Abstract
The paleobiology of the Cretaceous neoselachian shark,Squalicorax, has largely been based on isolated teeth. We examined partial and nearly complete skeletons of three species ofSqualicorax, S. falcatus (Aoassiz),S. kaupi (Agassiz), andS. pristodontus (Agassiz), that were collected from the U.S.A. These specimens suggest that the total body length (TL) ofS. falcatus typically measured 1.8–2.0 m, and probably did not exceed 3 m. Moderatesized individuals ofS. kaupi andS. pristodontus perhaps measured about 3 m TL. AlthoughS. pristodontus was the largest form among the three species examined, this taxon possessed a set of large jaws (with large but fewer teeth) relative to its body size compared toS. falcatus orS. kaupi. This suggests that tooth size is not an accurate indicator of the TL if one compares oneSqualicorax species to another. Neurocranial features suggest that the vision ofSqualicorax was not as acute as that of a contemporaneous macrophagous lamniform shark,Cretoxyrhina mantelli (Agassiz) , but olfaction ofSqualicorax may have been better thanC. mantelli. The morphology of placoid scales suggests thatSqualicorax was capable of fast swimming. New skeletal data support the view that the feeding dynamics ofSqualicorax was similar to the modern tiger shark (Galeocerdo Müller & Henle). The present data do not allow for exact ordinal placement, but, contrary to some previous interpretations,Squalicorax can be excluded from the Hexanchiformes and Orectolobiformes. The taxon should more appropriately be placed within the Lamniformes or Carcharhiniformes.
Kurzfassung
Bisher basierte die Kenntnis zur Paläobiologie des kretazischen NeoselachiersSqualicorax weitgehend auf isolierten Zähnen. Neue Untersuchungen an fast vollständigen sowie Teil-Skeletten von drei Arten der GattungSqualicorax (S.falcatus (Agassiz),S. kaupi (Agassiz) undS. pristodontus (Agassiz)) aus verschiedenen Gebieten der U.S.A. zeigen, dass die Gesamtkörperlänge vonS. falcatus im Durchschnitt 1,8–2,0 m betrug und wahrscheinlich 3 m nicht überschritt. Mittelgroße Individuen vonS. kaupi undS. pristodontus maßen vermutlich etwa 3 m Gesamtlänge.S. pristodontus war die größte der drei untersuchten Arten und besaß verglichen mitS. falcatus oderS. kaupi im Verhältnis zur Gesamtkörpergröße relativ große Kieferknochen mit großen Zähnen, jedoch in einer geringeren Anzahl. Es zeigt sich, dass im Vergleich der Arten untereinander die Zahngröße kein besonders gutes Indiz zur Rekonstruktion der Gesamtkörperlänge ist. Merkmale des Neurocraniums belegen, dass das Sehvermögen vonSqualicorax nicht so scharf war wie das des zeitgleich lebenden makrophagen lamniformen HaisCretoxyrhina mantelli (Agassiz), jedoch der Geruchssinn vonSqualicorax möglicherweise besser ausgebildet war als beiC. mantelli. Die Morphologie der Placoidschuppen deutet an, dassSqualicorax ein schneller Schwimmer war. Neue Daten zur Skelett-Morphologie bestätigen die Ansicht, dass das Fressverhalten vonSqualicorax dem des rezenten Tigerhais (Galeocerdo Muller & Henle) ähnelte. Die vorliegenden Daten geben keine genauen Hinweise zur systematischen Einordnung vonSqualicorax, allerdings kann eine Eingruppierung in die Hexanchiformes und Orectolobiformes, im Gegensatz zu früheren Ansichten, ausgeschlossen werden; eine Zuordnung zu den Lamniformes oder Carcharhiniformes kommt eher in Betracht.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Agassiz, L. 1843. Reserches sur les poissons fossils (5 volumes: 1833–1843). — 1420 p., Neuchatel (Imprimerie de Patitpierre).
Applegate, S.P. 1967. A survey of shark hard parts. — In:Gilbert, P.W.;Mathewson, R.F. &Rall, D.P., eds., Sharks, Skates, and Rays: 37–67. Baltimore (Johns Hopkins University Press).
