Abstract
The relationship of photosynthesis and dark respiration to reduced potato growth at temperatures above 20°C was determined. Ten potato clones were propagated in vitro from sterile plandets and grown in a growth chamber at 20/15°C and 30/25°C (day/night) with an 18 hr. daylength. Plants were harvested 26 to 30 days after transplanting. Daylength was decreased to 12 hrs. to induce tuberization and plants were harvested at 45-51 and 75-79 days after transplanting. At each harvest one plant from each cultivar was chosen from each of five blocks and selected growth (tuber number and dry weight of leaves, stems, roots and stolons, and tubers) and physiological variates [leaf area, net photosynthesis, maintenance dark respiration, and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters 0 (Initial), P (Peak), T (Terminal), P-O (Variable fluorescence) and P-T (Fluorescence quenching)] were measured. The high temperature decreased root and stolon, tuber and total dry weight and increased stem dry weight. Amongst physiological variates, the higher temperature decreased leaf area, net photosynthesis and maintenance dark respiration. The chlorophyll fluorescence parameter 0 significantly increased, which also increased the P and T parameters. Variable fluorescence (P-O) and fluorescence quenching (PT) were not significantly affected by the growth temperature. The analyses of covariance, in which physiological variates were used as covariates to remove significant differences in growth variates, indicated that the most effective covariate was the T chlorophyll fluorescence parameter. The least effective covariates were leaf dark respiration and the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters P-O and P-T. The changes in 0 fluorescence suggest that reduced photosynthetic efficiency, particularly in Photosystem II, plays a major role in reduced potato production at high temperatures.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Literature Cited
Ben Khedher, M. and E.E. Ewing. 1985. Growth analyses of eleven potato cultivars grown in the greenhouse under long photoperiods with and without heat stress. Am Potato J 62:537–54.
Borah, M.N. and F.L. Milthorpe. 1962. Growth of the potato as influenced by temperature. Indian J Plant Physiol 5:53–72.
Burton, W.G. 1972. III.3. The response of the potato plant and tuber to temperature, pp. 217–233.In: A.R. Rees, K.E. Cockshull, D.W. Hand and R.G. Hurd (Eds.). Crop Processes in Controlled Environments. Academic Press, London.
Bushnell, J. 1925. The relation of temperature to growth and respiration in die potato plant. Minnesota Agr Expt Sta Bull 34.
Day, D.A., O.C. De Vos, D. Wilson and H. Lambers. 1985. Regulation of respiration in the leaves and roots of twoLolium perenne populations with contrasting mature leaf respiration rates and crop yields. Plant Physiol 78:678–83.
Deng, R. 1988. Partitioning of 14C-sucrose and dry matter in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) under high temperature as affected by cultivar and paclobutrazol. M.Sc. Thesis, Dalhousie Univ. 158 pp.
Ewing, E.E. 1981. Heat stress and the tuberization stimulus. Am Potato J 58:31–49.
Genstat Committee. 1987. Genstat 5 Reference Manual. Oxford University Press.
Hetherington, S.E., R.M. Smillie, P. Malagamba and Z. Huaman. 1983. Heat tolerance and cold tolerance of cultivated potatoes measured by the chlorophyll fluorescence method. Planta 159:119–24.
Hoagland, D.R. and D.I. Arnon. 1939. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif Agr Expt Sta Circ 347. 39 pp.
Irving, D.E. and J.H. Silsbury. 1987. A comparison of the rate of maintenance respiration in some crop legumes and tobacco determined by three methods. Ann Bot 59:257–64.
Krause, G.H. and E. Weis. 1984. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool in plant physiology. II. Interpretation of fluorescence signals. Photosyn Res 5:139–57.
Marinus, J. and K.B.A. Bodlaender. 1975. Response of some potato varieties to temperature. Potato Res 18:189–204.
McCree, K.J. and J.H. Silsbury. 1978. Growth and maintenance requirements of subterranean clover. Crop Sci 18:13–18.
Mendoza, H.A. and R.N. Estrada. 1979. Breeding potatoes for tolerance to stress: Heat and frost.In: Mussell, H. and R.C. Staples (Eds.). Stress physiology in crop plants. John Wiley and Sons. pp. 227–62.
Schreiber, U. 1983. Chorophyll fluorescence yield as a tool in plant physiology I. The measuring system. Photosyn Res 4:361–373.
Schreiber, U. and J.A. Berry. 1977. Heat-induced changes of chlorophyll fluorescence in intact leaves correlated with damage of the photosynthetic apparatus. Planta 136:233–38.
Sharpe, P.J.H. 1983. Responses of photosynthesis and dark respiration to temperature. Ann Bot 52:325–43.
Sipos, J. and R.K. Prange. 1986. Response of ten potato cultivars to temperature as measured by chlorophyll fluorescencein vivo. Am Potato J 63:683–94.
Smillie, R.M. and G.C. Gibbons. 1981. Heat tolerance and heat hardening in crop plants measured by chlorophyll fluorescence. Carlsberg Res Comm 46:395–403.
Snedecor, G.W. and W.G. Cochran. 1980. Statistical Methods, 7th ed. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
Wilson, D. 1975. Variation in leaf respiration in relation to growth and photosynthesis ofLolium. Ann App Biol 80:323–38.
Winkler, E. 1961. Assimilationsvermogen, Atmung und Ertrage der Kartoffelsorten Oberarnbacher Fruhe, Planet, Lori, und Agnes im Tal (610 m) und an der Wald- grenze bei Innsbruck und Vent (1880 m bzw. 2014 m) Flora Jena 151:621–62.
Winkler, E. 1971. Kartoffelbau in Tirol II. Photosynthesevermogen und Respiration von verschiedenen Kartoffelsorten. Potato Res 14:1–18.
Wivutvongvana, M. 1979. Physiological response of heat tolerant and heat sensitive potatoes (Solarium species). Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell Univ. 121 p.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Contribution No. 2043, Kentville Research Station.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prange, R.K., McRae, K.B., Midmore, D.J. et al. Reduction in potato growth at high temperature: role of photosynthesis and dark respiration. American Potato Journal 67, 357–369 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987277
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987277