Abstract
This paper compares how educational reform documents in Korea and the U.S.A. conceptualize teachers and teacher education and examines how, if at all, the discourses of one country appear to influence those of the other. Special attention is paid to the ways in which reform documents incorporate different conceptions of professionalism in framing and in proposing remedies for the problems with teachers and teacher education. Eighteen reform documents issued in the two countries by national governmental and non-governmental organizations since the 1980s were selected and analyzed. It was found that while both Korean and American documents seem to draw on elements of the functionalist (or trait theory) conception of professionalism, Korean documents put more emphasis on issues related to the power/autonomy of teachers. Regarding cross-country influence, Korea seems to have appropriated ideas and moved toward the structures and practices evidenced in the U.S.A. during an earlier period.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abbott, A. (1988).The system of professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Adams, D., & Gottlieb, E. E. (1993).Education and social change in Korea, New York, NY: Garland Publishing, Inc.
American Federation of Teachers(AFT). (2000).Building a profession: Strengthening teacher preparation and induction. Washington: New York: Author.
Apple, M. W. (1995).Education and power (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Arnove, R. F. (1980). Comparative education and world-system analysis.Comparative Education Review, 24(1), 48–62.
Aronowitz, S. (1973).False promise: The shaping of American working class consciousness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Becker, H. (1962). The nature of a profession. InEducation for the Professions [61st Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II] (pp. 27–46). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bidwell, C., & Kazamias, A. M. (1962). Religion, politics, and popular education: An historical comparison of England and America. Comparative Education Review, 97–110.
Braverman, H. (1974).Labor and monopoly capitalism: The degradation of work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Bullough, R. V. Jr., Burbank, M., Gess-Newsom, J., Kauchak, D., & Kennedy, C. (1998). What matters most: Teaching for America’s future?Journal of Education for Teaching, 24(1), 7–32.
Burbules, N., & Torres, C. (Eds.). (2000).Globalization and education: Critical perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
Carlson, D. (1987). Teachers as political actors: From reproductive theory to the crisis in schooling.Harvard Educational Review, 57, 283–307.
Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy. (1986).A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century: Author.
Chase, B. (1997).Teacher unionism: Bob Chase defends his views. Rethinking Schools Online, 11(4). Retrived March 1, 2005, from http://rethinkingschools.org/ archive/11_04/chasltr.shtml
Clayton, T. (1998). Beyond mystification: Reconnecting world-system theory for comparative education.Comparative Education Review, 42(4), 479–496.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, M. K. (2002). The discourse of reform in teacher education: Extending the dialogue.Educational researcher, 31(6), 26–28.
Connell, R. (1995). Transformative labour: Theorizing the politics of teachers’ work. In M. Ginsburg (Ed.),The Politics of educators’ work and lives (pp. 91–114). New York: Garland.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1990). Teacher professionalism: Why and how? In A. Lieberman (Ed.),Schools as collaborative cultures: Creating the future now (pp. 25- 50). New York: The Falmer Press.
Davies, S., & Guppy, N. (1997). Globalization and educational reform in anglo-American democracies.Comparative Education Review, 41(4), 435–459.
Delandshere, G., & Petrosky, A. (2004). Political rationales and ideological stances of the standards-based reform of teacher education in the US.Teaching & Teacher Education, 20, 1–15.
Densmore, K. (1987). Professionalism, proletarianization and teacher work. In T. S. Popkewitz (Ed.),Critical studies in teacher education (pp. 130–160). Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press.
Derber, C. (1982).Professionals as workers: Mental labor in advanced capitalism. Boston: G. K. Hall.
Dibona, J. (1986). Profession at risk: Teaching and the labor process.Education Foundations, 1, 91–105.
Diesing, P. (1991).How does social science work? Reflection on practice. Pittsburgh, PA: The University of Pittsburgh Press.
Edwards, R. (1979). Three faces from the hidden abode. In R. Edwards (Ed.)Contested terrain: The transformation of the workplace in the Twentieth Century (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Basic Books.
