Abstract
We characterized changes in stream morphology and riparian vegetation cover at eight field sites in tributary basins of the upper Arkansas River, Colorado, USA. Three of these sites have experienced flow augmentation, while five others are responding to natural flow conditions. Data analyzed for the eight field sites included hydrologic data from U.S. Geological Survey gaging stations, extensive field surveys of riparian vegetation and channel and floodplain morphology, and land-cover maps compiled from historic aerial photographs of field sites. Hydrologic analyses indicated that augmented peak annual floods in the Lake Creek basin are more than double those of Clear Creek or Cottonwood Creek, similar tributaries where flow augmentation does not occur. Likewise, augmented peak floods on Lake Fork are roughly double those of a similar tributary basin with a natural flow regime. Flow duration curves from these basins also indicated that flows of a given magnitude are sustained over longer periods of time in the Lake Creek and Lake Fork basins than in comparable basins lacking flow augmentation. Historic changes in the channel pattern at augmented sites indicated a shift from highly sinuous meandering channels to less sinuous or braided channels. Data from field sites also indicated that along augmented reaches, bankfull channel width and widthdepth ratios are greater than in comparable sections that lack flow augmentation. Similarly, substrate size on depositional bars at augmented sites is substantially coarser than on streams without flow augmentation. Median particle size for the three sites along augmented reaches ranges from 38 to 56 mm. By contrast, sites where natural flows occur have median particle sizes between 15 and 26 mm. Historic aerial photograph analysis indicated that over the last 56 years, loss of riparian vegetation cover at sites where flow augmentation occurs was greater than that at sites where natural flows occur. Bottomland areas immediately adjacent to the active channel have experienced up to a 10% decrease in riparian vegetation cover at sites affected by augmented flows. These losses primarily occur along channel margins, with commensurate increases in exposed depositional bars and active channel features. By contrast, along reaches where natural flows occur, riparian vegetation cover generally shows a net increase or decrease of less than 2% of the bottomland area. Substantial change in channel and floodplain morphology suggests that augmented streams in the upper Arkansas River basin are continuing to adjust their shape and channel dimensions to achieve a new equilibrium. The complex response of mountain streams to flow augmentation over a relatively short geologic time period makes the prediction of future long-term conditions difficult. Restoration planners working in this or similar watersheds must recognize the historic and potential future impacts of flow augmentation when evaluating sites for restoration efforts.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Literature Cited
Abbott, P. O. 1976. Observed channel changes in a mountain stream due to increased flow from transbasin imports. Proceedings of the Third Federal Inter-agency Sedimentation Conference. Denver, CO, USA.
Andrews, E. D. 1986. Persistence in the size distribution of surficial bed material during an extreme snowmelt flood. Water Resources Research 2:191–197.
Baker, V. R. 1977. Stream channel response to floods with examples from central Texas. Geological Society of America Bulletin 86: 975–978.
Bradley, C. and D. G. Smith. 1984. Meandering channel response to altered flow regime: Milk River, Alherta and Montana. Water Resources Research 20:1913–1920.
Bray, D. I. And R. Kellerhals. 1979. Some Canadian examples of the response of rivers to man-made changes. p. 351–372.In D. D. Rhodes and G. P. Williams (eds.) Adjustments of the Fluvial System. Kendall Hunt Publishing Co. Binghamton, NY, USA.
Church, M. 1995. Geomorphic response to river regulation: case studies and time-scaies. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 11:3–22.
Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetland and deepwater habitats of the United States. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washingtion, DC, USA, Biological Report 79(31).
Cross, F. B. and R. E. Moss. 1987. Historic changes in fish communities and aquatic habitats in plains streams of Kansas. p. 155–165.In W. J. Matthews and D. C. Heins (eds.) Community and Evolutionary Ecology of North American Stream Fishes. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK, USA.
Crouch, T. M., D. Cain, P. O. Abbott, R. D. Penley, and T. R. Hurr. 1984. Water resources appraisal of the upper Arkansas River basin from Leadville to Puchlo, Colorado. U. S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 82-4114.
Dominick, D. S. 1997. Effects of flow augmentation on stream channel morphology and riparian vegetation: upper Arkansas River basin, Colorado. M.S. Thesis. Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.
Friedman, J. M., W. R. Osterkamp, and W. M. Lewis. 1996. Channel narrowing and vegetation development following a Great Plains flood. Ecology 77:2167–2181.
Friedman, J. M., M. L. Scott, and G. T. Auble. 1997. Water management and cottonwood forest dynamics along prairie streams. p. 49–71.In F. L. Knopf and F. B. Samson (eds.) Ecology and Conservation of Great Plains Vertebrates. Springer-Verlag Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Friedman, J. M., W. R. Osterkamp, M. L. Scott, and G. T. Auble. 1998. Regional pattern in response of riparian forest to water management in the Great Plains. Wetlands 18:619–633.
Gregory, S. V., F. J. Swanson, W. A. McKee, and K. W. Cummins. 1991. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. BioScience 4: 540–551.
