools.AdVise, 39, 1–3.
Forgasz, H. J. (2006).Australian year 12 mathematics enrolments: Patterns and trends—past and present. International Centre of Excellence for Education in Mathematics [ICE-EM]. Retrieved February 21, 2008, from http://www.ice-em.org.au/images/stories/FileDownloads/1.pdf
Forgasz, H. (2008). Stars, compass, and GPS: Navigating currents and charting directions for mathematics education research on gender issues. In M. Goos, R. Brown, & K. Makar (Eds.),Navigating currents and charting directions: Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 5–15). Adelaide: MERGA.
Gillard, J. (2008). Delivering Australia’s first national curriculum (Media release). Retrieved May 20, 2009, from http://www.deewr.gov.au/Ministers/Gillard/Media/Releases/Pages/Article_081107_114135.aspx
Hallam, S., & Ireson, J. (2003). Secondary school teachers’ attitudes towards and beliefs about ability grouping.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 343–356.
Hanushek, E. A., & Wößmann, L. (2005).Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. Working Paper 11124, National Bureau of Economic Research [NBER] working paper series. Retrieved May 21, 2009, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w11124
Hattie, J. A. C. (2002). Classroom composition and peer effects.International Journal of Educational Research, 37(5), 449–481.
Ireson, J., & Hallam, S. (1999). Raising standards: Is ability grouping the answer?Oxford Review of Education, 25(3), 343–358.
Ireson, J., Hallam, S., Hack, S., Clark, H., & Plewis, I. (2002). Ability grouping in English secondary school: Effects on attainment in English, mathematics, and science.Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 8(3), 299–318.
Ireson, J., Hallam, S., Mortimore, P., Hack, S., Clark, H., & Plewis, I. (1999, September).Ability grouping in the secondary school: The effects on academic achievement and pupils’ self-esteem. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Sussex, Brighton.
Lamb, S., Hogan D., & Johnson T. (2001). The stratification of learning opportunities and achievement in Tasmanian secondary schools.Australian Journal of Education, 45(2), 153–167
Leder, G. (2008). High achievers in mathematics: What can we learn from and about them? In M. Goos, R. Brown, & K. Makar (Eds.),Navigating currents and charting directions: Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 323–330). Adelaide: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia [MERGA].
Leder, G. C., Forgasz, H. J., Taylor, P. (2006). Mathematics, gender, and large scale data: New directions or more of the same? In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehliková (Eds.),Mathematics at the centre. Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 33–40). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.
Leder, G. G., Fullarton, S., & Taylor, P. (1994). Mathematically gifted students: Challenging the stereotype.Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 8(2), 13–19.
Li, Q. (1999). Teachers’ beliefs and gender differences in mathematics: A review.Educational Research, 41(1), 63–76.
Linchevski, L., & Kutscher, B. (1998). Tell me with whom you’re learning, and I’ll tell you how much you’ve learned: Mixed-ability versus same-ability grouping in mathematics.Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 29(5), 533–554.
Mathematical Association of Victoria [MAV]. (n.d.). Qualifications guidelines review. Retrieved May 23, 2009, from http://www.mav.vic.edu.au/assinfo/policy/deetresponse1201.htm
NAPLAN. (2008).National assessment program. Literacy and numeracy. Retrieved January 3, 2008, from http://www.naplan.edu.au/verve/_resources/2ndStageNationalReport_18Dec_v2.pdf
National Curriculum Board. (2008).National mathematics curriculum: Framing paper. Retrieved May 23, 2009, from http://www.ncb.org.au/verve/_resources/National_Mathematics_Curriculum_Framing_ Paper.pdf
National Curriculum Board. (2009a).Shape of the Australian curriculum: Mathematics. Retrieved May 23, 2009, from http://www.ncb.org.au/verve/_resources/Australian_Curriculum_-_Maths.pdf
National Curriculum Board. (2009b).Framing paper consultation report: Mathematics. Retrieved May 23, 2009, from http://www.ncb.org.au/verve/_resources/Consultation_report_-_maths.pdf
Reisman, F. K., & Kauffman, S. H. (1980).Teaching mathematics to children with special needs. Columbus, Ohio: C. E. Merrill Publishing Company.
Schinck, A. C., Neale, H. W., Jr., Pugalee, D. K., & Cifarclli, V. V. (2008). Using metaphors to unpack student beliefs about mathematics.School Science and Mathematics, 108(7), 326–333.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998).Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Teese, R., Davies, M., Charlton, M., & Polesel, J. (1995).Who wins at school? Boys and girls in Australian secondary education. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service..
Thomson, S., & De Bortoli, L. (2008).Exploring scientific literacy: How Australia measures up. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Thomson, S., Wernert, N., Underwood, C., & Nicholas, M. (2008).TIMSS 07: Taking a closer look at mathematics and science in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Tiedemann, J. (2002). Teachers’ gender stereotypes as determinants of teacher perceptions in elementary school mathematics.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50, 49–62.
Topsfield, J. (2008, Jan. 16). Teacher shortage a tough lesson for Rudd and Labor.The Age [online]. Retrieved May 23, 2009 from http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2008/01/15/1200159449769.html
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority [VCAA]. (2005).Mathematics. Victorian Certificate of Education study design. Melbourne: Author. Retrieved May 9, 2009 from http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies/mathematics/mathsstd.pdf
Zevenbergen, R. (2003). Grouping by ability. A self-fulfilling prophecy.Australian Mathematics Teacher, 59(4), 2–7.
Zevenbergen, R. (2005). The construction of a mathematical habitus: Implications of ability grouping in the middle years.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5), 607–619.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forgasz, H. Streaming for mathematics in years 7–10 in Victoria: An issue of equity?. Math Ed Res J 22, 57–90 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217559
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217559