Applegate, S.P. 1970. The vertebrate fauna of the Selma Formation of Alabama. Part 8: The fishes. — Fieldiana: Geology Memoirs3: 383–433.
Applegate, S.P. 1972. A revision of the higher taxa of orectolobids. — Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India14: 743–751.
Berg, L.S. 1958. System der Rezenten und fossilen Fischartigen und Fische. — 310 p., Berlin (Hochschulbücher für Biologie).
Bertin, L. &Arambourg, C. 1958. Systematique des Poissons. — In:Grasse, P., ed., Traité de Zoologie, 13, 3: 1967–1983, Paris (Libraries de l’Academie de Medecine).
Bilelo, M.A.M. 1969. The fossil shark GenusSqualicorax in north-central Texas. — Texas Journal of Science20: 339–348.
Blot, J. 1969. Holocephales et Elasmobranches. Systematique. — In:Piveteau, J., ed., Traité de Paléontologie, 4, 2: 702–776, Paris (Masson).
Burris, J.H. 2001. Reworked Cretaceous elasmobranch teeth and provenance of the Paleocene Hanna Formation (Hanna Basin, Wyoming). — Rocky Mountain Geology36: 37–48.
Cappetta, H. 1973. Selachians from the Carlile Shale (Turonian) of South Dakota. — Journal of Paleontology47: 504–514.
Cappetta, H. 1977. Observations sur quelques selaciens du Cretace superieur d’Angleterre avec la description d’un genre nouveau. — Geobios10: 479–485.
Cappetta, H. 1980. Les selaciens du Cretace superieur du Liban. 1. Requins. — Palaeontographica (A)168: 69–148.
Cappetta, H. 1987. Chondrichthyes 2: Mesozoic and Cenozoic Elasmobranchii. — In:Schultze, H.-P., ed., Handbook of Paleoichthyology, 3B: 1–193, Stuttgart (G. Fischer).
Cappetta, H. &Case, G.R. 1975. Selaciens nouveaux du Cretace du Texas. — Géobios8: 303–307.
Cappetta, H. &Case, G.R. 1999. Additions aux faunes de selaciens du Cretace du Texas (Albien superieur — Campanien). — Palaeo Ichthyologica9: 5–111.
Cappetta, H.;Duffin, C. &Zidek, J. 1993. Chondrichthyes. — In:Benton, M.J., ed., The Fossil Record, 2: 593–609, London (Chapman and Hall).
Carvalho, M.R. de 1996. Higher-level elasmobranch phylogeny, basal squaleans, and paraphyly. — In:Stiassny, M.L.J.;Parenti, L.R. &Johnson, G.D., eds., Interrelationships of Fishes: 35–62, San Diego (Academic Press).
Case, G.R. 1979. Cretaceous selachians from the Peedee Formation (Late Maestrichtian) of Duplin County, North Carolina. — Brimleyana2: 77–89.
Casier, E. 1947. Constitution et evolution de la racine dentaire des Euselachii, II. Etude comparative des types. — Bulletin du Musée Royal d’Histoire Naturelle de Belgique23: 1–32.
Cicimurri, D.J. 2001. Fossil selachians from the Belle Fourche Shale (Cretaceous, Cenomanian), Black Hills Region of South Dakota and Wyoming. — Mountain Geologist38: 181–192.
Cigala-Fulgosi, F. &Mori, D. 1979. Osservazioni tassonomiche sul genereGaleocerdo (Selachii, Carcharhinidae) con particolare riferimento aGaleocerdo cuvieri (Peron & Lesueur) nel Pliocene del Mediterranee. — Bollettino della Societa Paleontologica Italianal8: 117–132.
Compagno, L.J.V. 1973. Interrelationships of living elasmobranchs. — In:Greenwood, P.H.;Miles, R.S. &Patterson, C, eds., Interrelationships of Fishes: 15–61, London (Zoological Journal of Linnean Society of London53).
Compagno. L.J.V. 1977. Phyletic relationships of living sharks and rays. — American Zoologist17: 303–322.
