Abstract
THIS PAPER describes the three-year evolution of an online Economics I course, reports on student outcomes and evaluations, and discusses the lessons learned. Results show that, as the course evolved from an instructor-led to a student-centered learning pedagogical model, several indicators of completing students' learning and satisfaction with the course increased. At the same time, however, withdrawal rates also increased significantly—perhaps revealing students' discomfort with the increased effort required in taking responsibility for one's learning. The authors concluded that, in the end, the Clipper Project had actually provided the catalyst for exploring best practices for teaching in any medium rather than simply providing an opportunity to experiment with online teaching and learning.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Agarwal, R., & Day, A.E. (1998). The impact of the Internet on economic education.Journal of Economic Education, 29(2), 99–110.
Carr, S. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students.Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(23), A39-A41.
Christoper, M.M., Thomas, J.A., & Tallent-Runnels, M.K. (2004). Raising the bar: Encouraging high level thinking in online discussion forums.Roper Review, 26(3), 166–171.
Coates, D., & Humphreys, B.R. (2001). Evaluation of computer-assisted instruction in principles of economics.Educational Technology & Society, 4(2), 133–144.
Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Collis, B., Winnips, K., & Moonen, J. (2000). Structured support versus learner choice via the World Wide Web (WWW): Where is the payoff?Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(2), 163–196.
Cuban, L. (1986).Teaches and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College.
Cuban, L. (2001).Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving.Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 58, 19–36.
Fauske, J., & Wade, S.E. (2004). Research to practice online: Conditions that foster democracy, community, and critical thinking in computer-mediated discussions.Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(2), 137–153.
Garrison, D.R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough.The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148.
Garrison, D.R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. (2004). Student role adjustment in online communities of inquiry: Model and instrument validation [Electronic version].Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2), 61–74.
Gilbert, P.K., & Dabbagh, N. (2005). How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: A case study.British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 5–18.
Hewitt, J. (2003). How habitual online practices affect the development of asynchronous discussion threads.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28(1), 31–45.
Hill, J.R., Han, S., & Raven, A. (2001). Build it and they will stay: A researchbased model for creating community in Web-based learning environments (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED470090).
Johnson, D., Burnett, M., & Rolling, P. (2002). Comparison of Internet and traditional classroom instruction in a consumer economics course.Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 20(2), 20–28.
Kearsley, G. (2000).Online education: Learning and teaching in cyberspace. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Knowlton, D.S. (2000). A theoretical framework for the online classroom: A defense and delineation of a student-centered pedagogy.New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 84(5–14).
Koszalka, T.A., & Ganesan, R. (2004). Designing online courses: A taxonomy to guide strategic use of features available in course managment systems (CMS) in distance education.Distance Education, 25(2), 243–256.
Lockee, B. (2001). What matters in judging distance teaching? Not how much it's like a classroom course.The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved February 21, 2001, from http://chronicle.com/.
Navarro, P. (2000). Economics in the cyberclassroom.The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(2), 119–132.
O'Connor, C., Sceiford, E., Wang, G.W., Foucar-Szocki, D., & Griffin, O. (2003).Departure, abandonment, and dropout of e-learning: Dilemma and solutions. Report sponsored in part by the MASIE Center with funds provided by the e-Learning Consortium. from http://www.masie.com/researchgrants/2003/JMU_Final_Report.pdf
Palloff, R.M., & Pratt, K. (1999).Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education.Change, 31(3), 12–17.
Saettler, L.P. (1990).The evolution of American educational technology. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Slagter van Tryon, P.J., & Bishop, M.J. (in press). Identifying “e-mmediacy” strategies for Web-based instruction: A delphi study.Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(3).
Twigg, C.A. (2003). Quality, cost and access: The case for redesign. In M.S. Pittinsky (Ed.),The wired tower: Perspectives on the impact of the Internet on higher education (111–143). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Vachris, M.A. (1999). Teaching principles of economics without “chalk and talk.” The experience of CNU Online.Journal of Economic Education, 3, 292–303.
Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study.Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 77–90.
Wu, D., & Hiltz, S.R. (2004). Predicting learning from asynchronous on-line discussions.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2), 139–152.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ABOUT THE AUTHORS M.J. (Mary Jean) Bishop is an Assistant Professor of Educational Technology in Lehigh's College of Education. Her research interests include understanding the fundamental components and the psychology behind instructional media and delivery systems in order to devise more effective ways to enhance instruction. In 2001, Dr. Bishop received the Young Scholar Award by the ECT Foundation of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT) for “Theoretical Foundations for Sound's Use in Multimedia Instruction to Enhance Learning.”
Tom Hyclak is Chair of the Economics Department and Interim Dean for the College of Business and Economics. His research interests include labor studies, urban and regional economics and macroeconomics
Sherri Yerk-Zwickl is the Instructional Technology Team Leader at Lehigh University. She has a Master's degree in Educational Technology and an undergraduate degree in Business and Information Technology. She served as Dr. Hyclak's instructional technology consultant for the Clipper Economics I course project.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bishop, M.J., Hyclak, T. & Yerk-Zwickl, S. The clipper project: Lessons learned teaching an online economics course. J. Comput. High. Educ. 18, 99–120 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033415
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033415