Abstract
This review focused on the written and visual representation of the moon in 80 children’s books, including Caldecott Medal and Honor books over the past 20 years. Results revealed that many of these books misrepresent the moon and even reinforce misconceptions about lunar phases. Teachers who use children’s literature that misrepresents the moon may unwittingly promote or reinforce alternative conceptions. Thus, teachers, parents, and library media specialists should be aware of common misconceptions about the moon appearing in children’s literature. Such misconceptions may cause students to develop misunderstandings about scientific concepts. Examples of errors in children’s literature are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Images of nature of science in middle grade science trade books.The New Advocate, 15, 121–127.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2002).Sky 4: The moon. Retrieved November 22, 2006, from www.sciencenetlinks.com/lessons. cfm?BenchmarkID=4&DocID=172.
Asch, F. (1993).Moonbear. New York: Little Simon.
Ault, C. R. (1984). Intelligently wrong: Some comments on children’s misconceptions.Science and Children, 21, 22–24.
Barlow, D. (1991). Children, books, and biology.Bioscience, 41, 166–168.
Baxter, J. (1989). Children’s understanding of familiar astronomical events.International Journal of Science Education, 11, 502–513.
Bisard, W., Aron, R. H., Francek, M. A., & Nelson, B. D. (1994). Assessing selected physical science and earth science misconceptions of middle school through university preservice teachers.Journal of College Science Teaching, 24, 38–42.
Brown, D. (1998).One giant leap: The story of Neil Armstrong. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Burns, J. (1997). From the rainbow crow to polar bears: Introducing science concepts through children’s literature.Science Scope, 21, 14–16.
Butzow, C., & Butzow, J. (1988). Facts from fiction.Science & Children, 25, 27–29.
Butzow, C., & Butzow, J. (1990). Science through children’s literature: An integrated approach.Science Activities, 27, 29–38.
Callison, P., & Wright, E. (1993, April).The effect of teaching strategies using models on preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions about earth-sun-moon relationships. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA.
Carle, E. (1986).Papa, please get the moon for me. Singapore: Simon & Schuster Books for Young Readers.
Carratello, J. (1992).Across the curriculum with favorite authors: Eric Carle. Westminster, CA: Teacher Created Materials.
Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996).Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Cohen, M. (1982, February).How can sunlight hit the moon if we are in the dark?: Teachers’ concepts of phases of the moon. Paper presented at the Seventh Annual Henry Lester Smith Conference on Education Research, Bloomington, IN.
Crook, P., & Lehman, B. (1990). On track with trade books.Science & Children, 27, 22–23.
Dai, M., & Capie, W. (1990, April).Misconceptions held by the preservice teachers in Taiwan. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, AC.
Daisey, P. (1994). The value of trade books in secondary science and mathematics instruction: A rationale.School Science and Mathematics, 94, 130–137.
Dowd, F. (1990). Geography is children’s literature, math, science art and a whole world of activities.Journal of Georgraphy, 89, 68–73.
Eggerton, S. (1996). Balancing science and sentiment: The portrayal of nature and the environment in children’s literature.Science & Children, 33, 20–23.
Ford, D. J. (2001, March).What constitutes a good science trade book?: Reviewing the reviewers’ choices. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
Freeman, E. (1995). Surprises: Children’s books.Reading Teacher, 49, 150–158.
Ghazi, S. H. (1996).Ramadan. New York: Holiday House.
Hewson, M., & Hewson, P. (1983). Effect of instruction using students’ prior knowledge and conceptual change strategies on science learning.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 731–743.
Jordan, A. (1997). It’s alivel: Science books.Teaching and Learning Literature with Children and Young Adults, 6, 14–25.
Kazemek, F., Louisell, R., & Wellik, J. (2004, April).Children’s stories about their natural worlds: An exploration from multiple perspectives (and an invitation to participate). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Krupp, E. C., & Krupp, R. R. (1993).The moon and you. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
Kuethe, J. (1963). Science concepts: A study of “sophisticated” errors.Science Education, 47, 361–364.
Kumar, D., & Voldrich, J. (1994). Situated cognition in second grade science: Literature books for authentic contexts.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 6(2), 1–10.
Madrazo, G. (1997). Using trade books to teach and learn science.Science & Children, 34, 20–21.
Mayer, D. (1995). How can we best use literature in teaching?Science & Children, 32, 16–19.
McDermott, L. (1996).Physics by inquiry. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Moser, S. (1994). Using storybooks to teach science themes.Reading Horizons, 35, 138–150.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996).National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
A private universe [Videotape]. (1988). Project Director: M. H. Schneps, Pyramid Film and Video.
Reading & science: Successful interdisciplinary connections. (2003).Science & Children, 40.
Rice, D., & Rainsford, A. (1996, April).Using children’s trade books to teach science: Boon or boondoggle? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
Roberts, D. (1999). The sky’s the limit.Science & Children, 37, 33–37.
Royce, C., & Wiley, D. (1996). Children’s literature and the teaching of science: Possibilities and cautions.Clearing House, 70, 18–20.
Sadler, P. (1987).Misconceptions in astronomy. Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Schoon, K. (1992). Students’ alternative conceptions of earth and space.Journal of Geological Education, 40, 209–214.
Schoon, K. (1995). The origin and extent of alternative conceptions in the earth and space sciences: A survey of pre-service elementary teachers.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 7(2), 27–46.
Sis, P. (1996).Starry messenger. New York: Farrar, Strauss Giroux.
Smardo, F. (1982). Using children’s literature to clarify science concepts in early childhood programs.The Reading Teacher, 36, 267–273.
Spudis, P. D. (1996).The once and future moon. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute Press.
Stahly, L., Krockover, G., & Shepardson, D. (1999). Third grade students’ ideas about lunar phases.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 159–177.
Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K., & Christopher, J. E. (2002). Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of moon phases before and after instruction.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 633–658.
Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K., & Christopher, J. E. (2004, January).Eighth grade students’ conceptions of standards-based lunar concepts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Nashville, TN.
Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K., & Christopher, J. E. (2002). Preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge of observable moon phases and pattern of change in phases.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(2), 87–101.
Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K., & Christopher, J. E. (in press a). Fourth grade elementary students’ conceptions of standards-based lunar concepts.International Journal of Science Education.
Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K., & Christopher, J. E. (in press b). A longitudinal study of conceptual change: Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of moon phases.Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
Zeilik, M., Schau, C., & Mattern, N. (1999). Conceptual astronomy: Replicating conceptual gains, probing attitude changes across three semesters.American Journal of Physics, 67, 923–927.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trundle, K.C., Troland, T.H. & Pritchard, T.G. Representations of the moon in children’s literature: An analysis of written and visual text. J Elem Sci Edu 20, 17–28 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174700
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174700