Compagno, L.J.V. 1984. FAO species catalogue, 4. Sharks of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. — FAO Fisheries Synopsis 1254: 1–655.
Compagno, L.J.V. 1988. Sharks of the Order Carcharhiniformes. — 486 p., New Jersey (Princeton University Press).
Compagno, L.J.V. 1990. Relationships of the megamouth shark,Megachasma pelagios (Lamniformes: Megachasmidae), with comments on its feeding habits. — NOAA Technical Report NMFS90: 357–379.
Compagno, L.J.V. 1999a. Endoskeleton. — In:Hamlett, W.C., ed., Sharks, Skates, and Rays: The Biology of Elasmobranch Fishes: 69–92, Baltimore (Johns Hopkins University Press).
Compagno, L.J.V. 1999b. Checklist of living elasmobranchs. — In:Hamlett, W.C., ed., Sharks, Skates, and Rays: The Biology of Elasmobranch Fishes: 471–498, Baltimore (Johns Hopkins University Press).
Dingerkus, G. 1986. Interrelationships of orectolobiform sharks (Chondrichthyes: Selachii). — In:Uyeno, T.;Arai; R., Taniuchi, T. &Matsuura, K., eds., Indo-Pacific Fish Biology: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Indo-Pacific Fishes: 227–245, Tokyo (Ichthyological Society of Japan).
Dixon, F. 1850. The Geology and Fossils of the Tertiary and Cretaceous Formations of Sussex. — 408 p., London (Longman, Brown, Green, and Longman).
Druckenmiller, P.S.;Daun, A.J.;Skulan, J.L. &Pladziewicz, J.C. 1993. Stomach contents in the Upper Cretaceous sharkSqualicorax falcatus. — Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology13 (Supplement to Number 3): 33A-34A.
Fowler, H.W. 1911. A description of the fossil fish remains of the Cretaceous, Eocene and Miocene formations of New Jersey. — Bulletin of the Geological Survey of New Jersey4: 22–192.
Frazzetta, T.H. 1994. Feeding Mechanisms in sharks and other elasmobranchs. — Advances in Comparative and Environmental Physiology18: 31–57.
Frickhinger, K.A. 1995. Fossil Atlas, Fishes [translated byJefferies, R.P.S.]. — 1088 p., Blacksburg, Virginia (Tetra Press).
Glikman, L.S. 1958. [Rates of evolution in lamnoid sharks]. — Doklady Akademia Nauk SSSR123: 568–571 [in Russian].
Glikman, L.S. 1964. [Sharks of the Paleogene and Their Stratigraphie Significance]. — 229 p., Moscow-Leningrad (Nauka Press) [in Russian].
Glikman, L.S. 1967. Subclass Elasmobranchii (sharks). — In:Orlov, Y.A., ed., Fundamentals of Paleontology,11: 292–352, Jerusalem (Israel Program for Scientific Translations).
Glikman, L.S. 1980. [Evolution of Cretaceous and Cenozoic Lamnoid Sharks]. — 228 p., Moscow (Akademia Nauk USSR) [in Russian].
Glikman, L.S. &Shvazhaite, R.A. 1971. [Sharks of the family Anacoracidae from Cenomanian and Turonian of Lithuania, Pre-Volga’s Region and Middle Asia]. Paleontologiia i Stratigraphiia Pribatltiki Belorussii3: 185–192 [in Russian with English summary].
Gottfried, M.D.;Compagno, L.J.V. &Bowman, S.C. 1996. Size and skeletal anatomy of the giant “megatooth” sharkCarcharodon megalodon. — In:Klimley, A.p. &Alnley, D .G., eds., Great White Sharks: The Biology ofCarcharodon carcharias: 55–66, San Diego (Academic Press).
Gregory, W.K. 1951a. Evolution Emerging: A Survey of Changing Patterns from Primitive Life to Man. 1. — 736 p., New York (Mac-Millan Company).
Gregory, W.K. 1951b. Evolution Emerging: A Survey of Changing Patterns from Primitive Life to Man. 2. — 1013 p., New York (MacMillan Company).
