Abstract
In many countries there remain substantial sex differences in enrolments in elective science courses, despite concerted efforts in recent years to alleviate them. This paper explores the reasons for these differences by comparing models of male and female enrolment intentions in elective courses in biology, chemistry and physics. The models are based on responses from approximately 450 students from 5 Australian high schools.
First, a theoretical model, the Science Enrolment Model, was derived from Eccles and colleagues’ General Model of Academic Choice. Students’ responses were then used to develop empirical models of enrolment intentions in the three elective courses. Analyses for the models were conducted using the LISREL “mean structures” extension. Sex differences in the dependent variables in the models were then attributed to the relevant sets of independent variables.
Substantial sex differences were identified in measures of perceived career value, interest and performance expectations in all three models which explained between 70% and 82% of the sex differences in enrolment intentions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barnes, G. R. (1999)A Motivational Model of Enrolment Intentions in Senior Secondary Science Courses in New South Wales (Australia) Schools, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Sydney Macarthur, Australia.
Barnett, J.E., C. A. Sink & J. E. Hixon (1993) Perceptions of scholastic competence and their relation to middle school achievement. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA, April 12–16, 1993.ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 358 141.
Bradley, J. (1981) Predicting specialisation in science, in A. Kelly, ed.,The Missing Half: Girls and Science Education, Manchester University, Press Manchester.
Cameron, R. (1989) Why boys and girls do (or don’t) choose science,The Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, vol. 35, pp. 111–112.
Clark, M. (1986) Predictors of scientific majors for black and white college students,Adolescence, vol. 21, pp. 205–213.
Collings, J., & A. Smithers (1983) Psychological profiles of physical and biological science choosers,Research in Science and Technological Education, vol. 1, pp. 5–15.
Collings, J., & A. Smithers (1984) Person orientation and science choice,European Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 6, pp. 56–65.
Crawley, F.E. & A. S. Coe (1990) Determinants of middle school intentions to enroll in a high school science course: An application of the theory of reasoned action,Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 26, pp. 461–476.
Deboer, G.E. (1984) A study of gender effects in the science and mathematics course-taking behavior of groups of students who graduated from college in the late 1970s,Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 21, pp. 95–103.
DeBoer, G.E. (1987) Predicting continued participation in college chemistry for men and women,Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 24, pp. 527–538.
Deeter, T.E. (1989) Development of a model of achievement behavior for physical activity,Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, vol. 11, pp. 13–25.
Deeter, T.E. (1990) Re-modeling expectancy and value in physical activity,Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, vol. 12, pp. 86–91.
Dumenci, L. (1995) Construct validity of the Self-Directed Search using hierarchically nested structural models,Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 47, pp. 21–34.
Eccles (Parsons), J.S. (1984) Sex differences in mathematics participation, in M. Steinkamp & M. Maehr, eds.,Advances in Motivation and Achievement: Women in Science, vol. 2, pp. 93–137, JAI Press Inc, Greenwich, CT.
Eccles (Parsons), J., T. F. Adler, R. Futterman, S. B. Goff, C. M. Kaczala, J. L. Meece & C. Midgely (1983) Expectancies, values and academic behaviors, in J.T. Spence, ed.,Achievement and Achievement Motivation, pp.75–146, Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
Eccles (Parsons), J., T. Adler & J. L. Meece (1984) Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternate theories,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol 46, pp. 26–43.
Etherington, C.A. (1991) A test of a model of achievement behaviors,American Educational Research Journal, vol. 28, pp. 155–172.
Gardner, P.L. & P. Tamir (1989) Interest in biology. Part II: Relationship with the enrollment intentions of Israeli senior high school biology students,Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 26, pp. 425–433.
Harding, J., G. Hilderbrand & S. Kleinen (1988) Recent international concerns in gender and science/technology,Educational Review, vol 40, pp. 185–193.
Holland, J.L. (1985)Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments, Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Johnson, S. & J. B. Bell (1987) Gender differences in science: Option choices,School Science Review, vol. 69, pp. 268–276.
Joreskog, K.G. & D. Sorbom (1988) LISREL 7:A Guide to the Program and Applications, SPSS Chicago.
Kelly, A. (1988) Option choice for girls and boys,Research in Science and Technological Education, vol. 6, pp. 5–23.
Khoury, G.A. & B. E. Voss (1985) Factors influencing high school students’ science enrolment patterns: Parental influences and attitudes towards science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. (58th, French Lick Springs, IN, April 15–18, 1985)ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 254 408.
Meece, J.L., J. S, Parsons, C. Kaczala, S. B. Goff & R. Futterman (1982) Sex differences in math achievement: Toward a model of academic choice,Psychological Bulletin, vol. 91, pp. 324–348.
National Board of Employment, Education and Training (1994)Science and Technology Education: Foundation for the Future, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory.
National Science and Technology Analysis Group (y)Science and Technology in Australia: A Review of Government Support, National Science and Technology Group, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory.
Saville, P. & S. Blinkhorn (1976)Undergraduate Personality by Factored Scales, NFER, Windsor.
Sheffey, M.A., R. P. Bingham & W. B. Walsh (1986) Concurrent validity of Holland’s theory for college-educated black men,Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, vol. 14, pp. 149–56.
Simpson, R.D. & J. S. Oliver (1990) A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students,Science Education, vol. 74, pp. 1–18.
Tamir, P. (1988) Gender differences in high school science in Israel,British Educational Research Journal, vol 14, pp. 127–140.
Toews, W. (1988) Why take physics in high school — Why plan to teach physics,The Physics Teacher, vol. 26, pp. 458–460.
Weinburgh, M. (1995) Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A metaanalysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991,Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 32, pp. 387–98.
Weiner, B. (1974)Achievement Motivation and Attribution Theory, General Learning Press, Morriston, NJ.
Weiner, B. (1984) Principles for a theory of student motivation and their application within an attributional framework, in R. Ames and C. Ames, eds.,Research on Motivation in Education Vol. I: Student Motivation, pp.1–11, Academic Press Inc, San Diego, California.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barnes, G., McInerney, D.M. & Marsh, H.W. Exploring sex differences in science enrolment intentions: An application of the General Model of Academic Choice. Aust. Educ. Res. 32, 1–23 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216817
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216817