Abstract
Since the restriction imposed by European Union regulations on the use of TBT-based antifouling paints on boats below 25 m in length, new terms have been introduced in the ‘small boat’ market. Replacement products are generally based on copper metal oxides and organic biocides. Several studies have demonstrated the presence of these biocides in European ports and marinas of Spain, France, Germany and the United Kingdom. An extended survey of the antifouling biocides chlorothalonil, dichlofluanid, irgarol 1051 and sea-nine 211 was carried out in Greek ports and marinas of high boating activities from October 1999 to September 2000. The sampling sites were: Piraeus, Elefsina, Thessaloniki, Patras, Chalkida, Igoumenitsa, and Preveza (Aktio). The extraction of these compounds from the seawater samples was performed off-line with C18 solid phase extraction (SPE) disks while the determination was carried out with gas chromatography coupled to electron capture (ECD), thermionic (FTD) and mass spectroscopy (MS) detectors. The concentration levels of biocides were higher during the period from April to October. This seasonal impact depends on the application time of antifouling paints and mimic trends in the seasonal distribution of biocides in other European sites.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Biselli S, Bester K, Huhnerfuss H, Fent K (2000): Concentrations of the Antifouling Compound Irgarol 1051 and of Organotins in Water and Sediments of German North and Baltic Sea Marinas. Mar Pollut Bull 40: 233–243
Boxall ABA, Comber SD, Conrad AU, Howcroft J, Zaman N (2000): Inputs, monitoring and fate modelling of antifouling biocides in UK Estuaries. Mar Pollut Bull 40: 898–905
Caux PY, Kent RA, Fan GT, Stephenson GL (1996): Environmental fate and effects of chlorothalonil: A Canadian perspective. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 26: 45–93
Champ MA (2000): A review of organotin regulatory strategies, pending actions, related costs and benefits. Sci Total Environ 258:21–71
Ferrer I, Barcelo D (1999): Simultaneous determination of antifouling herbicides in marina water samples by on-line solid-phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy. J Chromatogr A 854: 197–206
Ferrer I, Ballesteros B, Marco MP, Barcelo D (1997): Pilot survey for the determination of the antifouling agent irgarol 1051 in enclosed seawater samples by a direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and solid-phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography-diode array detection. Environ Sci Technol 31: 3530–3535
Gough MA, Fothergill J, Hendrie JD (1994): A survey of Southern England Coastal Waters for the s-Triazine Antifouling Compound irgarol 1051. Mar Pollut Bull 28: 613–620
Jacombson AH, Willingham GL (2000): Sea-nine antifoulant: an environmentally acceptable alternative to organotin antifoulants. Sci Total Environ 258: 103–110
Martinez K, Ferrer I, Barcelo D (2000): Part-per-trillion level determination of antifouling pesticides and their byproducts in seawater samples by off-line solid-phase extraction followed by high-performance liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 879: 27–37
Okamura H, Aoyama I, Liu D, Maguire RJ, Pacepavicius GJ, Lau YL (2000): Fate and ecotoxicity of the new antifouling compound irgarol 1051 in the aquatic environment. Water Res 34: 3523–3530
Ranke J, Jastorff B (2000): Multidimensional risk analysis of antifouling biocides. Environ Sci Pollut Res 7: 105–114
Readman JW, Kwong LLW, Grondin D, Bartocci J, Villeneuve JP, Mee LD (1993): Coastal water contamination from a triazine herbicide used in antifouling paints. Environ Sci Technol 27: 1940–1942
Sargent CJ, Bowman JC, Zhou JL (2000): Levels of antifoulant irgarol 1051 in the Conway Marina, North Wales. Chemosphere 41: 1755–1760
Scarlett A, Donkin ME, Fileman TW, Donkin P (1997): Occurrence of the marine antifouling agent irgarol 1051 within the Plymouth Sound locality: Implications for the Green Macroalga Enteromorpha intestinalis. Mar Pollut Bull 34: 645–651
Thomas KV, Fileman TW, Readman JW, Waldock MJ (2001): Antifouling paint booster biocides in the UK coastal environment and potential risks of biological effects. Mar Pollut Bull 42: 677–688
Thomas KV, Blake SJ, Waldock MJ (2000): Antifouling paint booster biocide contamination in UK Marine sediments. Mar Pollut Bull 40: 739–745
Tolosa I, Readman JW, Blaevoet A, Ghilini S, Bartocci J, Horvat M (1996): Contamination of Mediterranean (Cote d’Azur) coastal waters by organotins and irgarol 1051 used in antifouling paints. Mar Pollut Bull 32: 335–341
Toth S, Becker-van Slooten K, Spack L, Alencastro LF, Tarradellas J (1996): Irgarol 1051, an Antifouling Compound in Freshwater, Sediment and Biota of Lake Geneva. Environ Contam Toxicol 57: 426–433
Voulvounis N, Scrimshaw MD, Lester JN (1999): Analytical methods for the determination of 9 antifouling paint booster biocides in estuarine water samples. Chemosphere 38: 3503–3516
Voulvounis N, Scrimshaw MD, Lester JN (2000): Occurrence of four biocides utilized in antifouling paints, as alternatives to organotin compounds, in waters and sediments of a commercial estuary in the UK. Mar Pollut Bull 40: 938–946
Voulvounis N, Scrimshaw MD, Lester JN (2002): Partitioning of selected antifouling biocides in the aquatic environment. Mar Environ Res 53: 1–16
Zhou JL, Fileman TW, Evans S, Donkin P, Mantoura RFC, Rowland SJ (1996): Seasonal distribution of dissolved pesticides and polynuclear aromatic-hydrocarbons in the Humber estuary and Humber coastal zone. Mar Pollut Bull 32: 599–608
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sakkas, V.A., Konstantinou, I.K., Lambropoulou, D.A. et al. Survey for the occurrence of antifouling paint booster biocides in the aquatic environment of Greece. Environ Sci & Pollut Res 9, 327–332 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987576
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987576