Gunnerus, J.E. 1765. Brugden (Squalus maximus), Beskrevnen ved. — Kongelige norske Videnskabers selskab Skrifter Trondheim, Norway3: 33–49.
Hamm, S.A.;Shimada, K. &Everhart, M.J. 2003. Three uncommon lamniform sharks from the Smoky Hill Chalk (Upper Cretaceous) of western Kansas. — Abstract Kansas Academy of Science22: 30–31.
Herman, J. 1977 [1975]. Les selaciens des terrains neocretaces et paleocenes de Belgique et des contrees limitrophes. Elements d’une biostratigraphique intercontinentale. — Memoires pour servir a l’explication des Cartes Geologiques et Minieres de la Belgique15: 1–401 (Service Geologique de Belgique),
Janvier, P. &Welcomme, J.-L. 1969. Affinites et Paleobiologie de l’especeCarcharodon megalodon Ag. Squale geant des Faluns de la Touraine et de l’Anjou. — Revue de la Féderation Française des Sociétés de Sciences Naturelles (3)8 (34): 1–6.
Garrick, D.S. 1898. Description of a species of fish (Mitsukurirm owstonï) from Japan, the type of a distinct family of lamnoid sharks. — Proceedings of the California Academy of Science (Zoology) (3)1 (6): 199–202.
Kriwet, J. &Oppermann, K. 1997. First articulated shark remains (Neoselachii, Lamniformes, Anacoracidae) from the Late Cretaceous of Spain. — Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology17 (Supplement to Number 3): 58A.
Lauginiger, E.M. 1986. An Upper Cretaceous vertebrate assemblage from Big Brook, New Jersey. — Mosasaur3: 53–61.
Lauginiger, E.M. 1988. Cretaceous Fossils from the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal: A Guide for Students and Collectors. — Delaware Geological Survey, Special Publication18: 1–56.
Leriche, M. 1902. Revision de la faune ichthyologique des terrains cretaces du Nord de la France. — Annales de la Société Géologique du Nord31: 87–154.
Leriche, M. 1906. Contribution a l’etude des poissons fossiles du nord de la France et des regions voisines. — Memoires de la Société Géologique du Nord5: 1–430.
Leriche, M. 1929. Les poissons du Cretace marin de la Belgique et du Limbourg hollandais. — Bulletin de la Société Belge de Géologie, de Paléontologie et d’Hydrologie37: 199–299.
Maisey, J.G. 1983. Cranial anatomy ofHybodus basanus Egerton from the Lower Cretaceous of England. — American Museum Novitates2758: 1–64.
Maisey, J.G. 1984. Higher elasmobranch phylogeny and biostratigraphy. — Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society82: 33–54.
Martin, J.E.;Schumacher, B.A.;Parris, D.C. &Grandstaff, B.S. 1998. Fossil vertebrates of the Niobrara Formation in South Dakota. — Dakoterra5: 39–54.
Meyer, R.L. 1974. Late Cretaceous elasmobranchs from the Mississippi and East Texas embayments of the Gulf Coastal Plain. — 419 p., Dallas, Texas (Southern Methodist University, Ph.D. dissertation).
Moss, S.A. 1972. The feeding mechanism of sharks of the family Carcharhinidae. — Journal of Zoology167: 423–436.
Moss, S.A. 1977. Feeding mechanisms in sharks. — American Zoologist17: 355–364.
Motta, P.J. &Wilga, C.A.D. 1995. Anatomy of the feeding apparatus of the lemon shark,Negaprion brevirostris. — Journal of Morphology226: 309–329.
Motta, P.J. &Wilga, C.D. 2001. Advances in the study of feeding behaviors, mechanisms, and mechanics of sharks. — Environmental Biology of Fishes60: 131–156.
Muller, J. &Henle, F.G.J. 1837. Ueber die Gattungen der Plagiostomen. — Archiv für Naturgeschichte3: 394–401.
