Abstract
Teachers beliefs about their ability to affect students’ performance is an important part of professionalism. This study compared 725 Hong Kong and 575 Shanghai primary in-service teachers on their teacher efficacy. Two Chinese versions of the 12-item Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale were used in this study since some wordings of the Hong Kong version of the Scale (HK-TSE) were different from the Shanghai version (STSE) as a result of cultural differences. Basically, the Shanghai teachers reported significantly higher efficacy than did the Hong Kong teachers. After reviewing these quantitative results, 86 follow-up questionnaires from Shanghai in-service teachers who also participated in the first part of this study were collected. Results of this qualitative part showed that the three most commonly cited factors for the contribution of teacher efficacy were: respect and confidence placed in them by students and parents, the training they received from universities and the experience they gained from daily teaching practice. Though Hong Kong in-service teachers had lower efficacy scores than the Shanghai counterparts.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Berman, P., McLaughlin, M., Bass, G., Pauly, E., & Zellman, G. (1997).Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change: Vol. VII. Factors Affecting Implementation and Continuation (Report No. R-1589/7-HEW). Santa Monica, CA: RAND. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 140 432)
Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, Y. (2005). Qualitative study in special education.Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207.
Bray, M., & Koo, D. Y. R. (2004). Introduction. In M. Bray & R. Koo (Eds.),Education and Society in Hong Kong and Macao: Comparative Perspectives on Continuity and Change (2nd ed.). Hong Kong: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (1994).Quantitative Data Analysis: With SPSS for Windows. NY: Routledge.
Chan, D. W. (2002). Stress, self-efficacy, social support, and psychological distress among prospective Chinese teachers in Hong Kong.Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 5, 557–569.
Chapman, D. W., Chen, X., & Postiglione, G. A. (2000). Is preservice teacher training worth the money? A study of teachers in ethnic minority regions of the People’s Republic of China.Comparative Education Reviews, 44(3), 300–328.
Cheung, H. Y. (2006). The measurement of teacher efficacy: Hong Kong primary inservice teachers.Journal of Education for Teaching, 32(4), 435–451.
Ding, G. (2001). The integration of pre-service and in-service teacher education: The cases of Shanghai and Jiangsu.Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education and Development, 4(2), 61–72.
Dooley, K. (2001). Re-envisioning teacher preparation: Lessons from China.Journal of Education for Teaching, 27(3), 241–251.
Earley, P. C. (1994). Self or group? Effects of training on self-efficacy and performance.Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 89–117.
Earley, P. C., Gibson, C. B., & Chen, C. C. (1999). How did I do? versus How did we do? Cultural contasts of performance feedback use and self-efficacy.Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 30(5), 594–619.
Ebmeier, H. (2003). How supervision influences teacher efficacy and commitment: An investigation of a path model.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18(2), 110–141.
Emmer, E., & Hickman, J. (1991). Teacher efficacy in classroom management and discipline.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 755–765.
Education Department. (1998).Shanghai Educational Yearbook: Shanghai Municipal Education Commission. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation.Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569–582.
Guo, S. (2005). Exploring current issues in teacher education in China.The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 51(1), 69–84.
Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions.American Educational Research Journal, 31, 627–643.
Hampton, N. Z. (2000). Self-efficacy and quality of life in people with spinal cord injuries in China.Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 43(2), 66–74.
Ho, I. T., & Hau, K. T. (2004). Australian and Chinese teacher efficacy: Similarities and differences in personal instruction, discipline, guidance efficacy and beliefs in external determinants.Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 313–323.
Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and the organizational helath of schools.The Elementary School Journal, 93, 356–372.
Huang, X., & Huang, C. (2003). A survey on teacher efficacy sense.Journal of Foshan University, 21(4), 88–91.
Hui, S. K. F., & Cheung, H. Y. (2004). How does learning happen for people participating in adventure training?Asia Pacific Education Review, 5(1), 76–87
Imants, J. G. M., & De Brabander, C. J. (1996). Teachers’ and principals’ sense of efficacy in elementary schools.Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(2), 179–195.
Karsten, S., Cogan, J. J., Grossman, D. L., Liu, M. H., & Pitiyanuwat, S. (2002). Citizenship education and the preparation of future teachers: A study.Asia Pacific Education Review, 3(2), 168–183.