Eggleston, J. (1986). Teacher professionalism and professinalization. In S. Ranson & J. Tomlison (Eds.),The changing government of education (pp. 113–23). London: Allen and Unwin.
Engvall, R. (1997).The professionalization of teaching: Is it really much ado about nothing. Lanham: University Press of America.
Esland, G. (1980). Professions and professionalism. In G. Esland & Salaman (Eds.), The politics of work and occupation (pp. 213-250). University of Toronto: The Open University Press.
Esteve, J. M. (2000). The transformation of the teachers’ role at the end of the twentieth century: New challenges for the future.Educational Review, 52(2), 197–217.
Etzioni, A. (1969).The semi-professions and their organization. New York: Free Press.
Filson, G. (1988). Ontario teachers’ deprofessionalization and proletarianization.Comparative Education Review, 32(3), 298–317
Friedson, E. (1970).Professional dominance. Chicago: Aldine.
Gaffield, C. (1994). Children’s lives and academic achievement in Canada and the United States.Comparative Education Review, 38(1), 36–64.
Gallagher, K. S., & Bailey, J. D. (2000). The politics of teacher education reform: Strategic philanthropy and public policy making.Educational Policy, 14(1), 11–24.
Ginsberg, R., & Plank, N. D. (Eds.). (1995).Commissions, reports, reforms, and educational policy. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Ginsburg, M. (Ed.). (1991).Understanding educational reform in global context: Economy, ideology, and the state. New York: Garland Publishing, INC.
Ginsburg, M. (1997). Professionalism or politics as a model for educators’ work and lives.Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 133–146.
Ginsburg, M., Wallace, G., & Miller, H. (1988). Teachers, economy, and the State: An English Example.Teaching & Teacher Education, 4 (4), 317–337.
Gore, J., & Morrison, K. (2001). The perpetuation of a (semi-) profession: Challenges in the governance of teacher education.Teaching & Teacher Education, 17, 567–582.
Gottlieb, E. E., & Cornbleth, C. (1989). The professionalization of tomorrow’s teachers: An analysis of US teacher education reform rhetoric.Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(1), 3–12.
Gyarmati, G. (1975). The doctrine of professions: Basis of a power structure.International Social Science Journal, 27 (4), 38–52.
Hall, C., & Schultz, R. (2003). Tensions in teaching and teacher education: Professionalism and pofessionalisation in England and Canada.Compare, 33 (3), 369–383.
Halmos (Ed.). (1973).Professionalization and social change (Sociological Review Monograph No. 20). Keele, England: University of Keele.
Hantrais, L., & Mangen, S. (1996). Method and management of cross-national social research. InCross-national research methods in the social science (pp. 1–12). New York: Pinter.
Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning.Teachers and Teaching, 6(2), 151–182.
Harris, K. (1982).Teachers and classes: A Marxist analysis. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Holmes Group. (1986).Tomorrow’s teachers. East Lansing, MI: Author.
Holmes Group. (1990).Tomorrow’s schools: Principles for the design of professional development schools. East Lansing, Mich: The Holmes Group Inc.
Holmes Group. (1995).Tomorrow’s school of education. East Lansing, MI: Author.
Hoyle, E. (1982). The professionalization of teachers: A paradox.British Journal of Educational Studies, 30 (2), 161–171.
Jarausch, K. (1990).The unfree professions: German lawyers, teachers and engineers. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Inkeles, A., & Sirowy, L. (1984).Convergent and divergent trends in national educational systems. In G. Lenski (Ed.), (pp. 137–165). Leiden, Netherlands: E.J. Brill.
Johnson, T. (1972).Professions and power. London: Macmillan.
Johnson, T. (1980). Work and power. In G. Salaman (Ed.),The politics of work and occupations. Milton Keynes: The Open University Press.
Kim, E., & Han, Y. (2002).Attracting, developing, and retaining effective teachers: Background report for Korea. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.