Noubhani, A. &Cappetta, H. 1997. Les Orectolobiformes, Carcharhiniformes et Myliobatiformes (Elasmobranchii, Neoselachii) des Bassins à phosphate du Maroc (Maastrichtien-Lutétien basal). — Paleo Ichthyologica8: 1–327.
Priem, F. 1897. Sur des dents d’Elasmobranches de divers gisements senoniens (Villedieu, Moudon, Folxles-Caves). — Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France3: 40–56.
Randall, J.E. 1992. Review of the biology of the tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier). — Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research43: 21–31.
Raschi, W. &Elsom, J. 1986. Comments on the structure and development of the drag-reduction-type placoid scale. — In:Uyeno, T.;Arai, R.;Taniuchi, T. &Matsuura, K., eds., Indo-Pacific Fish Biology: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Indo-Pacific Fishes: 408–424, Tokyo (Ichthyological Society of Japan).
Raschi, W. &Tabit, C. 1992. Functional aspects of placoid scales: a review and update. — Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research43: 123–147.
Reif, W.E. &Dinkelacker, A. 1982. Hydrodynamics of the squamation in fast swimming sharks. — Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen164: 184–187.
Rothschild, B.M. &Martin, L.D. 1993. Paleopathology: Disease in the Fossil Record. — 400 p., Boca Raton, Florida (CRC Press).
Rozefelds, A.C. 1993. Lower Cretaceous Anacoracidae? (Lamniformes: Neoselachii); vertebrae and associated dermal scales from Australia. — Alcheringa ##: 199–210.
Schwimmer, D.R. 1997. Late Cretaceous dinosaurs in Eastern USA: a taphonomic and biogeographic model of occurrences. — Dinofest International Proceedings 203–211.
Schwimmer, D.R.;Stewart, J.D. &Williams, G.D. 1997. Scavenging by sharks of the genusSqualicorax in the Late Cretaceous of North America. — Palaios12: 71–83.
Shimada, K. 1994. Jaws of the Late Cretaceous shark,Squalicorax kaupi, from western Kansas. — Journal of Morphology220: 393.
Shimada, K. 1997a. Paleoecological relationships of the Late Cretaceous lamniform shark,Cretoxyrhina mantelli (Agassiz). — Journal of Paleontology71: 926–933.
Shimada, K. 1997b. Skeletal anatomy of the Late Cretaceous lamniform shark,Cretoxyrhina mantelli, from the Niobrara Chalk in Kansas. — Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology17: 642–652.
Shimada, K. 2002. Dental homologies in lamniform sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii). — Journal of Morphology251: 38–72.
Shimada, K. &Hooks, G.E., III. 2004. Shark-bitten protostegid turtles from the Upper Cretaceous Mooreville Formation of Alabama. — Journal of Paleontology78: 205–210.
Shirai, S. 1992. Squalean phylogeny: A new framework of “squaloid” sharks and related taxa. — 151 p. (plus 58 plates), Sapporo (Hokkaido University Press).
Shirai, S. 1996. Phylogenetic interrelationships of neoselachians (Chondrichthyes: Euselachii). — InStiassny, M.L.J.;Parenti, L.R. &Johnson, G.D., eds., Interrelationships of Fishes: 9–34, San Diego (Academic Press).
Shourd, M.L. &Winter, H.F. 1980. Paleocene megafossils from southeastern Missouri. — Journal of Paleontology54: 832–839.
Siverson, M. 1992. Biology, dental morphology and taxonomy of lamniform sharks from the Campanian of the Kristianstad Basin, Sweden. — Palaeontology35: 519–554.
Siverson, M. 1996. Lamniform sharks of the mid Cretaceous Alinga Formation and Beedagong Claystone, western Australia. — Palaeontology39: 813–849.
Springer, S. 1961. Dynamics of the feeding mechanism of large galeoid sharks. — American Zoologist1: 183–185.
Springer, V.G. &Garrick, J.A.F. 1964. A survey of vertebral numbers in sharks. — United States National Museum Proceedings116: 73–96.
Stewart, J.D. 1978. Enterospirae (fossil intestines) from the Upper Cretaceous Niobrara Formation of western Kansas. — University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions89: 9–16.