Kennedy, K. J., & Hui, S. K.F. (2006). Developing teacher leaders to facilitate Hong Kong curriculum reforms: Self efficacy as a measure of teacher growth.International Journal of Education Reform, 15(1), 137–151.
Kim, Y. I., & Corn, A. (1998). The effects of teaches’ characteristics on placement recommendations for students with visual impairments.Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 92(7), 491–502.
Lau, S. (1996).Growing up the Chinese way. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
Li, D. (1999). Modernization and teacher education in China.Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 179–192.
Li, H., & Rao, N. (2000). Parental influences on Chinese literacy development: A comparison of preschoolers in Beijing, Hong Kong, and Singapore.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24(1), 82–90.
Lin, H. L., Gorrell, J., & Taylor, J. (2002). Influence of culture and education on US and Taiwan preservice teachers’ efficacy beliefs.Journal of Educational Research, 96(1), 1–16.
Lin, Q., & Xun, Y. (2001). The institutional and policy development of teacher education in China.Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education and Development, 4(2), 5–23.
Mak, G. C. L. (1998). Politics of curriculum: Changes in teacher education in China.Educational Journal, 26(2), 245–360.
Mertler, C.A. (2004). Secondary teachers’ assessment literacy: Does classroom experience make a difference?American Secondary Education, 33(1), 49–64.
Mills, M., Martino, W., & Lingard, B. (2004). Attracting, recruiting and retaining male teachers: Policy issues in the male teacher debate.British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(3), 355–369.
Pang, I. W., & Watkins, D. (2000). Towards a psychological model of teacher-parent communication in Hong Kong primary schools.Educational Studies, 26(2), 141–163.
Rizvi, M., & Elliot, B. (2005). Teachers’ perceptions of their professionalism in government primary schools in Karachi, Pakistin.Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), 35–52.
Shaughnessy, M. F. (2004). An interview with Anita Woolfolk: The educational psychology of teacher efficacy.Educational Psychology Review, 16(2), 153–176.
Shum, L. C., & Cheng, Y. C. (1997). Perceptions of women principals’ leadership and teachers’ work attitudes.Journal of Educational Administration, 35(2), 165–184.
Tong, Y. H., & Song, S. G. (2004). A study on general self-efficacy and subjective wellbeing of low SES college students in a Chinese University.College Student Journal, 38, 637.
Trentham, L. (1995). Teacher efficacy and teacher competency ratings.Psychology in the Schools, 22(3), 343–352.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct.Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805.
Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure.Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248.
Wheatley, D. F. (2002). The potential benefits of teacher efficacy doubts for educational reform.Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 5–22.
Wiliamn, D. (2003). Validity: All you need in assessment.School Science Review, 85 (311), 79–81.
Wilkins, J., & Gamble, R. J. (2000). An examination of gender differences amongst teachers in Jamaican schools.Multicultural Education, 7(4), 18–20.
Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers’ sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing students.Teaching and Teacher Education, 6, 137–148.
Wu, G., & Huang, G. (2002). Summary on self-efficacy and teaching efficacy.Journal of Baoding Teachers College, (3), 74–77.
Yeung, K. W., & Watkins, D. (2000). Hong Kong student teachers’ personal construction of teaching efficacy.Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 20(2), 213–235.
Xie, A. (2001). The development and reform of teacher education in China: Theoretical issues.Asia Pacific of Teacher Education and Development, 4(2), 41–59.
Zhou, J., & Reed, L. (2005). Chinese government documents on teacher education since the 1980s.Journal of Education for Teaching, 31(3), 201–213.
Zhu, X., & Liu, C. (2004). Teacher training for moral education in China.Journal of Moral Education, 33(4), 481–494.
Zhu, X., & Zhu, J. (2001). Reform in China’s secondary teacher education.Asia Pacific of Teacher Education and Development, 4(2), 25–40.
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2002). The concept of action learning.Learning Organization, 9(3), 114–124.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheung, H.Y. Teacher efficacy: A comparative study of Hong Kong and Shanghai Primary in-service teachers. Aust. Educ. Res. 35, 103–123 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216877
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216877