Abstract
Larvae of two Indian strains ofAnopheles stephensi were highly susceptible to chlorpyrifos, temephos, dichlorvos, fenitrothion, fenthion and malathion but not to carbamates, DDT and Γ-HCH. Both strains upon continuous and intense larval selection under laboratory conditions, developed high level of resistance to malathion and moderate levels to fenitrothion, fenthion, and temephos. However, selection with propoxur did not produce resistance in both strains. Larval selection could not induce any tolerance in adults. In general, selection with op-compounds induced cross-tolerance to other op-compounds, organochlorines and carbamates. Malathion-selection caused high cross resistance to fenitrothion while, fenitrothion selection produced high cross-resistance to malathion.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ariaratnam V and Georghiou G P 1971 Selection for resistance to carbamates and organophosphorus insecticides inAnopheles albimanus;Nature (London) 232 642–644
Ayad H and Georghiou G P 1979 Resistance pattern ofAnopheles albimanus Wied following selection by parathion;Mosq. News 39 121–125
Bhombore S R, Roy R G and Samson F 1963 Susceptibility status ofAnopheles stephensi to DDT and dieldrin in some towns of Madras State;Bull. Natl. soc. Indian Malar and other mosq. borne diseases 11 35–38
Finney D J 1971Statistical methods in biological assay 2nd edn (London: Griffin Press)
Georghiou G P 1972 Studies on resistance to carbamates and organophosphorus insecticides inAnopheles alhimanus;Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.21 797–806
Georghiou G P, Ariaratnam V and Breeland S G 1972 Development of resistance to organophosphorus and carbamate compounds inAnopheles albimanus in nature;Bull. W.H.O. 35 185
Georghiou G P, Breeland S G and Ariaratnam V 1973 Seasonal escalation of organophosphorus and carbamate resistance inAnopheles albimanus by agricultural sprays;Environ. Entomol 2 369–374
Georghiou G P and Caiman J R 1969 Results of fenitrothin selection ofCulex pipiens fatigans Wied andAnopheles albimanus Wied;Bull. W.H.O. 40 97–101
Georghiou G P, Lin C S, Apperson C S and Pasternaak M E 1974 Recalcitrance ofCulex tarsalis Coquillett to selection pressure by propoxur (Dipt. culicidae);Mosq. News 34 325
Georghiou G P, Metcalf R L and Gidden F E 1966 Carbamate resistance in mosquitoes. Selection ofCulex pipiens fatigans for resistance to Baygon;Bull. W.H.O. 35 691–708
Herath P R J and Davidson G 1981a Multiple-resistance inAnopheles culicifacies Giles;Mosq. News 41 325–327
Hearth P R J and Davidson G 1981b Studies on the nature of malathion-resistance in a population ofAnopheles stephensi from Southern Iran;Mosq. News 41 531–534
Herath P R J and Davidson G 1981c Multiple-resistance inAnopheles albimanus;Mosq. News. 41 535–539
Herath P R J and Davidson G 1981d The nature of malathion-resistance in a population ofAnopheles Culicifacies Giles;Bull. W.H.O. 59 383–386
Herath P R J, Miles S J and Davidson G 1981 Fenitrothion (OMS43) resistance in the taxonAnopheles Culicifacies Giles;J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 84 87–88
Manouchehri A V, Djanbaksh B and Rouhant F 1976 Studies on the resistance ofAnopheles stephensi to malathion in Bandar Abbas, Iran:Mosq. News 36 320–322
Manouchehri A V, Shalli A K, Al-saadi S H and Al-okaily A K 1980 Status of resistance to anopheline mosquitoes in Iraq;Mosq. News 40 535–540
Manouchehri A V, Zaini A and Yazdanpanah Y 1975 Selection for resistance to malathion inAnopheles stephensi mysorensis;Mosq. News 38 278–279
Rajagopal R 1977 Malathion-resistance inAnopheles culicifacies in the field;Indian. J. Med. Res. 7 27–28
Rajagopalan N, Vedamanickam J C and Ramoo H C 1956 A preliminary note on the development of resistance to DDT by larvae ofAnopheles stephensi type in Erode urban South India;Bull. Natl. Soc. Indian Malar and other mosquito borne diseases 4 126–128
Ramsdale C D, Herath P R J and Davidson G 1980 Recent developments of insecticides-resistance in some Turkish anophelines;J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 83 11–19
Ranasinghe’epa L B and Georghiou G P 1976 An attempt to isolate organophosphorus resistance mechanisms in Culexpipiens quinquefasciatus by use of synergists inProc. and papers of the 44th annual conf. Calif mos. control. Assoc. Inc., 2
Rao V S and Sitaraman N L 1964 DDT-resistance inAnopheles stephensi in some parts of Andhra Pradesh. India;Bull. nat. soc. malaria and other comm. Dis. 1 127–133
Rathor H R and Toquir G 1980 Malathion-resistance inAnopheles stephensi Liston in Lahore, Pakistan;Mosq. News 40 526–531
Rathor H R, Toquir G and Reisen W K 1980 Status of insectcides-resistance in anopheline mosquitoes of Punjab province, Pakistan;Southeast. Asian. J. Trop. Med. Publ. Hlth. 11 332–340
Roy R G and coauthors 1978 Susceptibility ofAnopheles stephensi from urban areas in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka to some commonly used insecticides;Indian J. Med. Res. 67 947–952
Tadano T and Brown A W A 1966 Development of resistance to various insecticides inCulex pipiens fatigans Wiedemann;Bull W.H.O. 35 185–201
Thomas V 1970 Susceptibility ofCulex pipiens fatigans to insecticides in Malayasia;Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Publ. Hlth. 1 93–98
World Health Organization Technical Report Series No. 655 1980Resistance of vectors of diseases to Pesticides. Fifth report of the W.H.O. expert committee on vector biology and control 82 pp.
World Health Organization 1981a Instructions for determining the susceptibility or resistance of mosquito larvae to insecticides (unpublished document)WHO/VBC/81.807 7pp.
World Health Organization 1981b Instructions for determining the susceptibility or resistance of adult mosquitoes to organochlorine, organophosphate and carbamate insecticides. Establishment of the base-line (unpublished document)WHO/VBC/81.805 7 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chitra, S., Pillai, M.K.K. Development of organophosphorus and carbamate-resistance in Indian strains ofAnopheles Stephensi Liston. Proc Ani Sci 93, 159–170 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03186277
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03186277