Stewart, J.D. 1993. The case of the sword-swallowing shark. — Terra31: 42–43.
Strömer, E. 1927. Ergebnisse der Forschungsreisen Prof. E. Strömers in den Wüsten Ägypten. 2. Wirbeltier-Reste der Baharije-Stufe (Unterstes Cenoman). 9. Die Plagiostomen mit einem Anhang über Käno- und mesozoische Rückenflossenstacheln von Elasmobranchiern. — Abhandlungen der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Abteilung (N.F.)31 (5): 1–64.
Taylor, L.R.;Compagno, L.J.V. &Struhsaker, P.J. 1983. Megamouth — a new species, genus, and family of lamnoid shark (Megachasma pelagios. Family Megachasmidae) from the Hawaiian Islands. — Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences43: 87–110.
Thies, D. &Reif, W.-E. 1985. Phylogeny and evolutionary ecology of Mesozoic Neoselachii. — Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen169: 333–361.
Thomson. K.S. &Simanek, D.E. 1977. Body form and locomotion in sharks. — American Zoologist17: 343–354.
Walker, C. &Ward, D. 1992. Fossils. — 320 p., New York (Dorling Kindersley Publishing Book).
Welton, B.J. &Farish, R.F. 1993. The Collector’s Guide to Fossil Sharks and Rays from the Cretaceous of Texas. — 204 p., Lewisvile, Texas (Before Time).
Wiley. E.O. &Stewart, J.D. 1977. A gar (Lepisosteus sp.) from the marine Cretaceous Niobrara Formation of western Kansas. — Copeia1977: 761–762.
White, E.G. 1936. A classification and phylogeny of the elasmobranch fishes. — American Museum Novitates837: 1–16.
White, E.G. 1937. Interrelationships of the elasmobranchs with a key to the order Galea. — Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History74: 25–118.
Whitley, G.P. 1939. Taxonomic notes on sharks and rays. — Australian Journal of Zoology9 (3): 227–262.
Wllga, C.D.;Hueter, R.E.;Wainwright, P.C. &Motta, P.J. 2001. Evolution of upper jaw protrusion mechanisms in elasmobranchs. — American Zoologist41: 1248–1257.
Williamson, T.E.;Kirkland, J.I. &Lucas, S.G. 1993. Selachians from the Greenhorn cyclothem (“Middle” Cretaceous: Cenomanian — Turanian), Black Mesa, Arizona, and the paleogeographic distribution of Late Cretaceous selachians. — Journal of Paleontology67: 447–474.
Williamson, T.E.:Lucas, S.G. &Pence, R. 1989. Selachians from the Hosta Tongue of the Point Lookout Sandstone (Upper Cretaceous, Santonian), Central New Mexico. — New Mexico Geological Society, Guidebook40: 239–245.
Wllliston, S.W. 1900. Cretaceous fishes: selachians and pycnodonts. — University of Kansas Geological Survey4: 237–256.
Wolberg, D.L. 1985a. Selachians from the Late Cretaceous (Turanian) Atarque Sandstone Member, Tres Hermanos Formation, Sevilleta Grant, Socorro County, New Mexico. — New Mexico Geology7: 1–7.
Wolberg, D.L. 1985b. Selachians from the Atarque Sandstone Member of the Très Hermanos Formation (Upper Cretaceous: Turanian), Sevilleta Grant near La Joya, Socorro County, New Mexico. — New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Circular195: 7–19.
Woodward, A.S. 1889. Catalogue of the fossil fishes in the British Museum (Natural History), London. — 474 p., London (British Museum).
Woodward, A.S. 1909–1912. The Fossils of the English Chalk. — 264 p., London (Paleontological Society of London).
Wu, E.H. 1994. Kinematic analysis of jaw protrusion in orectolobiform sharks: a new mechanism for jaw protrusion in elasmobranchs. — Journal of Morphology222: 175–190.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shimada, K., Cicimurri, D.J. Skeletal anatomy of the Late Cretaceous shark,Squalicorax (Neoselachii: Anacoracidae). Paläontol. Z. 79, 241–261 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990187
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990187