Gupta, A. and H. Fox. 1974. Effects of high-magnitude floods on channel form: a case study in Maryland piedmont. Water Resources Research 10:499–509.
Harris, R. R., C. A. Fox, and R. Risser. 1987. Impacts of hydroelectric development on riparian vegetation in the Sierra Nevada Region. California, USA. Environmental Management 11:519–527.
Henszey, R. J., Q. D. Skinner, and T. A. Wesche. 1991. Response of montane meadow vegetation after two years of streamflow augmentation. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 6:29–38.
Hupp, C. R. 1988. Plant ecological aspects of flood geomorphology and paleoflood history. p. 335–356.In V. Baker, R. Kochel, and P. Patton (eds.) Flood Geomorphology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.
Hupp, C. R. and W. R. Osterkamp. 1985. Bottomland vegetation distribution along Passage Creek, Virginia, in relation to fluvial landforms. Ecology 66:670–681.
Johnson, W. C. 1992. Dams and riparian forests: case study from the upper Missouri River. Rivers 3:229–242.
Johnson, W. C. 1994. Woodland expansion in the Platte River, Nebraska: patterns and causes. Ecological Monographs 64:45–84.
Johnson, W. C. 1998. Adjustment or riparian vegetation to river regulation in the Great Plains U.S.A. Wetlands 18:608–618.
Karnuta, T. 1995. Road and riverside geology of the Upper Arkansas Valley: Arkansas headwaters recreation area. Chaffee Press Inc., Salida, CO. USA.
Kellerhals, R., M. Church, and L. B. Davies. 1979. Morphological effects of interbasin river diversions. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 6:18–31.
McBride, J. R. and J. Strahan. 1981. Fluvial processes and woodland succession along Dry Creek, Sonoma County, California, California Riparian Systems Conference, September 17–19. University of California, Davis. CA. USA.
O’Neill, M. P., J. C. Schmidt, J. P. Dobrowolski, C. P. Hawkins, and C. M. U. Neale. 1997. Identifying sites for riparian wetland restoration: application of a model to the upper Arkansas River basin. Restoration Ecology 5:85–102.
Resh, V. H., A. V. Brown, A. P. Covich, M. E. Gurtz, H. W. Li, G. W. Minshall, S. R. Reice, A. L. Sheldon, J. B. Wallace, and R. C. Wissmer. 1988. The role of disturbance in stream ecology. Journal of North American Benthological Society 7:433–455.
Ryan, S. E. 1994. Effects of transbasin diversion on flow regime, bed load transport, and channel morphology in Colorado mountain streams. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Schmidt, J. C. and J. B. Graf. 1990. Aggradation and degradation of alluvial sand deposits. 1965 to 1986, Colorado River, Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1493.
Schumm, S. A. 1969. River metamorphosis. American Society of Civil Engineers. Journal of Hydraulics Division. HY1:255–273.
Scott, M. L., M. A. Wondzell, and G. T. Auble. 1993. Hydrograph characteristics relevant to the establishment and growth of western riparian vegetation. p. 237–246.In H. J. Morel-Seytoux (ed.) Proceedings of the 13th Annual American Geophysical Union Hydrology Days. Hydrology Days Publications, Atherton, CA, USA.
Smith, S. D., A. B. Wellington, J. L. Nachlinger, and C. A. Fox. 1991. Functional responses of riparian vegetation to streamflow diversion in the eastern Sierra Nevada. Ecological Applications 1: 89–97.
Stromberg, J. C. and D. T. Patten. 1990. Riparian vegetation instream flow requirements: a case study from a diverted stream in the eastern Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Environmental Management 14:185–194.
Stromberg, J. C. and D. T. Patten. 1992. Response ofSalix lasiolepis to augmented stream flows in the upper Owens River. Madrono 39:224–235.
Stromberg, J. C. 1993. Instream flow models for mixed deciduous riparian vegetation within a semiarid region. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 8:225–235.
Swanson, F. J. 1980. Geomorphology and ecosystems. p. 159–170.In R. W. Waring (ed.) Forests: Fresh Perspectives from Ecosystem Analysis, Proceedings of the 40th Annual Biology Colloquium. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Viessman, W., J. W. Knapp, G. L. Lewis, and T. E. Harbaugh. 1977. Introduction to Hydrology. Harper and Row Publishers, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Williams, G. P. and M. G. Wolman. 1984. Downstream effects of dams on alluvial rivers. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1286.
Wolman, M. G. 1954. A method of sampling coarse river-bed materials. Transactions American Geophysical Union 35:951–956.
Wolman, M. G. and R. Gerson. 1978. Relative scales of time and effectiveness of climate in watershed geomorphology. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 3:189–208.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dominick, D.S., O’Neill, M.P. Effects of flow augmentation on stream channel morphology and riparian vegetation: Upper Arkansas River basin, Colorado. Wetlands 18, 591–607 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161675
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161675