Kim, J.-Y. (1998).Kyoyukch o ngchihakch o g kwanch o mes o bon kyosa yangs o ng chejae [Teacher education system analyzed by educational politics’ viewpoint].The Politics of Education, 5 (1), 22–41.
Koo, J. (2002).Hankukkyowon kwa kyowonchongchaek [Educators in Korea and teacher policy]. Seoul, Korea: Hawoo.
Korean Federation of Teachers’ Association. (2004).President message. Retrieved December 9, 2004, from http://english.kfta.or.kr/message.asp
Korean Teachers’ and Educational Workers’ Union. (1990).Hanguk kyoyuk undong bakseo 1978-1990 [A report on Korean education movement 1978-1990]. Seoul: Pulbit.
Korean Teachers’ and Educational Workers’ Union. (2002).Che16dae taetongryeongs o ng o Ch o nkyojo kyoyuk kongyak yokuan [KTU’s educational policy proposal for the 16th Presidential Election].Chonkyojo shinmun, 4–5.
Kwag, P.-S. (2001).Kyosilkyoyuk u i kaehyokkwa kyosa u i su o b ch o nmuns o ng [Classroom teaching reform and teachers’ instructional professionalism].Hankuk Kyosa Kyoyuk, 18 (1), 5–13.
Kwag, Y.-U. (1998).Kyoyukkyaehyokkwa sab o mtaehagui palch o nkwaje [Educational reform and developing schools of education],Hankuk Kyosa Kyoyuk, 15(1), 88–108.
Labaree, D. (1992). Power, knowledge, and the rationalization of teaching: A genealogy of the movement to professionalize teaching.Harvard Educational Review, 62(2), 123–154.
Labaree, D. F. (1995). A disabling vision: Rhetoric and reality in tomorrow’s school of education.Teachers College Record, 97(2), 167–205.
Larson, M. S. (1977).The rise of professionalism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Larson, M. (1980). Proletarianization of educated labor.Theory and Society, 9(1), 134–75.
Laudner, H. & Yee, B. (1987). Are teachers being proletarianized? In S. Walker & L. Barton (Eds.),Gender, class and education (pp. 58–71). Sussex, England: Falmer Press.
Lee, C-J. (2003). Kongkyoyuk chongsanghwa gwajewa panghyang [Directions and tasks for returning Korean public education to its original purpose].Korean Educational Research Society, 73–101.
Lee, J-G., Adams, D. & Cornbleth, C. (1988). Transnational transfer of curriculum knowledge: A Korean case study.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(3), 233–246.
Lieberman, M. (1956).Education as a profession. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lortie. D. (1975).School teacher: A sociology study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McLaughlin, M. (1997). Rebuilding teacher professionalism in the United States. In A. Hargreaves & R. Evans (Eds.),Buying teachers back. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
Metzger, W. (1987). A spectra haunting American scholars: The spectra of professionalism.Educational Researcher, 16 (6), 10–19.
Mills, C. W. (1951).White collar. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ministry of Education and Human Resource Development (MOEHRD). (2001).Kyojikpaljeon Jonghapbangan [Comprehensive plan for developing the teaching profession]. Seoul, Korea: Author.
Morrow, R. A., & Torres, C. A. (2000). The state, globalization, and educational policy. In C. A. Torres & N. C. Burbules (Eds.),Globalization and education: Critical perspectives (pp. 27–56). New York, NY: Routledge.
National Commission on Excellence in Education(NCEE). (1983).A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
National Commission on Teaching & America’s Future (NCTAF). (1996).What matters most: Teaching for America’s future. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110.
Oppenheimer, M. (1973). Proletarianization of the professional. In P. Halmos (Ed.),Professionalization and social change (pp. 213–27). Keele, England: University of Keele.
Ozga, J., & Lawn, M. (1981).Teachers, professionalism, and class: A study of organized teachers. London: Falmer Press.
Park, Y-S. (2001, Feburary).New trend in the policy for elevating professionalism of the Korean teachers. Paper presented at the International Forum on Education Reform in the Asia-Pacific Region, Hong Kong.
