Abstract
The aim of this study was to verify whether children from low socio-economic status (SES) are victims of stereotype threat. Children in first grade (6 to 7 years old) and third grade (8 to 9 years old) performed Raven’s progressive matrices, an intellectual ability test commonly used by psychologists. The test was presented either with the (evaluative) instructions recommended by Raven et al. (1998) or with non evaluative instructions. Children’s SES and beliefs concerning differences of abilities at school as a function of SES were also assessed. The results indicated that, as early as first grade, participants believed that children from high SES are better at school than children from low SES. Furthermore, low SES participants’ performance on the Raven’s matrices was lower in the evaluative condition than in the non evaluative condition. The experimental instructions did not affect high SES participants’ performance. The discussion explores implications of these results in the use of standardized tests to assess the intellectual abilities of low SES children.
Résumé
Cette étude a pour but de vérifier si des enfants issues de milieux défavorisés sont susceptibles d’être victimes de la menace du stéréotype dès l’école primaire. La performance d’élèves de CP (âgés de 6 à 7 ans) et de CE2 (âgés de 8 à 9 ans) à un test d’intelligence fréquemment utilisé par les psychologues, les matrices de Raven, a été mesurée. Le test a été présenté soit avec les consignes évaluatives standard préconisées par les concepteurs du test, soit avec des consignes non évaluatives. Le niveau socio-économique des enfants était évalué ainsi que leur croyance en l’existence d’une différence d’aptitudes scolaires en fonction du niveau socio-économique. Les résultats montrent que, dès le CP, les élèves croient en la supériorité scolaire des enfants favorisés par rapport aux enfants défavorisés. De plus, la performance de ces derniers aux matrices de Raven était plus faible en condition évaluative qu’en condition non-évaluative. La performance des élèves de haut statut socio-économique n’était pas modifiée par le type de consignes utilisées. Les implications de ces résultats pour l’évaluation et l’orientation d’enfants de bas statut socio-économique à l’aide de tests standardisés supposés insensibles aux effets de culture seront discutées.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aboud, F.E. (1988).Children and prejudice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Ambady, N., Shih, M., Kim, A., & Pittinsky, T.L. (2001). Stereotype susceptibility in children: Effects of identity activation on quantitative performance.Psychological Science, 12, 385–390.
Aronson, J., Lustina, M., Keough, K., Brown, J.L., & Steele, C.M. (1999). When white men can’t do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 29–46.
Ben-Zeev, T., Fein, S., & Inzlicht M. (2005). Arousal and stereotype threat.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 174–181.
Berjot, S., & Drozda-Senkowska, E. (2007). How students from different socio-economic status perceive themselves? Study of the SES stereotype content.European Review of Applied Psychology, 57, 119–132.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.C. (1964).Les héritiers [The heirs]: Paris: Editions de Minuit.
Brown, R.P., & Day, E.A. (2006). The difference isn’t Black and White Stereotype threat and the race gap on Raven’s Advanced Progressives MatricesJournal of Applied Psychology, 91, 979–985.
Brown, R.P., & Pinel, E.C. (2003). Stigma on my mind: Individual differences in the experience of stereotype threat.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 736–747.
Burkley, M., & Blanton, H. (2008). Endorsing a negative in-group stereotype as a self-protective strategy: Sacrificing the group to save the self.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 37–49.
Carpenter, P.A., Just, M.A., & Snell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices test.Psychological Review, 97, 404–431.
Cozarelli, C., Wilkinson, A.V., & Tagler, M.J. (2001). Attitudes toward the poor and attributions for poverty.Journal of Social Issues, 57, 207–227.
Croizet, J.-C., & Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 588–594.
Croizet, J.C., Désert, M., Dutrevis, M., & Leyens, J.-Ph. (2001). Stereotype threat, social class, gender and academic under-achievement: When our reputation catches up to us and takes over.Social Psychology of Education, 4, 295–310.
Croizet, J.C., Désert, M., Dutrevis, M., & Leyens, J.-Ph. (2003). L’impact des réputations d’infériorité sur les performances intellectuelles [The impact of reputations of inferiority on intellectual performance].Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 16, 97–124.