Parsons, T. (1954). The professions and social structure. InEssays in Sociological Theory (pp. 34–49). New York: Free Press.
Peterson, P. E. (1973). The politics of educational reform in England and the United States.Comparative Education Review, 17(2), 160–179.
Pickle, J. (1990). Toward a reconstruction of teacher professionalism.Educational Foundations, 4(2), 73–87.
Popkewitz, T. S., & Pereya, M. (1993). An eight country study of reform practices in teacher education: An outline of the problematic. In T. Popkewitz (Ed.),Changing patterns of power: Social regulation and teacher education reform (pp. 14–52). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Presidential Advisory Commission on Educational Policy. (1992).Kyoyukpalchon ui kibonkusang [Basic framework for educational development]. Seoul: Author
Presidential Commission on Education Reform. (1987).Kyoyuk kyaehy o g chonghab kusang [Comprehensive plan for education reform]. Seoul: Author.
Presidential Commission for Educational Reform. (1995).Segyehwa wa chongpohwa ul ikunun shinkyoyuk cheje [Education reform for a new education system leading toward a globalization and information era]. Seoul: Author.
Presidential Commission for New Education Community (PCNEC). (2000).21 segi hankukkyoyuk ui kaehyog panghyangkwa kwaje [Reform directions and tasks for the 21st Korean education]. Seoul: Author.
Race, R. (2002). Teacher professionalism or deprofessionalisation? The consequences of school-based management on domestic and international context.British Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 459–463.
Roh, J-H. (2003). Chamhojongbu kyowonchongchaekui kwajewa panghyang [Tasks and directions for teacher policies in Chamhojongbu].Korean Educational Research Society, 31–53.
Sadovnik, A. R. (2002). Educational reform in the United States: 1980s and 1990s. In D. L. Levinson (Ed.),Education and sociology: An encyclopedia (pp. 221–233). New York: Routledge Falmer.
Samoff, J. (1993). The reconstruction of schooling in Africa.Comparative Education Review, 37(2), 186–222.
Sears, J. T., Marshall, J. D., & Otis-Wilborn, A. (1988).Teacher education policies and programs: Implementing reform proposals of the 1980’s. Paper presented for the Southeastern Educational Improvement Laboratory at the request of University of South Carolina Educational Policy Center.
Shanker, A. (1985). The making of a profession.American Educator.9 (3), 10–17,
Smyth, J., Dow, A., Hattam, R., Reid, A., & Shacklock, G. (2000).Teachers’ work in a globalizing economy. New York, NY: Falmer Press.
Song, K-Y. (2001,October).Chisigkibansahoeeso hankuk Kyowonŭi chonmunsong sinchang Pangan [Ways to enhance teacher professionalism in knowledge based society]. The 8th Korea and Japan Joint Seminar on Educational Administration. Seoul, Korea.
Special Committee for National Security Measure(SCNSM) (1983).Chilsamkong kyoyuk kaehyok [The July 30 educational reform]. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
Synott, J. (2001). Development, education and the teachers union movement in South Korea, 1989-1999.Australian Journal of Politics and History, 47, 130–148.
U. S. Department of Education(DOE). (1999).A talented, dedicated, and well-prepared teacher in every classroom: Information kit. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Vollmer, H., & Mills, D. (1966).Professionalization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Wilenski, H. (1964). The professionalizaton of everyone?American Sociological Review 52 (2), 137–58.
Yang, S-S. (2000). Improving Korean teachers’ professionalism: Issues of the recent personnel management reform.Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education and Development, 3(1), 99–116.
Yeom, M-H. (2005).Professionalization and the reform of teaching, teachers, and teacher education in the United States and the Republic of Korea: A critical discourse analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Yoo, H-J. (1983). Korean-American educational interchange.Korea Journal, 4–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yeom, M., Ginsburg, M. Professionalism and the reform of teachers and teacher education in the republic of korea & the United States of America. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 8, 298–310 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029264
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029264