Désert, M., Croizet, J.-C., & Leyens, J.-Ph. (2002). La menace du stéréotype: Une interaction entre situation et identité [Stereotype threat: An interaction between situation and identity].L’Année Psychologique, 102, 555–576.
Guimond, S., & Roussel, L. (2001). Bragging about one’s school grades: Gender stereotyping and students’ perception of their abilities in science, mathematics and language.Social Psychology of Education, 4, 275–293.
Harrison, L.A., Stevens, C.M., Monty, A.N., & Coakley, C.A. (2006). The consequences of stereotype threat on the academic performance of White and non-White lower income college students.Social Psychology of Education, 9, 341–357.
Herrnstein, R.J., & Murray, C. (1994).The Bell Curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.
Humphreys, L.G. (1984). General intelligence. In C.R. Reynolds & R.T. Brown (Eds.),Perspectives on bias in mental testing (pp. 221–247). New York: Plenum Press.
Hunt, E., & Carlson, J. (2007). Considerations relating to the study of group differences in intelligence.Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 194–213.
Jensen, A.R. (1998).The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport CT: Praeger.
Katz, I. (1964). Review of evidence relating to effects of desegregation on the intellectual performance of Negroes.American-Psychologist, 19, 381–399.
Leyens, J.-Ph., Désert, M., Croizet, J.C., & Darcis, C. (2000). Stereotype threat: Are lower status and history of stigmatization preconditions of stereotype threat.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1189–1199.
Lott, B. (2002). Cognitive and behavioral distancing from the poor.American Psychologist, 57, 100–110.
Martinot, D., & Désert, M. (2007). Awareness of a gender stereotype personal beliefs and self-perceptions regarding math ability: When boys do not surpass girls.Social Psychology of Education, 10, 455–471.
Mayer, D.M., & Hanges, P.J. (2003). Understanding the stereotype threat effect with “culture free” tests: An examination of its mediator and measurement.Human Performance, 16, 207–230.
McKown, C., & Weinstein, R.S. (2003). The development and consequences of stereotype consciousness in middle childhood.Child Development, 74, 498–515.
Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T.J., Boykin, W.A., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., Halpern, D. F., Loehlin, J.C., Perloff, R., Sternberg, R.J., & Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: Knows and unknows.American Psychologist, 51, 77–101.
Ostrove, J.M., & Cole, E.R. (2003). Privileging class: Toward a critical psychology of social class in the context of education.Journal of Social Issues, 59, 677–692.
Raven, J.C., Raven, J., & Court, J.H. (1998).A manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. London: H. K. Lewis.
Régner, I., Huguet, P., & Monteil, J.-M. (2002). Effects of socioeconomic status information on cognitive ability inferences: When low-SES students make use of a self-threatening stereotype.Social Psychology of Education, 5, 253–269.
Sackett, P.R., Hardison, C.M., & Cullen, M.J. (2004). On interpreting stereotype threat as accounting for African American — White differences on cognitive tests.American Psychologist, 59, 7–13.
Spencer, B., & Castano, E. (2007). Social class is dead. Long live social class! Stereotype threat among low socioeconomic status individuals.Social Justice Research, 20, 418–432.
Steele, C.M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance.American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.
Steele, C.M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.
Steele, C.M., Spencer, S.J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. Zanna (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 34, pp. 379–440). New York: Academic Press.
Sternberg, R.J., & Grigorenko, E.L. (2007). The difficulty of escaping preconceptions in writing an article about the difficulty of escaping preconceptions: Commentary on Hunt and Carlson (2007).Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 221–223.
Stone, J. (2002). Battling the doubt by avoiding practice: The effects of stereotype threat on self-handicapping in white athletes.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1667–1678.
White, K.R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement.Psychological Bulletin, 91 461–481.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J.S., Yoon, K.S., Harold, R.D., Abreton, A., Freedman-Doan, K., et al. (1997). Change in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A three-year study.Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 451–469.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Désert, M., Préaux, M. & Jund, R. So young and already victims of stereotype threat: Socio-economic status and performance of 6 to 9 years old children on Raven’s progressive matrices. Eur J Psychol Educ 24, 207–218 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173012
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173012